My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-244 <br />Additionally, the following government agencies were contacted between 2011 and 2013 regarding <br />cultural resource information that had not yet been submitted to the DAHP: <br />• U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) <br />• Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) <br />• U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) <br />• Joint Base Lewis-McChord Yakima Training Center (JBLM YTC) <br />• Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) <br />• Grant County Public Utility District (PUD) <br />• Washington Department of Natural Resources <br />Other data sources were examined to determine whether certain classes of specially designated cultural <br />resources existed within or near the Project study area. These included: <br />• National Historic Landmarks. National Historic Landmarks (NHLs) are nationally significant <br />historic places designated by the Secretary of the Interior because they possess exceptional <br />value or quality in illustrating or interpreting the heritage of the United States. The nearest <br />NHL to the Project study area is the B Reactor at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site <br />near Richland in Benton County. <br />• National Register of Historic Places. The National Register is the National Park Service’s <br />official list of the nation’s historic places worthy of preservation. The National Register is <br />part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, <br />evaluate, and protect America’s historic and archeological resources. <br />• Washington Heritage Register. The Washington Heritage Register is an official listing of <br />historically significant sites and properties found throughout the state. The list is maintained <br />by the DAHP. <br />The Yakama Nation Cultural Resources Program (YNCRP) conducted cultural resource surveys on <br />federal land along some route segments. Updated survey results for Route Segments 1b, 3a, and 3c along <br />Alternative D and Route Segments NNR-3, NNR-4, NNR-6, NNR-7, and NNR-8 along the NNR <br />Alternative (Camuso and Lally 2014, Camuso and Lally 2015) have been incorporated into Section 3.11 <br />where appropriate. <br />The Cultural Resources Program of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (under <br />contract with Pacific Power) collected oral histories and conducted a TCP study for the Project study area <br />(Lally and Camuso 2011, Lally and Camuso 2013) and conducted a second study for the NNR Alternative <br />and portions of Alternative D (Camuso and Lally 2014). Also, because the NNR Alternative lies within <br />the traditional territory of the Moses Columbia Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation <br />History and Archaeology Program (under contract with Pacific Power) conducted further TCP studies in <br />the area and prepared a report (Oosahwee-Voss 2014). <br />Locations of all recorded prehistoric and historic resources, including isolated finds, and of previously <br />conducted cultural resource investigations within one mile of one or more of the Action Alternative route <br />segment centerlines were entered into a geographic information system database. Over 2,750 cultural <br />resources have been recorded within one mile of the centerline of each Action Alternative including the <br />NNR Alternative (Camuso and Lally 2014). Only 190 of these are located within 250 feet of the <br />centerlines. It is acknowledged that: <br />• Cultural resource site boundaries are sometimes not well defined; and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.