My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-237 <br />3.10 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE <br />As was done in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Supplemental Draft <br />Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS), this section describes the existing conditions (affected <br />environment) and considers issues related to environmental justice (EJ) along all Action Alternatives <br />presented in the DEIS and SDEIS, including those raised during scoping. This Final Environmental <br />Impact Statement (FEIS) section consolidates and builds on the information presented in the January <br />2013 DEIS as well as the January 2015 SDEIS and includes references to those documents throughout the <br />text where appropriate. This FEIS identifies the New Northern Route (NNR) Alternative – Overhead <br />Design Option as the Environmentally Preferred Alternative and has selected the NNR Alternative – <br />Overhead Design Option as the Agency Preferred Alternative. <br />3.10.1 Regulatory Framework <br />Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and <br />Low-income Populations (Federal Register 1994) was enacted to reinforce Title VI of the Civil Rights <br />Act of 1964. In the Civil Rights Act, it is stated that “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds <br />of race, color, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be <br />subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance” (United <br />States Code [U.S.C.] §1964). Executive Order 12898 states, “Each Federal agency shall make achieving <br />environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately <br />high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on <br />minority populations and low-income populations” (Federal Register 1994). Additional guidance from the <br />President’s Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) clarified that EJ concerns could arise from effects <br />on the natural and physical environment that produce human health or ecological outcomes or from <br />adverse social or economic changes. <br />The Executive Order requires that impacts on minority or low-income populations be analyzed for the <br />geographical area in which the Project would be located to determine if there would be a <br />disproportionately high and adverse impact on minority and/or low-income populations. If the <br />demographic analysis reveals that disproportionately high and adverse impacts would occur, mitigation <br />then needs to be proposed to address the effects. Standard approved methods for evaluation of EJ impacts <br />are included within the CEQ document, “Environmental Justice Guidance under the National <br />Environmental Policy Act” (NEPA; CEQ 1997). These methods were used for the evaluation of the <br />proposed Project that is described in this section. <br />The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) defines “environmental justice” as the fair <br />treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income <br />with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, <br />and policies. Fair treatment means that no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of <br />environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences <br />of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies. Meaningful <br />involvement means that: 1) potentially affected community members have an appropriate opportunity to <br />participate in decisions about a proposed activity that will affect their environment and/or health; 2) the <br />public’s contribution can influence the regulatory agency’s decision; 3) the concerns of all participants <br />involved will be considered in the decision-making process; and 4) the decision-makers seek out and <br />facilitate the involvement of those potentially affected. An action may involve an EJ concern if it could: <br />• Create new disproportionate impacts on minority, low-income, or indigenous populations.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.