My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-137 <br />upland areas (shorelands) within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of those waters; associated <br />wetlands and river deltas; and floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward 200 feet from such <br />floodways. Water bodies in Kittitas County that correspond to the Project study area that are considered <br />shorelines of statewide importance and regulated under the Kittitas County SMP include the Columbia <br />River (Route Segment 3b below the Wanapum Dam) and Route Segment NNR-8 below the Wanapum <br />Dam (Wanapum Dam Reservoir). All proposed uses and development occurring within shoreline <br />jurisdiction must conform to the intent and requirements of RCW Chapter 90.58, the Special Management <br />Area, and the Kittitas County SMP whether or not a permit or other form of authorization is required. No <br />substantial development shall be undertaken on shorelines of the state without first obtaining a permit. If <br />any of the support structures will be located within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of the <br />Columbia River or Wanapum Dam Reservoir or if there will be any ground disturbing activities within <br />this same area, the appropriate permit (substantial development, variance, or conditional use) will be <br />acquired through Kittitas County. <br />Grant County <br />The fourth largest county in the state, Grant County is approximately 2,675 square miles in area and is <br />bordered on the west by Douglas and Kittitas counties, on the south by Yakima and Benton counties, on <br />the north by Okanogan County, and on the east by Adams County. The Columbia River flows in a deep <br />valley along the west and southwestern boundary of the county. The City of Ephrata located outside of the <br />Project study area in the central part of the county is the County Seat. A portion of the proposed Project is <br />located south and east of the Wanapum Dam in Grant County. <br />The Grant County Comprehensive Plan (2006, amended 2010) documents the following goals and <br />policies related to utilities and in particular, transmission lines: <br />Goal U-1: Necessary energy and communication facilities and services should be available to <br />support current and future development. <br />• Policy U-1.3: The County should encourage the location of necessary utility facilities <br />within existing and planned transportation and utility corridors. <br />• Policy U-1.4: The County’s land use planning should be coordinated with the planning <br />activities of electrical, telephone and cable providers to ensure that providers of public <br />services and private utilities use the land use element of this plan when planning for <br />future facilities. <br />Goal U-2: Negative impacts associated with the siting, development, and operation of utility <br />services and facilities on adjacent properties, significant cultural resources, and the natural <br />environment should be minimized. <br />• Policy U-2.5: Where possible, the joint use of transportation ROWs and utility corridors <br />should be encouraged, provided that such joint use is consistent with limitations as may <br />be prescribed by applicable law and prudent utility practice. <br />Goal U-5: Site utility facilities in conformance with the Land Use Element. <br />• Policy U-5.1: Utility providers should avoid placement of facilities in areas designated as <br />environmentally sensitive or critical areas unless no feasible alternative exists and only <br />after a site assessment and mitigation plan has been approved under the provisions of <br />Grant County’s Resource Lands and Critical Areas Ordinance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.