Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 3 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Affected Environment <br /> PAGE 3-111 <br />3.4 LAND JURISDICTION AND LAND USE <br />As was done in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Supplemental Draft <br />Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS), this section describes the existing conditions (affected <br />environment) and considers issues related to land jurisdiction and land use along all Action Alternatives <br />presented in the DEIS and SDEIS, including those raised during scoping. This Final Environmental <br />Impact Statement (FEIS) section consolidates and builds on the information presented in the January <br />2013 DEIS as well as the January 2015 SDEIS and includes references to those documents throughout the <br />text where appropriate. This FEIS identifies the New Northern Route (NNR) Alternative – Overhead <br />Design Option as the Environmentally Preferred Alternative and U.S. Bureau of Land Management <br />(BLM) has selected the NNR Alternative – Overhead Design Option as the Agency Preferred Alternative. <br />This section characterizes the uses and jurisdiction of land in the Project study area in south-central <br />Washington. The purpose of the land use analysis is to inventory land uses and to assess the potential land <br />use impacts of each of the Action Alternative route segments. Data was compiled for land uses and <br />jurisdiction within a two-mile wide study corridor (Project study area), one mile on either side of the <br />assumed centerline of each Action Alternative route segment. The Project study area includes the <br />northwest part of Yakima County west of and adjacent to the Joint Base Lewis-McChord Yakima <br />Training Center (JBLM YTC), the northwestern corner of Benton County, the southwest corner of Grant <br />County, and the southeast corner of Kittitas County. Appendix A - Jurisdiction, Recreation, and Special <br />Management Areas Map of this FEIS shows land jurisdiction in the Project study area. Appendix A - <br />Land Use Map shows existing land use. <br />3.4.1 Data Sources <br />Land use data were collected for the Project study area. Information for the inventory was obtained from <br />various federal, state, and local agencies, including the following: <br />• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Priority List (NPL) website database <br />• U.S. Department of the Army (Army) – FEIS for the Fort Lewis Army Growth and Force <br />Structure Realignment (July 2010) <br />• BLM – Spokane Resource Management Plan (RMP) – Rangeland Program Summary Record of <br />Decision (ROD) (1987) <br />• BLM – Proposed Spokane RMP Amendment Final ROD (1992) <br />• BLM – ROD for the Spokane RMP Amendment (1992) <br />• BLM – Analysis of the Management Situation for the Eastern Washington and San Juan RMP <br />(BLM 2011) <br />• Washington State Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Land Use Database <br />• Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Map of State Trust Lands and Other <br />Major Public and Tribal Lands in Washington State (2010) <br />• Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE) Toxic Cleanup program website database <br />• Benton County Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2006, amended 009) <br />• Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan (2013) <br />• Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Plan (2014) <br />• Grant County Comprehensive Plan (2006, amended 2010) <br />• Grant County Public Utility District (PUD) No. 2 Priest Rapids/Wanapum Land Use Plan (1992) <br />• Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project Recreation Management Plan Amendment (Grant County <br />PUD 2010b) <br />• Grant County Shoreline Master Program (2015) <br />• Yakima County “Plan 2015” Comprehensive Plan (2007)