My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Executive Summary <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS October 2016 <br /> PAGE ES-viii <br />Subroute has the lowest number of miles of no identifiable impacts (30.0 miles), Alternative H has the <br />highest number of miles of no identifiable impacts (54.1 miles), NNR Alternative – Overhead and <br />Underground Options have the lowest number of miles with low impacts (8.2), and Alternatives E and G <br />have the highest number of miles of low impacts (13.2 miles). No moderate or high impacts to water <br />resources are anticipated for any of the Action Alternatives. <br />Geology and Soils <br />No long-term disturbance to geologic and soil resources would occur with the construction of any of the <br />Action Alternatives. Overall impact levels are similar for all of the Action Alternatives with overhead <br />construction, with the majority of the impacts categorized as moderate to low. However, the NNR <br />Alternative – Underground Design Option would create more moderate impacts as compared to other <br />NNR Alternative options (including the Agency Preferred Alternative) due to the displacement of greater <br />volumes of soil as a result of excavated areas. Alternative F would have the highest amount of moderate <br />impacts (19.6 miles) and Alternative B would have the highest amount of impacts characterized as high <br />(7.9 miles). While geotechnical investigations are included in the RDFs, a more comprehensive <br />geotechnical investigation would be required along the entire NNR Alternative – Underground Design <br />Option as compared to the Action Alternatives with an overhead construction design. <br />Geology and soil impacts resulting from open cut trenching are expected to be greater than those that <br />would occur from an overhead design option as the area that would be disturbed is larger. It is estimated <br />that approximately 215,000 cubic yards of soil and bedrock would need to be excavated for the NNR <br />Alternative – Underground Design Option. This is approximately equal to 13,400 standard, double-axle <br />dump truck loads (assuming 16 cubic yards per load). In addition to the impact caused by trenching, <br />excavated soil and bedrock must be stockpiled and/or transported during construction. <br />The risk of electric transmission service disruption as a result of seismic activity or landslides would be <br />substantially greater with the NNR Alternative – Underground Design Option than any of the other <br />Action Alternatives due to the inability to span discovered geologic faults.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.