Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 2 230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Proposed Action and Alternatives PAGE 2-59 PHS-7: Pacific Power will limit construction activities to daytime hours. PHS-8: During final design, Pacific Power will limit the conductor surface gradient to meet the IEEE Radio Noise Guideline. PHS-9: During construction, objects such as fences, metal building, pipelines, and other metal objects within or near the ROW corridor that have the possibility for induced potentials and currents will be identified and electrical grounding of these objects will be implemented according to Pacific Power and NESC standards. PHS-10: During final design and construction, Pacific Power will identify areas where large equipment is anticipated and provide sufficient conductor clearance to ground to meet the NESC five milliampere rule or limit the size or access of large equipment. PHS-11: Pacific Power will provide a public liaison before and during construction to respond to questions and concerns from neighboring entities and persons, including residents, about noise and other construction disturbances and or concerns. PHS-12: Pacific Power will establish a method for receiving questions, concerns or complaints during construction (e.g., toll-free telephone number, email, address, website) and develop procedures for responding to callers. 2.4 ALTERNATIVES 2.4.1 Route Segments To present the analysis results clearly and to compare impacts, Action Alternatives consist of a combination of discrete route segments, forming nine end-to-end Action Alternatives (see Figure 2-1). Route segments were developed based on land ownership and jurisdiction, land cover and terrain, and potential Design Options. Table 2-6 presents route segment lengths comprising all Action Alternatives. As described in Section 1.14.1, the DEIS Route Segment 1a and SDEIS Route Segment NNR-1 followed a similar alignment; however, in response to landowner comments, modifications were made to Route Segment 1a and were reflected in Route Segment NNR-1 analyzed in the SDEIS. Based on landowner comments received on the SDEIS, Route Segment 1a/NNR-1 was further refined for the FEIS. All other Route Segments remain identical to those presented in the DEIS and SDEIS. Descriptions of each of the Route Segments are presented below. Table 2-6 Route Segment Lengths ROUTE SEGMENT LENGTH (MILES) 1a/NNR-1 2.4 1b 12.5 1c 12.9 2a 1.0 2b 16.3 2c 18.1 2d 7.0 3a 0.1 3b 21.7 3c 25.2 NNR-2 5.1 NNR-3 9.3