Laserfiche WebLink
III. Zoning and Development Standards <br /> <br />The proposed project is classified as a “Special Utility” under Kittitas County Code section 17.61.010(2)(b). <br />Kittitas County Code permits utilities in all zoning districts and notes that existing utility corridors should be <br />utilized whenever reasonable. This project is being proposed under KCC 17.60A.015 and 17.61.030. This use is a <br />Conditional Use and requires that the following be met: <br /> <br /> <br />KCC 17.60A.015 Review Criteria <br />1. The proposed use is essential or desirable to the public convenience and not detrimental or injurious to the <br />public health, peace, or safety or to the character of the surrounding neighborhood. <br />Applicant Response: “The project is desirable to the public convenience because it minimizes the potential for <br />redistributed loads and the over loading of the adjacent transmission system and will ensure continued reliable <br />and efficient service to the Yakima Valley. It will also address future reliability issues within the Mid- <br />Columbia transmission system.” The FEIS process addressed any potential public health and safety impacts <br />(Index #34). <br />Staff Response: GPO 6.6 of the Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan states that expansion of utility facilities <br />is primarily the responsibility of the utility providers. Pacific Power describes the need for the construction of <br />this 230kV line as necessary to ensure “continued reliable and efficient service to the Yakima Valley.” GPO <br />6.18 requires that utility facility decisions complement regional demand and reinforce an interconnected <br />regional distribution network. A combination of these GPO’s suggests that the proposed project is “essential <br />and desirable” to the public convenience and determined as necessary by Pacific Power. The FEIS issued in <br />October 2016 addresses in detail potential safety and health risks associated with the project, and the chosen <br />alternative mitigates for, or strategically avoids, these issues. Most of the land the proposed transmission line <br />will cross is not private and is characterized by sage lands and un-irrigated lands. <br />2. The proposed use at the proposed location will not be unreasonably detrimental to the economic welfare <br />of the county and that it will not create excessive public cost for facilities and services by finding that <br />a. The proposed use will be adequately serviced by existing facilities such as highways, <br />roads, police and fire protection, irrigation and drainage structures, refuse disposal, water <br />and sewers, and schools; or <br />b. The applicant shall provide such facilities; or <br />c. The proposed use will be of sufficient economic benefit to offset additional public costs <br />or economic detriment. <br />Applicant Response: “Project access will typically occur from existing highways and roads within the project <br />area. Upgrades to some existing roads, and construction of some new roads will be necessary. Roads existing <br />prior to construction will be left in a condition equal to or better than their condition prior to construction.” <br />“The Project will not be expected to cause significant demands on public service or facilities. During <br />construction, public services such as police, fire, and medical facilities would be needed only in cases of <br />emergency.” “The Project does not require drainage structure, refuse disposal, water or sewer connections.” <br /> “The proposed project can result in both short and long-term benefits for the local and regional economies in <br />Kittitas County. These benefits include the creation of new jobs and an increase in regional income, sales and <br />income tax revenues, property tax revenues, and right-of-way rental receipts to the federal government.” (see <br />index #7, Project Narrative 2.7.2). <br />Staff Response: <br />Index # 33