My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res-2018-197
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Res-2018-197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2018 10:00:00 AM
Creation date
12/11/2018 9:57:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/4/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
o
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution for the 2019 Distressed County Sales and Use Tax Infrastructure Improvement Program Agreement with Washington State Horse Park Authority
Order
15
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
49668
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$136 spent per person per day. Be~ause these expenditures are primarily for tourist <br />services. we assume that 82% of expenditures will impact the local economy. The <br />remaining 18% wi,11 go to vendors who travel to the county for these events, and are <br />therefore not considered "local.11 <br />Findings of the Impact Model <br />We applied the impact model only to the results of Scenarios 3 and 4, the "most likelt <br />feasibility models; both were based upon the same starting numbers of horses across <br />the years of analysis. As the Impact model results are linear functions of the number of <br />horses and therefore visitors. impacts for the other feasibility runs can be easily <br />calculated. Table 9 shows the logic and results of the model. let us use the Year Six <br />co1u·mn to show the impact of the horse park ln its maturity stage. DJrect participant <br />expenditures of $7,334,838 are shown on line 1; these are comprised of the number of <br />hors~s. times the number of participants per hors~. times the spending at $138 p~r day. <br />Line 1 is next margined at 95% to reflect the fact that 95% of participants are from <br />outside the county. (Expenditures by In-county participants are netted out as It is <br />assumed that this money would be spent in the county even without the horse park.) <br />This 111arglning yields the $6,968,096 in line 2, spending by participants on the local <br />market. Line 3 gives the $347,540 of expenditures made by the horse park <br />administn:ltion; it is calculated by multiplying horse park expenses by 48% to account <br />for expenses that flow Into the local economy; the remaining 52% will be spent outside <br />the local area. The sum of these two categories of local expenses (local spending by <br />participants, shown in line 2 plus spending on horse park operations, shown on line 3) <br />appears as $7,315,636 in line 4 as local total direct expenditures. These, in tum are <br />multiplied by the local (county) multiplier of 1.15 to yield local total impacts, shown lil <br />line 5. This number, $8,412,982 represents the total money flows, including indirect <br />and induced effects in the local economy that are attributable to the horse park. Using <br />the employment multiplier of 17 jobs per million dollars of direct expenditures glves us <br />41 <br />•':',
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.