My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res-2018-197
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Res-2018-197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2018 10:00:00 AM
Creation date
12/11/2018 9:57:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/4/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
o
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution for the 2019 Distressed County Sales and Use Tax Infrastructure Improvement Program Agreement with Washington State Horse Park Authority
Order
15
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
49668
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
facility. When modeling changing revenue over time, we focus on the number of horse -days (one horse using the facility one day) and the average revenue per horse. This <br />ignores non-equestrian sources of revenue, which we will address below. <br />The number of horse days, and therefore revenue, depends on the number of events <br />hosted by the Horse Park, and the number of horses per event. While examining the <br />experience of other horse parks may be informative, demand for a facility may vary <br />dramatically from location to location, depending on such factors as the horse <br />population density of the area surrounding the perk, the number and quality of <br />competing parks, and the length of the season. Obviously the factors that make <br />demand large In such a location as Los Angeles may or may not apply in Washington. <br />Given this, we estimated demand several ways. using differing methods and <br />assumptions. The demand estimate from the 1998 version of this study simply <br />multiplied the numb.er of stalls (400} times the number of weekend days the facility <br />would be open (64 days or 32 weekends), for a total number of horse days of 25,600. <br />This underesti!llated demand because it ignored the fact that most events will run from <br />three to five days. But it significantly overestimated demand, for it assumed that most <br />events will include the maximum number of horses (400). It also assumes full capacity <br />for 32 weekends. A 26 weekend seasori runs from April through the end of September; <br />32 weekends requires 6 weekends dMded between March and October, which we <br />view as infeasible on grounds of the length of the horse show season and <br />weather/travel conditions. However, in one scenario descri~ed below we do assume <br />25,600 horse days, but this ·number is excessively optimistic. <br />In order to develop a more fact based demand model, we asked a local horse <br />enthusiast. Steve Busick, to perform a market survey. Mr. Busick called the officials of <br />most Washington equestrian organizations, and recorded the number of events <br />conducted by each organization per year, and the number of horses in each event. He <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.