Laserfiche WebLink
it~2 B11:!JD6E11l·NG F.OR GOOD SfAiJ:E <br />QFRIEPAltR <br />The County evaluated its transportation system <br />inventory and likely maintenance and preservation <br />needs over the next 20 years. Below, each element <br />of the County's inventory is described with annual <br />expenditure needs summarized at the end. <br />I PAVEMENT <br />The primary type of paved roadway under Kittitas <br />County's jurisdiction is Bituminous Surface Treated <br />Road. Bituminous surface treatment (BST), also <br />known as chip seal, is a lower-cost treatment that <br />has a short design life of approximately 7 years. The <br />county currently has 498-centerline miles of BST <br />paved roadways that are in fair to very good <br />condition (PSC more than 40). Performing an <br />overlay of a BST roadway is approximately $30,000 <br />per centerline mile. <br />Table 5, below, summarizes the annual investment <br />need for pavement preservation based on this <br />inventory. 75 miles of paved roadway are chip <br />sealed each year under the current maintenance <br />schedule. With a total of 498 miles of roadway this <br />means that the entire network is maintenanced <br />every 7 years, which is the design life of a chip seal <br />treatment. Consistent with Goal 5 of Sustainably <br />Funded and Maintains What We Have, this plan <br />recommends continuing the current maintenance <br />schedule and associated expenditures to keep the <br />roadways in good repair. <br />I GRAVEL ROADS <br />While paved roads make up the majority of the <br />County road network, Kittitas County also maintains <br />64 miles of gravel roads. While gravel is less <br />expensive than chip sealing, gravel roads only have a <br />design life of one year and must be maintained more <br />frequently. Historically the County has budgeted <br />enough to perform the necessary annual <br />maintenance to keep all of the gravel roads in good <br />repair and it is recommended that this maintenance <br />plan continue. <br />l OTHER SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE <br />While pavement preservation is the primary cost <br />related to County roads, there are other important <br />elements to consider, including shoulders, culverts <br />and drainage features, pedestrian facilities, <br />guardrail, concrete barriers, signals and signage. <br />Table 5 summarizes costs associated with these and <br />other maintenance preservation activities over the <br />life of this plan. <br />I OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES <br />There are a variety of regular operations that must <br />take place to keep the transportation network in <br />good repair. These include vegetation control, snow <br />and ice control, and the operations associated with <br />pedestrian crossings, paths and trails, and litter clean <br />up. <br />I BRIDGES <br />As described earlier, there are 268 bridges under <br />Kittitas County's jurisdiction and ten are considered <br />functionally obsolete or structurally deficient. To <br />protect the safety and continued mobility of Kittitas <br />County residents and businesses, this Plan <br />recommends continuing the current practice of <br />rehabilitating one bridge each year. It is assumed <br />that the cost to rehabilitate a bridge is <br />approximately $2 million, a conservative estimate to <br />ensure that enough funds are available to cover all <br />project costs and any unforeseen costs. Currently <br />the majority of this cost is being borne by the <br />County, so assuming no outside funding the cost to <br />the County of retrofitting these bridges would be <br />approximately $20 million over the next 10 years. <br />In addition to the 10 identified deficient bridges, 97 <br />bridges on the County's inventory will meet or <br />exceed their 75-year design life within the 20-year <br />horizon of this document. Continuing to prioritize <br />and budget $2 million annually after addressing the <br />10 deficient bridges provides enough money based <br />on currently estimated costs to make substantial <br />progress on these additional bridges as repairs are <br />needed. The cost for bridge replacement is included <br />in the project list in Table 11 (page 53). <br />I MAJOR FINDINGS <br />It is worthwhile to note that this analysis suggests <br />that the County's historical investments in <br />preservation, maintenance, and related operations <br />are not sufficient to cover the expected operational <br />costs for the next 20 years. The County will need to <br />potentially consider additional funding sources for <br />transportation in order to meet the operational <br />45 IP age