My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-165 Transportation Plan
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
10. October
>
2018-10-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2018-165 Transportation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2018 11:42:40 AM
Creation date
10/19/2018 11:40:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/16/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
s
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Adopting the Kittitas County Twenty Year (2018-2038) Transportation Plan
Order
19
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
48517
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Woods & Steele Road to Graham Road <br />No improvements are assumed for I-90 or other state facilities. <br />All network coding was checked for the revisions. Capacities were recomputed for the <br />links and nodes. The Multi-Point Assignment (MP A) equivalencies were checked and <br />revised as necessary. Tum penalties were checked and revised as necessary. <br />Growth Scenarios <br />The four growth scenarios were analyzed run for both the no-build and build <br />conditions. PM Peak hour volumes were forecast and the links were plotted with colors <br />depicting ranges of volume/capacity ratios for the roads. Similar to the previously <br />displayed base year conditions, these colors range light green through dark green, <br />orange, red, and dark red to show increasing amounts of congestion. <br />Also, relative amounts of delay are shown for nodes or intersections using red dot. The <br />larger the red dot the more delay computed by the model. Intersections with large red <br />dots indicate potential problem locations. Graphics of each of the scenarios are shown <br />below with traffic volumes. <br />A comparison was made between alternatives to show the differences between land use <br />scenarios and the Build/No-Build conditions. Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and <br />Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) were summarized for the Kittitas County. The average <br />speed (VMT NHT) was computed for each of the scenarios also to facilitate <br />comparisons. <br />s ummacy C om_panson o f Al f terna 1ves <br />Scenario I VMT VHT VMT/VHT <br />No Build <br />Full Corridor <br />Development <br />Medium <br />Corridor <br />Development <br />Low Corridor <br />Kittitas County, Wa shington Transpor tation Mode l -May 200 9 P a ge 47
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.