My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-165 Transportation Plan
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
10. October
>
2018-10-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2018-165 Transportation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2018 11:42:40 AM
Creation date
10/19/2018 11:40:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/16/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
s
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Adopting the Kittitas County Twenty Year (2018-2038) Transportation Plan
Order
19
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
48517
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Calibration <br />Approach <br />Calibration is an iterative process and includes upgrading or adjusting entered data, <br />program coefficients, or parameters and assumptions on successive simulation runs <br />until the volumes and traffic patterns produced by the model approximate known <br />volumes within an "acceptable level of error." The acceptable level of error for calibrated <br />model data has been recommended in the National Cooperative Highway Research <br />Program Report No. 255 entitled Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning <br />and Design. The primary premise behind these guidelines is that simulated model data <br />should not significantly differ from actual count data thereby causing inappropriate <br />under-or over-design of roadway facilities. Differences between modeled volumes and <br />actual counts may look significant; however, in everyday practice, these differences <br />should not cause unsuitable roadway facility planning. <br />There are three significant points to consider. The first is "acceptable level of error" and <br />"How good are the counts?" Given that this is the basis for calibration, are these counts <br />good enough for the process? If some count data is questionable, can the model be <br />asked to simulate a condition better than the condition is known? <br />Considering these questions, it has been found through experience in modeling that an <br />"acceptable level of error" is directly related to the existing traffic volumes on a certain <br />link. Through the course of calibration, higher volume streets can be expected to have <br />better results. Acceptable limits may be that a 20% error can be expected on heavily <br />used arterials, 40% on primary collectors, and perhaps as high as 200% on little-used <br />rural collectors. Although the latter level of error may seem high, a variation of 200% on <br />little-used roadways may mean a difference of 25 to 100 vehicles, insufficient to cause <br />inappropriate facility planning when the model results are used. <br />The second point to consider is the adjustment of entered data, program parameters, <br />and model assumptions. After entering all the data and making the initial model <br />assumptions, the simulation distribution and assignment run is made. The desired <br />outcome is that the results will perfectly match all the counts and the model will be <br />calibrated. Usually, though, some data or assumptions (the "rules" of the model) are <br />incorrect. On locating the errors from the distribution and assignment, causes are <br />identified. The rules are reconsidered and adjusted. <br />Kittitas County, Washington Transportation Model-May 2009 Page 36
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.