My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
09. September
>
2018-09-04 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 1:29:17 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 1:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/4/2018
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider the Purchase of Real Estate Commonly Known as Parcel 611033, US 97/Old Hwy 10 Site, Ellensburg, WA.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
47527
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
39 My main concern with this site is its aesthetic appearance from I-90. I believe it <br />would be a eye sore in the middle of one of our counties agricultural areas. This <br />area gives a good visual representation of the agricultural importance of Kittitas <br />County to so many as they travel this section of the I-90 corridor. I also believe <br />either of the other two sites would be better served by the existing higher <br />capacity roads in close proximity to I-90. <br />40 Too far from most of town. There is only one route from town to the site and <br />that is along Canyon Road which is at times very busy. This would be my lowest <br />choice. It may also cost the most. I do not care for this site. <br />41 This site looks to me like it would much more suited to agricultural rather than a <br />transfer station. It also appears to cost the most so I would list it as number 3 on <br />list of solutions. <br />42 Last choice of the three. Should not be destroying more of our productive <br />farmland. Next to a scenic byway. Nothing scenic about a transfer station. <br />Streams and ponds close by. Impact on I-90 exit / entrance - would need <br />improvements. <br />43 Tjossem Road site should not be used at all. The nearby Sorenson Pond would <br />be adversely affected. Sorenson Pond is used by lots of birds and deserves to <br />not be impacted by the noise and traffic. <br />44 Poor existing roads for traffic and there is a nearby community neighborhood. <br />Looks like good farmland. Owner does not sound willing to sell. Worst of the 3 <br />choices. <br />45 - Makes the least sense - not traffic friendly, too far away - We need to protect <br />and keep our Timothy Hay crops! Owner is not willing to sell! <br />47 Trailer park next door. Area has a history of high water table during spring and <br />irrigation season. <br />48 This is near a prime migratory birding pond. I do not believe this site should be <br />considered as the noise and traffic will have a negative impact on the wildlife. <br />ResponseID Response <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.