My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
09. September
>
2018-09-04 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 1:29:17 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 1:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/4/2018
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider the Purchase of Real Estate Commonly Known as Parcel 611033, US 97/Old Hwy 10 Site, Ellensburg, WA.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
47527
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ResponseID Response <br />1 You may want to elaborate on the enclosed tipping floor design so people who <br />do not use the site can understand this is not just a pile of garbage waiting to be <br />blown around. Compatability with heavy truck traffic is important to avoid <br />resistance from residential housing areas. Thanks for reaching out to the public <br />in this important project <br />2 Instead of all loads going I90 for Criteria as anyone talked to the hauler to see if <br />at airport and cement site they would utilize hyw 97? Why is there no where to <br />process recycling on new sites? Couldn't this be a source of income for the <br />county? <br />3 Please think this project through carefully, this is an expensive investment with <br />long term impacts and consequences if not done right. <br />4 The acquisition costs for each of the sites is important. But if the site is to be <br />permanent (which I assume it is because I heard we don't want to have to do this <br />again) the Airport site is potentially the more expensive because of possible <br />lease rate increases. Also, it's surrounded by currently developed areas. This <br />makes future expansion impossible. The cement plant site or the Tjossem site <br />are preferable in this area. <br />5 Everybody wants ever available amenity but nobody wants it in their backyard. <br />The current location doesn't seem to be affecting the growth or economic <br />development in the surrounding area. There have been several new businesses <br />built near the current location since the current Transfer Station was built. <br />8 Keep it out of the residential areas. Big trucks and kids do not mix. <br />9 I don't think you are acquiring too much land. The Tjossen site would make a <br />handy place for a lot of public entities to use i.e. County and State public works <br />shops, State Patrol etc. Rent it to them until you need the whole thing. Good <br />luck! <br />10 Use land that is not farm land. <br />12 Put it somewhere out of site of neighbors! <br />5.Any other thoughts for the team to consider as they select the preferred <br />site? <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.