My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
09. September
>
2018-09-04 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
Final Site Selection Report Kittitas_082118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 1:29:17 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 1:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/4/2018
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider the Purchase of Real Estate Commonly Known as Parcel 611033, US 97/Old Hwy 10 Site, Ellensburg, WA.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
47527
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ResponseID Response <br />1 This would be my last choice. You will experience resistance in taking good <br />agricultural ground out of production similar to a utility scale solar proposed just <br />East of that site. It would not expose existing residential housing to truck traffic <br />and it is reasonably close to the interstate but utilities are not close and road <br />improvements would be necessary. <br />2 Worst site furthest away from population center and from population center <br />only one way in Canyon Road under I90 which is already a traffic jam. This would <br />focus 90% or users to go down this path creating a nightmare. Also Barry road is <br />a narrow road and there is not much you can do on the south end of Barry road <br />to make it better. I believe missed the mark on this one and only loads going out <br />was considered not what is coming in. <br />3 High ground water levels and probably expensive farm ground, but this would be <br />my second choice. <br />4 This site seems to have the best of both worlds. It is close to the freeway yet far <br />enough away from residential areas do not cause a problem. I think the <br />acquisition and utility costs would outbalance that however. And personally this <br />site would cause me to have to drive farther than I do now and farther than the <br />other two sites. <br />5 There is a fish barring stream within the overlay as part of the project. Even if you <br />have a set back buffer area along the stream there will still be material blowing <br />into the stream that can affect the stream and be washing downstream to Wilson <br />Creek. There is also a stream that has been illegally redirected off the property <br />to enter Wilson Creek at a different location so potentially you could be dealing <br />with two fish barring streams. Of the three proposed sites this is the only one <br />that isn't zoned for light industrial. This site is zoned Commercial Ag. The County <br />is losing agricultural production land at a fast rate as it is we shouldn't be taking <br />land out of production for a Transfer Station that can be sited in an area already <br />zoned for industry. <br />6 The only concern I have with this location is there is already a problem with <br />yakima bringing their waste to Eburg. <br />4. What are your thoughts on the Tjossem Road site? <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.