Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 4 – SITE SCREENING AND SELECTION PROCESS <br />4-8 AX0622181133PDX <br />shows the weighted results using feedback from two different stakeholder groups. In the upper portion <br />of the table, the scores using weights established by City and County staff are represented, whereas in <br />the lower portion of the table, the scores using weights reflective of public comment are represented. <br />These results are summarized in Table 4-2. <br />Table 4-2. Summary of Total Weighted Scores <br />Kittitas County Transfer Station Site Selection Report <br />Site Total Scores Using City/County <br />Weights <br />Total Scores Using Public Weights <br />Site 1: Cement Plant Site 50.9 73.3 <br />Site 25: Tjossem Road Site 43.5 46.9 <br />Site 33: US 97/Old Highway 10 Site 70.9 77.7 <br /> <br />As shown in Table 4-2, regardless of whether the City/County or Public Comment weights were used, <br />the US 97/Old Highway 10 Site had the best overall score, followed by the Cement Plant Site, and then <br />the Tjossem Road Site. Figures B-1 and B-2 in Appendix B provide additional summaries of these results. <br />Figure B-1 shows stacked bar charts for the final weighted scores (for both City/County and Public <br />Comment results). These bar charts illustrate the relative impact of each secondary screening criterion <br />on the overall score. Figure B-2 is a plot of the overall scores of each site (for both City/County and <br />Public Comment results) versus the estimated acquisition and development costs that were calculated <br />for each site. As shown on Figure B-2, Site 25 (Tjossem Road Site) has the highest cost and the lowest <br />score. Site 33 (US 97/Old Highway 10 Site) has the highest score and a moderate acquisition and <br />development cost.