Laserfiche WebLink
Item 2: Addressing and utilities can be installed without an address. <br />Item 3: Please review attached memo from ESM responding to Mark Cook’s memo, Department of Public <br />works. <br />Environmental Health: <br />Item B-1: No DOH approval of the water system is required; a water availability letter will be provided by <br />Suncadia Water Company, LLC. <br />Department of Fish and Wildlife: <br />Please refer to critical areas assessment. <br />Alfonso letter: <br />There are no minimum lot sizes or densities required for Suncadia, and neither are SDP or county review <br />items. See Exhibit J to the Development Agreement. The proposed Phase 3 Division 14 SDP is consistent <br />with the Phase 3 Divisions 6-9 Site Development Plan approved on March 23, 2005. <br />Thomas letter: <br />A.1. <br />To the extent the Site Development Plan (the "SDP") drawing may not have shown the building envelopes,it <br />hasbeenupdated. TheSDPincludesmorethanjustthesiteplan,andtheSDPnarrativeindicatesthatparking <br />is to be on the lots. The Suncadia design guidelines restrict parking on lots to building envelopes and <br />driveways,andExhibitJtotheDevelopmentAgreementonlyrequiresthatbuildingenvelopesbeshown. See <br />Design Guideline Section 2.9 Garages and Parking. On lot parking is not a county review item, nor is <br />compliance with the Suncadia design guidelines. <br />There is no requirement to detail the use of proposed open space tract OS-1 beyond "community and <br />recreationalactivities"whichis arecognizedcategoryof open space as provided in ExM totheDevelopment <br />Agreement. At present, there are no plans to develop this parcel in any fashion. Ultimately, that parcel will <br />be transferred to the HOA which will control and manage its use. <br />The relationship to all adjacent land is referenced in the application "Narrative" in its section (3) and is <br />consistent with the requirements of Section 4.1(d)(9) of the Development Agreement. Further, parcels on <br />Cabin Trail Drive are not adjacent to Tract Z-1 as that term is defined by the Development Agreement. <br />The proposed staging plan in the application lists the estimated timing of and adequately describes the only <br />Index #27