Laserfiche WebLink
Heather Seibert (SH) <br />From: no -rep Iy _Se rvice Req u ests@co.kittitas.w a. u s <br />Tuesday, June 06,20174:02 PM Sent: <br />To: Heather Seibert (SH) <br />Cc: Kim Dawson; Darren Higashiyama <br />Subject: Prosecutor Service Request I 39769 I Service Agreement -Mission Support Alliance, LLC <br />and US DOE <br />Heather Seibert, <br />Thank you for submitting a service request. We hope the service was completed to your satisfaction. If you'd like to leave feedback, <br />please use our feedback form. <br />We have closed this request. If you need anything else, please submit another request or ,renew th is (eguesl. <br />Note: This email was sent from an unmonitored account. Please do not reply to this email. To respond, please update your service <br />request on CAMAS using the link below. <br />Request #39769 -Service Agreement -Mission Support Alliance, LLC and US <br />DOE <br />Initial request: <br />Doug, per our conversation, Darren just got this from HAMMER yesterday, and needs to send it <br />back to them by end of day 6/19 . It is a service contract, which I think would make it more of a <br />PSA to acknolwdge rather than an interlocal that the BOCC needs to sign, but please correct me <br />if I am wrong. :) I put a date of 2 weeks from today on it because of your office's policy; otherwise <br />whomever assigns it to you will have to change the date to adhere to the policy-but I really do <br />need it back by, say, 6/13 (sorry!). <br />Latest update: <br />Doug Mitchell 6/6/2017 4:02:17 PM <br />Resolution: <br />Note that on P. 1, Article III section C, we have to indemnify the Gov?MSA for any (bad <br />outcomes involving damage/injury and resulting liability exposure). Considering that almost <br />exclusively, such would be to our own personnel, and we have the Worker's compensation and <br />other exposure anyway, this is not likely to increase risk . <br />Don't forget to fill in the contact provisions under V. Notice . :-) /' <br />I sure hope someone over there knows the meaning of all these acronyms such as HFACTS . <br />The language on P. 3 seems to imply that the training will be to Hanford's lesson plan .... even <br />though SO instructors are doing it. Is that intended? Similar language on P. 4. <br />You will need a copy of Appendix B for each deputy to sign. <br />I concur that this is not an interlocal, but does need to be acknowledged , although ... I wonder if <br />this under the limit adopted a while back and could be done on the Sheriffs signature. (Not really <br />a course I would advocate very often, but not prohibited, either.) <br />So, the words you really n <br />Status: <br />1