My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
License App Notice
>
Meetings
>
2013
>
12. December
>
2013-12-12 2:00 PM - options related to the growth and processing of marijuana in Kittitas County
>
License App Notice
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2018 1:02:32 AM
Creation date
5/9/2018 1:21:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/12/2013
Meeting title
options related to the growth and processing of marijuana in Kittitas County
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Special
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J c-& <br /> CD's <br /> 19?1r.. <br /> Julie Kjorsvik <br /> From: JoAnne Duncan <joanneduncan990@yahoo.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:49 AM <br /> To: Kittitas County Commissioners Office <br /> Subject: PLEASE READ THE RESEARCH on what other COUNTIES ARE DOING ABOUT <br /> MARIJUANA!!!!! WE DO HAVE CONTROL!!! <br /> Dear County Commissioners, <br /> I am very unclear about why you all keep saying their is nothing our county can do about I502 <br /> when everything I research and read states other wise. The link below is to the Muncipal <br /> Research and Services Center of Washington (M.R.S.C) They have a detailed sample list of 58 <br /> cities/counties in our state showing what each local government is doing to best protect the <br /> integrity, safety, and future of their citizens. PLEASE check out the link! <br /> http://www.mrsc.org/subjects/legal/502/artdoc5O2.aspx#ord <br /> It seems like the citizens of Kittitas County have been abandoned. <br /> I am also concerned about what is still considered Ag 20. It may be called Ag 20 but it has been <br /> divided in to small residential parcels. Large Pot Grow operations need to be placed in areas <br /> away from homes. We are not talking about an ordinary agricultural product. We are talking <br /> about a Federally illegal drug. It doesn't fit with the rural landscape. <br /> The quote below is also from the M.R.S.C. web site and makes it clear that indeed each city and <br /> county can create their own zoning. I have also spoke with the Liquor Control Board and they <br /> told me the same thing. They do not control where operations go, they only pass out the license. <br /> It also states from the Federal Department of Justice website <br /> http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/dag/speeches/2013/dag-speech-13 0910.html <br /> "That each county and city will be responsible for addressing marijuana activity through their <br /> own drug laws. The Department of Justice expects that states and local governments that have <br /> enacted laws authorizing marijuana growing, processing, consumption, and selling have strong <br /> local law enforcement efforts backed by adequate funding." This seems to contradict the <br /> following quote in the Daily record from Doc Hansen: <br /> "The county is stressing that it is up to the state and federal government to regulate and enforce <br /> all other rules on (legally) growing marijuana," Hansen said. <br /> The information below is also taken from the M.R.S.0 web site and states once again that cities <br /> and counties can ZONE marijuana businesses into one specific zone! <br /> "Note that the Liquor Control Board will ]lot issue a license for a marijuana business in a <br /> personal residence. WAC 314-55-015(5). But, a marijuana business could establish itself in the <br /> commercial or industrial zones directly adjacent to a residential zone, if, of course, that is <br /> allowed by local zoning. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.