My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
License App Notice
>
Meetings
>
2013
>
12. December
>
2013-12-12 2:00 PM - options related to the growth and processing of marijuana in Kittitas County
>
License App Notice
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2018 1:02:32 AM
Creation date
5/9/2018 1:21:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/12/2013
Meeting title
options related to the growth and processing of marijuana in Kittitas County
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Special
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Julie Kjorsvik <br /> From: JoAnne Duncan <joanneduncan440@yahoo.com> <br /> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:28 PM <br /> To: Kittitas County Commissioners Office <br /> Subject: No Marijuana in Kittitas County <br /> Dear County Commissioners, <br /> I have been researching what other counties are doing in regards to the passage of 1502. Many are <br /> banning or putting long term moratoriums on producing, growing and retail sales of marijuana. <br /> We keep hearing from you that as a county our hands are tied to what the State/Liquor Board wants <br /> us to do however I recently spoke with Anna Cox, a representative from the Washington State <br /> Liquor Board for Marijuana Licensing and she said that each county can do whatever they want. <br /> The quote in red is from the Seattlepi and backs up what the representative from the Liquor Board <br /> stated. There have also been cases which have been successful in implementing a full ban such as <br /> Redmond Ridge. Others have implemented strict zoning only allowing in Industrial areas and many <br /> implementing on going moratoriums <br /> The Washington State Liquor Control Board says it won't sue a city or county because it's not <br /> harmed by the ban. The board is going to issue licenses, and if a business that gets one is in a <br /> jurisdiction that has an effective ban in place, that's between the jurisdiction and the business. <br /> Also in regards to that comment some people putting in for licenses have listed an address that <br /> they do not own or have a lease agreement on. They would have to reapply for a license so I doubt <br /> they would turn around and sue the county. This is what I was told by the State Liquor Board <br /> http://blog.seattlepi.com/marijuana/2013/12/12/bans-moratoriums-and-zoning-approvals-for- <br /> marijuana-businesses-as-far-as-we-know/#18413103=35&18853101=1 <br /> http://www.mrse.org/subjects/le,gal/502/artdoc5O2.qux <br /> I am also wondering about the GMA and how an activity which needs razor wire fencing, 24 hour <br /> surveillance, lighting and emits a terrible odor (see links below from Colorado) fits in with the <br /> preservation of the rural character of Kittitas County. Agricultural products such as hay, corn, <br /> cattle, horses, haystacks, barns, and corrals fit in and even enhance the rural quality and nature of <br /> our valley. Products that require extreme security measures and emit horrible odors do not fit in <br /> our rural neighborhoods and devalue the property of farmers, ranchers and rural land owners. It <br /> states in the Sepa Checklist from the Washington State Liquor Board that these extreme measures <br /> are necessary because of the increased rate of home invasions and crime. Also stated in the <br /> Thomson Reuters Report, Washington Supreme Court requires Kittitas County to protect working <br /> farms, rural areas and water resources, "The GMA specifically provides that counties may <br /> implement innovative zoning techniques in rural areas. This is our opportunity to demonstrate and <br /> uphold our responsibility to protect the rural character and resources of farmers, ranchers, and rural <br /> land owners. <br /> I appreciate your time and effort in making the most responsible decisions based off of the will of <br /> the voters of Kittitas County(who voted against i502) and taking time to wait and see how other <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.