PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)

Home Browse Search

SEPA MARIAN MEADOWS MITIGATION MEASURES 113 For Discussions Purposes Only— Sept 10, 2016 Regular text prepared by Applicant Italics font text prepared by County Ravicinnc and arlrlitinnc fnr 9018 nrnnneni Page 15 of 17 53900-2 ELEMENT No. ADDRESSED IN Summary of Impacts Summary of Possible Mitigation Applicant Response County Initial Response' COUNTY'S MAY 20, (From County 5120111 letter) (Alternative Mitigation) 2011 LETTER 15B Public Service - Schools 15.2 Schools— The proposed development mitigation payment, at time of filing for final, shall The school district should be consulted and any payment i) In order to provide for mitigation of impacts has a range of potential adverse impacts on be paid to the Easton School District to be should be fully justified. There should be a distinction made on school facilities proportionate to the schools. Approval of a PUD with up to 443 deposited in a mitigation account with the County for the existing lack of facilities for existing students vs. any impacts produced by the project, at the time lots occupied by full-time residents would Treasurer; school transportation mitigation increase in students. The tenure alternatives do not fully of filing of a final subdivision or approval of require increasing the capacity of the existing (buses) substantiate the increase in students and the need for other development within the PUD a school to serve about 260 additional students, additional facilities. mitigation payment shall be made to the about 2 and a half times the present capacity. Easton School District, to be deposited in a The residential community that might result if The 2016 development proposal is for 89 dwelling units designated mitigation account with the County PUD approval for this property provides the which is most closely represented within the FEIS as Treasurer to mitigate the facility impacts of precedent for similar development of other Allemate 45. The applicant's expectations are that Tenure the proposal. The payments may be spent properties would result in up to 850 additional Scenario #4 as delineated in Table 3-18 will best represent only on new school facilities and administered students resulting in an increase of about 8 expectations for this proposal with the majority of residential in accordance with RCW 82.02.070.01. times the existing capacity. There is no use being seasonal/recreation in its early stages. Provided that if Kittitas County adopts a assurance of state funding of school school impact fee in accordance with RCW expansion. If available, such funding would In relationship to school impacts, the expected increase in 82.02, said fees shall take the place of this generally cover up to 70 percent of the cost. the near term for student enrollment will most likely bring mitigation payment for lots within phases for The cost of instruction and transportation levels back to those of 2003 with 123 students, which a final plat has not been filed at the would increase proportionally to the increase time of institution of said fee. in the number of students. (ii) provide for mitigation of impacts on school facilities, building and equipment, proportionate to the impacts produced by the project. (iii) provide for mitigation of impacts on school transportation facilities proportionate to the impacts produced by the project. 15C Public Service — Police & 15.3 Police & Public Safety- Impacts are no applicant mitigation No mitigation Because there is a limited direct mitigation that Public Safety relatively minor from a cumulative could be accomplished by the project, mitigation perspective. is likely to be primarily a general government expense related to growth as a whole and not readily segregated for this development. 15D Public Service - Medical 15.4 Medical Response - Impacts are no applicant mitigation no mitigation Because there is limited direct mitigation that Response relatively minor from a cumulative could be accomplished by the project, mitigation perspective. is likely to be primarily a special district expense related to growth as a whole and not readily segregated for this development. Page 15 of 17 53900-2