My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-143 <br />Within Kittitas County, the Okanogan/Wenatchee Ranger District is responsible for fire protection of <br />National Forest lands. Through cooperative agreements with agencies, such as DNR, service districts <br />assist other agencies and jurisdictions with wildland fire protection and suppression. Fire protection <br />assistance to county rural fire protection districts is requested from the U.S. Forest Service through DNR. <br />2 What mandates or standards for fire protection service have been established? <br />Kittitas County has adopted the following polices: <br />GPO 2.109G Kittitas County will consider creating a wildfire protection policy tied to land use zoning <br />that will protect both the private landowner and public lands from wildfire. When the use of <br />forested lands is changed, the party doing the changing is responsible for providing a fire- <br />resistant buffer around the property. <br />GPO 2.139 Kittitas County will encourage rural developments in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) <br />and the owners of adjacent commercial forest lands to develop Community Wildfire <br />Protection Plans (CWPPs). <br />The emergency medical response standard adopted in the Kittitas County Emergency Medical Services <br />Standards for Fire District No. 3 is 20 minutes within a 5-mile radius of its station. <br />The standard for Hospital District No. 2 to respond to the Easton area, which is about 17 miles from its <br />station, is 45 minutes or less (KCEMS 2006). According to the local fire chief, actual response times to <br />the area north of I-90 are in the 8- to 12-minute range (McCaw 2008). <br />There are a variety of measures of fire protection effectiveness in a community. The factors discussed <br />below are based on a model developed by the Center for Public Safety Excellence, Inc. (CPSE 2006) and <br />includes the following: <br />Fire Risk <br />The characteristics of an individual community will affect the level of fire risk to protect against. For <br />example, older buildings pose a different set of problems than new buildings built to modern construction <br />codes. Commercial and industrial occupancies pose additional factors to be considered. Construction, <br />occupancy type, water supply, exposure between buildings, modern furniture and furnishings, and the <br />risks which the combination of these factors pose to the occupants constitute the fire risk component. <br />An additional critical factor in determining the level of fire risk to protect against is the assessment of <br />consequences. Fires result in deaths, personal injuries, and property loss, including damage to the <br />environment. Additional factors, such as the historical value of certain properties and the tax assessment <br />value of property in the community, are also considered. In many cases, the loss of a particular occupancy <br />in a community, such as a major employer or a public facility such as a school, has an adverse impact on <br />the local economy or community values.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.