My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-89 <br />Table 3-12. Cumulative 443 Units with PUD Density Trip Generation <br /> Net New Trips <br />Proposed Land Use Dwelling <br />Units <br />ITE <br />Code Total In Out <br />Project – Single-Family <br />Detached Housing 443 210 409 258 151 <br />Cumulative - with PUD <br />Density 567 210 584 368 216 <br />Total Development 993 626 367 <br />22 Would the cumulative effects change the roadways that serve the area? <br />As described above, when considering the cumulative effects of the project, traffic volumes in the study <br />area would increase and the magnitude of increase would vary greatly depending on the tenure scenario <br />and whether or not the adjacent areas are assumed to be developed under the existing rural zoning or PUD <br />density. <br />Depending on the amount of growth and development within the study area, it is possible that some <br />roadways could warrant a change in functional classification to be consistent with traffic volumes that are <br />using the roadways. Substantial increases in traffic volumes could result in minor designations being <br />changed to major classifications. However, because the transportation system would be used in a similar <br />fashion with respect to general mobility, direct property access, roadway network, travel patterns, etc., <br />and the need for improvements would likely be limited to one or two intersections, it is unlikely that the <br />functional classifications would require changes. Therefore, despite substantial traffic volume increases, <br />the functional classifications of the roadways in the study area are expected to remain the same as today. <br />23 Would the cumulative effects change the expected level of service? <br />The new trips generated from the project and development of nearby areas would increase the traffic <br />volumes on the transportation network and would change the LOS conditions. Accounting for the land <br />use development assumptions of the project and the surrounding areas, and traffic volume forecasts <br />described under Question 5, the 2020 future year LOS conditions for cumulative conditions were <br />analyzed. The results are summarized and compared to the No Build 2020 conditions in Table 3-13. PM <br />peak hour volumes for all the cumulative scenarios are shown in Figures 3-13 to 3-16.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.