My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-68 <br />Table 3-8. Existing 2008, No-Build 2020, and Build 2020 LOS Summary <br />Intersection Name <br /> <br /> Build 2020 <br />Existing 2008 No-Build 2020 226 Units 443 Units <br />PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour <br />LOS Delay <br />(sec/veh) LOS Delay <br />(sec/veh) LOS Delay <br />(sec/veh) LOS Delay <br />(sec/veh) <br />I-90 Eastbound/Railroad Street A 9.3 A 9.5 B 11.5 B 14.4 <br />I-90 Westbound/Railroad Street A 8.8 A 8.9 A 9.8 B 10.8 <br />Sparks Road/Railroad Street A 9.2 A 9.3 B 10.7 B 12.4 <br />Sparks Road/Turtle Town A 8.7 A 8.7 A 9.5 B 10.3 <br />Sparks Road/Pit Way A 9.1 A 9.2 B 11.0 B 13.1 <br />Sparks Road/Country Drive A 8.4 A 8.4 A 8.8 A 9.2 <br />Sparks Road/Project Access NA NA NA NA A 8.6 A 8.9 <br />sec/veh = seconds per vehicle <br />Because collisions result from several environmental and driver factors, there is no collision forecasting <br />methodology that is accepted industry-wide. In general, however, the potential for collisions increases as <br />traffic volumes increase. While the frequency of collisions in the study area can be expected to increase <br />in the future, without the project and more so with the project, quantifying the magnitude of increase is <br />not practical. Nonetheless, based on the total traffic volumes and existing collision frequency (0.66 <br />collisions per year) that is substantially below a level of concern, traffic safety is not expected to be a <br />substantial problem in the future with or without the project. <br />17 Would pedestrian, bicycle, and other off-road use and facilities be affected? <br />There are no planned non-motorized improvement projects identified within the study area that would be <br />affected by the project alternatives. Therefore, without or with the project, the future non-motorized <br />system within the study area is expected to be similar to the existing conditions. <br />With the substantial increases in traffic volumes, roadways previously shared by motorized and non- <br />motorized travel modes could pose safety concerns. Although the amount of non-motorized activity in the <br />study area is relatively low, the demand from this development and others may increase non-motorized <br />demand in the future. This may be especially pronounced in Alternative 2 with a multi-family <br />component. To accommodate pedestrians and children on bicycles, sidewalks and signage may become <br />desirable to reduce the potential for vehicle-to-pedestrian collisions. State law (RCW 58.17.110) requires <br />that subdivisions provide safe public walkways for school children from residences to schools or to bus <br />stops. <br />Traffic hazards are especially a concern for winter snowmobile use when plowed road areas are narrow <br />and both vehicle and snowmobiles may be operating at speeds that do not allow adequate stopping <br />distance or effective avoidance in cases of imminent collision.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.