My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-26 <br />More than half of Easton’s workforce <br />worked outside the county. This <br />compares with 17 percent for <br />residents of Cle Elum, 15 miles <br />away. Out-of-county workplaces <br />were likely to be located in King <br />County, because the destination was <br />readily accessible to the area via I- <br />90. Locations could range from <br />Snoqualmie Pass, located 15 miles <br />away, to the greater Seattle urban <br />area, located approximately 60 miles <br />away. <br />Kittitas County’s strongest employment sector is the government, which provides nearly 40 percent of all <br />non-farm jobs. The major government employers are Central Washington State University in Ellensburg, <br />state government offices, county government offices, and school districts. <br />Recent growth in employment has been primarily in the services sector. The largest sector is health care, <br />which includes employment in hospitals, the offices of physicians and dentists, and nursing homes, etc. <br />The amusement and recreation services sector is the next largest, with social services third. Average <br />wages in the service sector are relatively low (Mesick 2002). <br />The choice of housing location depends on a number of factors that are weighed by individuals. <br />For persons in the workforce, primary considerations include: <br /> Cost in relation to their income. <br /> Family space needs, which vary by household size. <br /> Distance to workplace and cost of commuting (which are <br />affected by a variety of personal choices as well as cost and <br />income). <br /> Personal or cultural factors such as proximity to family and <br />social groups (ethnic, religious, or other groups one may <br />identify with). <br /> Factors relating to public services such as the character of <br />local schools and the availability of parks and recreation facilities. <br /> Amenities one may value that relate to the character of the area, such as the size of lots, open space, <br />vegetation diversity, proximity to recreation facilities, and other factors. <br />All of these criteria may play a part in the individual choice of location of residence. It is very difficult to <br />predict the factors that may weigh on an individual and even more difficult to predict the factors that will <br />lead to a choice of specific development and residence. <br />Several characteristics of the Easton workforce from the 2000 census provide some insight on this sector <br />of the community: <br /> The median family income was 82 percent of the state average, as compared to 71 percent for <br />Kittitas County as a whole. <br /> The percentage of the workforce in management and professional sectors was less than the state or <br />county average. <br /> The percentage of the workforce in resource-related jobs was more than twice the county average <br />and over four times the state average, but only approximately 10 percent of the area workforce.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.