My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 3-20 <br />What is the GMA? <br />The Growth Management Act, known <br />as the GMA (Chapter 36.70A RCW), <br />was adopted by the Legislature in <br />1990. The GMA was adopted <br />because the Washington State <br />Legislature found that <br />uncoordinated and unplanned <br />growth posed a threat to the <br />environment, sustainable economic <br />development, and the quality of life <br />in Washington. In 1991 the GMA was <br />amended to create the Growth <br />Management Hearings Boards to <br />hear and determine appeals of plans <br />required by local jurisdictions to <br />fulfill the requirements of the GMA. <br />In a public meeting in Easton held in <br />March 2005, 42 persons attended. <br />Their desires were summarized as: <br /> Preserving clean water supply that <br />meets drinking and fire suppression <br />needs; <br /> Preserving the community values of <br />open space and treed areas between <br />neighbors through retaining the <br />large-lot residential development <br />pattern; <br /> Preserving rural character; and <br /> Protecting wildlife. <br />6 What is meant by “rural land use” and how does the proposal relate to rural policies? <br />Rural land use has a range of generic and legal meanings. The <br />following discussion focuses on the Washington State GMA, <br />under RCW Chapter 36.70A, and what “rural” means in that <br />context. <br />The GMA contains a legislative statement of intent regarding <br />rural lands (RCW 36.70A.011). This statement recognizes the <br />importance of rural lands and rural character to Washington’s <br />economy, its people and environment, while respecting regional <br />differences. In addition, the Washington Legislature addresses <br />business development in rural areas by emphasizing flexibility in <br />retaining and expanding businesses. The Legislature mandates <br />that counties formulate a local vision of “rural character” that will <br />balance a number of goals. <br />The definition of “rural character” in RCW 36.70A.030 includes <br />patterns of land use and development: <br />(a) In which open space, the natural landscape, and vegetation predominate over the built environment; <br />(b) That foster traditional rural lifestyles, rural-based economies, <br />and opportunities to both live and work in rural areas; <br />(c) That provide visual landscapes that are traditionally found in <br />rural areas and communities; <br />(d) That are compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and <br />for fish and wildlife habitat; <br />(e) That reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land <br />into sprawling, low-density development; <br />(f) That generally do not require the extension of urban <br />governmental services; and <br />(g) That are consistent with the protection of natural surface water flows and groundwater and surface <br />water recharge and discharge areas.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.