My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 1-23 <br />Public Service – Mail Service <br />The likely impact of any of the cumulative impact scenarios under any alternative would result in mail <br />demand similar to a small town. Acquisition of a new post office with greatly expanded individual <br />mailboxes, or rural delivery, or both are the likely mitigating measures for increased demand for service. <br />Utilities – Water <br />The provision of additional storage east of I-90 would improve water service to that portion of the Easton <br />Water District Service Area. <br />Alternatives 1 and 2 with 443 units have substantially different water demand with different tenure <br />options. Tenure Scenarios 1 and 2 with a higher proportion of full-time residences (workforce and <br />retired) have substantially higher water demand. All the tenure options exceed the current Easton Water <br />District water rights of 137.2 acre-feet (ac-ft) per year with existing use of 71 ac-ft resulting in up to 61 <br />additional ac-ft per year available for new hookups. If the pending water rights application for an <br />additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, the resulting rights of 252 ac-ft per year would result in 178 <br />ac-ft available for new hookups. This amount would not be adequate for any options except Tenure <br />Scenario 4 with 50 percent seasonal residents. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing <br />platted lots and the land within the Limited Area of More Intense Rural Development (LAMIRD), the <br />district is not likely to have sufficient water rights for any scenarios. <br />Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4 water demand for 147 units is proportionally lower than Alternatives 1 and 2. <br />Tenure Scenarios 3 and 4with seasonal residents totaling 35 percent and 50 percent, respectively, are <br />within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for new hookups under the existing Easton Water District <br />water rights including only existing use. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing <br />platted lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, the district is not likely to have sufficient water rights. If <br />the pending water rights application for an additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, all tenure <br />scenarios would be adequately served by the 178 ac-ft available for new hookups. <br />Alternatives 3D and 5 water demand for 113 units is within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for <br />new hookups according to the existing Easton Water District water rights including only existing use. If <br />provision is made for reserving water supply for existing platted lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, <br />the district is not likely to have sufficient water rights. If the pending water rights application for an <br />additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, all tenure options would be adequately served by the 178 ac- <br />ft available for new hookups <br />Alternative 3C water demand for 33 units is within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for new <br />hookups including only existing use. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing platted <br />lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, the district is still likely to have sufficient water rights. One <br />consequence of the alternatives is the use of much of the existing capacity of the water system. If more <br />water is used by the Marian Meadows development, less is available for other users.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.