Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 1-23 <br />Public Service – Mail Service <br />The likely impact of any of the cumulative impact scenarios under any alternative would result in mail <br />demand similar to a small town. Acquisition of a new post office with greatly expanded individual <br />mailboxes, or rural delivery, or both are the likely mitigating measures for increased demand for service. <br />Utilities – Water <br />The provision of additional storage east of I-90 would improve water service to that portion of the Easton <br />Water District Service Area. <br />Alternatives 1 and 2 with 443 units have substantially different water demand with different tenure <br />options. Tenure Scenarios 1 and 2 with a higher proportion of full-time residences (workforce and <br />retired) have substantially higher water demand. All the tenure options exceed the current Easton Water <br />District water rights of 137.2 acre-feet (ac-ft) per year with existing use of 71 ac-ft resulting in up to 61 <br />additional ac-ft per year available for new hookups. If the pending water rights application for an <br />additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, the resulting rights of 252 ac-ft per year would result in 178 <br />ac-ft available for new hookups. This amount would not be adequate for any options except Tenure <br />Scenario 4 with 50 percent seasonal residents. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing <br />platted lots and the land within the Limited Area of More Intense Rural Development (LAMIRD), the <br />district is not likely to have sufficient water rights for any scenarios. <br />Alternatives 3A, 3B, and 4 water demand for 147 units is proportionally lower than Alternatives 1 and 2. <br />Tenure Scenarios 3 and 4with seasonal residents totaling 35 percent and 50 percent, respectively, are <br />within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for new hookups under the existing Easton Water District <br />water rights including only existing use. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing <br />platted lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, the district is not likely to have sufficient water rights. If <br />the pending water rights application for an additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, all tenure <br />scenarios would be adequately served by the 178 ac-ft available for new hookups. <br />Alternatives 3D and 5 water demand for 113 units is within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for <br />new hookups according to the existing Easton Water District water rights including only existing use. If <br />provision is made for reserving water supply for existing platted lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, <br />the district is not likely to have sufficient water rights. If the pending water rights application for an <br />additional 112 ac-ft per year were approved, all tenure options would be adequately served by the 178 ac- <br />ft available for new hookups <br />Alternative 3C water demand for 33 units is within the 61 additional ac-ft per year available for new <br />hookups including only existing use. If provision is made for reserving water supply for existing platted <br />lots and the land within the LAMIRDs, the district is still likely to have sufficient water rights. One <br />consequence of the alternatives is the use of much of the existing capacity of the water system. If more <br />water is used by the Marian Meadows development, less is available for other users.