My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
03. March
>
2018-03-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
PD-17-00001 Marian Meadows Full Record with Index (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 2:21:02 PM
Creation date
4/10/2018 12:02:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/6/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for Marian Meadows Planned Unit Development (PD-17-00001) Conditional Use Permit (CU-17-00001) and Plat (LP-17-0001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
42915
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1800
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marian Meadows Rezone and Subdivision Final Environmental Impact Statement 1-20 <br />Cumulative Impacts <br />Under existing county LOS standards, it is unlikely that adequate provision for parks and recreational <br />facilities would take place in conjunction with new development. The lack of provision for recreation <br />likely would result in either greater use of off-site facilities, which are either not in existence, or well <br />below the capacity to serve such a population, or would result in a lack of opportunities for recreational <br />activities to serve residents. <br />Public Services - Schools <br />Impacts on Instruction <br />Education financing is established by the state legislature through annual appropriation and includes <br />funding for what the state defines as “basic education.” The local community currently pays about 30 <br />percent of the cost of education not paid by the state. <br />In the future, if current funding formulas continue, the local community would be expected to provide <br />between 20 and 30 percent of the cost of instruction and transportation. <br />Impacts on Facilities <br />The projected student populations are affected substantially by the percent of retired and seasonal <br />residents. The number of students range from about 260 with Alternative 1 with largely full-time <br />residents to about 90 with Alternatives 3 and 5 with the same tenure scenario. This scenario would result <br />in a need to increase the size of facilities by a factor of up to about two-and-a-half for the existing school. <br />At the lower end of the tenure range with up to 50 percent of residents seasonal, Alternative 1 would add <br />an additional 80 students and Alternatives 3 and 5 would add about 30. This student population likely <br />could be accommodated for the first few years by capacity in existing classrooms. After a period of <br />several years, at least two and possibly three new classrooms would need to be added to the existing <br />school. <br />Transportation costs are related to facility decisions. For Alternative 1, the student population could vary <br />from about 260 students with all full-time residents to about 80 students with half the units occupied by <br />seasonal recreational residents. The number of school buses required to transport that many students <br />would range from about six to about two. <br />Cumulative Impacts <br />If development reflecting PUD density were applied to the area as a whole, additional student enrollment <br />would vary from around 850 at the high end to around 153 at the low end. At the upper end of the range, <br />this would be equivalent to current student enrollment of the Cle Elum School District. With buildout of <br />the project vicinity at rural density with 3-acre lots, the district would have about three-quarters the <br />number of students as the Cle Elum School District.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.