Laserfiche WebLink
I1. Applicable agencies, adjacent property owners and interested parties were given the <br />Opportunity to review the proposal. The following agencies and individuals provided <br />comments: <br />11.1 Washington De artment of Fish and Wildlife WD <br />11.1.1 In a comment letter dated July 20', 2017, WDFW makes reference to its <br />comments on Draft EIS related to the original proposal in a letter dated April <br />2°a, 2010, and provides additional comment on the revised proposal. In the <br />original comment letter, WDFW identified several concerns. These included: <br />11.1.1.1 The number of lots was excessive considering the terrain. <br />11.1.1.2 Elimination of mountain goat habitat. <br />11.1.1.3 Habitat connectivity. <br />11.1.1.4 Impacts to Silver Creek, a fish bearing stream. <br />11.1.1.5 Habitat impacts on the steep slopes to the east of the development. <br />11.1.1.6 Alluvial fans and debris flow hazards. <br />11.1.1.7 Firefighting issues. <br />The comment Ietter identified Alternative 5 of the DEIS as the least harmful <br />alternative. <br />In its comment letter on the revised proposal, WDFW provides additional concerns. <br />These include: <br />11.1.1.8 Wildlife connectivity and use; <br />11.1.19 Alterations to streams; <br />11.1.1.10 Increased fire risk; <br />11.1.1.11 General habitat impacts related to development; <br />11.1.2 WDFW Recommendations <br />In the two comment Ietters, the following mitigation measures are <br />recommended: <br />11.1.2.1 Adoption of the least harmful alternative, Alternative 5 in the <br />DEIS. <br />11.1.2.2 Exclusion of proposed parcels on the steeper, eastern portion of <br />the site. <br />PD -17-00001, CU -17-00001,1.,P-17-00001 <br />Marian Meadows Project <br />Page 3 of 27 <br />