My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DA-15-00001 Palomino Fields Master File
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
05. May
>
2016-05-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DA-15-00001 Palomino Fields Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 9:15:14 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:52:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/17/2016
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Public Hearing to Consider a Proposed Development Agreement to Allow Preliminary Plat, Palomino Fields, to Receive Final Plat Review in Five Separate Phases.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
29616
Type
Hold Public Hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
245
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TnE REMAINING OUESTIONS ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR REZONE APPLICANTS AND FOR AMENDMENTS TO <br />COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CODE. UNLESS THESE APPLY TO YOU THIS IS THE END OF THE SEPA <br />CHECKLIST. <br />SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS ONLY WHEN ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS, BE <br />AWARE THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSAL, OR THE TYPE OF ACTIVITIES LIKELY TO RESULT FROM THE PROPOSAL, WOULD <br />AFFECT AN ITEM AT A GREATER INTENSITY OR AT A FASTER RATE THAN IF THE PROPOSAL WERE NOT IMPLEMENTED. RESPOND <br />BRIEFLY AND IN GENERAL TERMS (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY) <br />1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions <br />to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production <br />of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases. <br />2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine <br />life: Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish or marine <br />life. <br />3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? <br />Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources. <br />4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally <br />sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental <br />protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or <br />endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or <br />prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or <br />reduce impacts. <br />5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including <br />whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses? Proposed <br />measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impact. <br />6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or <br />public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such <br />demand(s). <br />7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or <br />federal laws or requiementsf or the protection of the environment. <br />FOR STAFF USE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.