My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 94 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 94 of 339 <br />i. The view corridor shall be limited to twenty-five (25) feet in width or <br />twenty-five percent (25%) of the width of the lot frontage, whichever <br />distance is less; <br />ii. The removal of vegetation shall not require any ground-disturbing <br />equipment and shall not materially alter soils or topography; <br />iii. A view clearance plan may be requested by the Administrator when <br />determined that a substantial amount of vegetation is proposed for <br />modification. The plan shall be prepared by a qualified ecologist, forester, <br />arborist, or landscape architect prior to approving the view corridor and will <br />include: <br />(a) Identification and description of the location and extent of the proposed <br />tree removal, pruning, and limbing, and the view corridor; and <br />(b) A critical areas report prepared by a qualified ecologist demonstrating <br />the proposed removal of vegetation will not result in a net loss of <br />shoreline ecological function. <br />iv. Proposed view clearance within a designated landslide or erosion hazard <br />area shall require review of the proposed clearance by an engineering <br />geologist or geotechnical engineer to ensure that the proposed removal of <br />vegetation will not cause or exacerbate hazards. <br /> <br />b. Selective pruning. Selective pruning of trees for views is allowed. Selective <br />pruning of trees does not include removal of understory vegetation, and must not <br />compromise the health of the tree. A letter of exemption pursuant to Section <br />7.3.3 is not required for selective pruning, provided the development is exempt <br />pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(a), as amended. <br />c. Private pathways: Private pathways which provide pedestrian access to the <br />shoreline may be allowed within a shoreline buffer provided they are constructed <br />of pervious material, are less than or equal to six (6) feet wide, and follow a route <br />that minimizes erosion and gullying (e.g., a winding but direct path). Pathways <br />shall be co-located within the view corridor if one is available in order to minimize <br />buffer disturbance. A letter of exemption pursuant to Section 7.3.3 is not required <br />for private pathways, provided the development is exempt pursuant to WAC 173- <br />27-040(2)(a), as amended. <br />d. Hazard tree removal: Removal of a hazard tree, including removal for compliance <br />with KCC 20.10, Wildland Urban Interface Code, may be allowed in the shoreline <br />buffer when trimming is not sufficient to address the hazard. Where the hazard is <br />not immediately apparent to the Administrator, the Administrator may require the <br />applicant to submit a hazard tree determination report prepared by a qualified <br />arborist or forester. <br />e. Invasive species management: Removing invasive, non-native shoreline <br />vegetation listed on the Kittitas County Noxious Weed List or Washington State <br />Noxious Weed Board Monitor List should be allowed in the shoreline buffer when <br />otherwise consistent with this Program. The disturbed areas must be promptly re-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.