My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 90 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 90 of 339 <br />industrial uses and developments, multi-family residential development of more than <br />four (4) dwelling units, and all residential subdivisions of greater than four (4) parcels <br />unless the project proponent demonstrates that any of the following conditions exist: <br />a. Unavoidable public health or safety hazards exist and cannot be prevented <br />through reasonable means; or <br />b. The use and/or development has inherent security or cultural sensitivity <br />requirements that cannot be mitigated through reasonable design measures or <br />other solutions; or <br />c. The provision of public access for the proposed use or development is not <br />consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations on regulation <br />of private property and the principles of nexus and proportionality; or <br />d. The cost of providing the access, easement or an alternative amenity is <br />disproportionate to the total long-term cost of the proposed use or development; <br />or <br />e. The public access will cause unacceptable environmental impacts that cannot be <br />mitigated; or <br />f. The access would create significant, undue, and unavoidable conflicts with <br />adjacent uses that cannot be mitigated. <br /> <br />10. To be relieved from public access requirements the project proponent must <br />demonstrate that all feasible alternatives have been considered, including, but not <br />limited to: <br />a. Regulating access through means such as maintaining a gate and/or limiting <br />hours of use; and <br />b. Separating uses and activities (e.g., fences, terracing, use of one-way glazing, <br />hedges, landscaping, etc.). <br /> <br />11. When physical public access is deemed to be infeasible, the proponent shall provide <br />visual access to the shoreline or provide physical access at an off-site location <br />geographically separated from the proposed use or development (e.g., a street end, <br />vista, or trail system), or for a residential development, provide community access to <br />the shoreline or to a common waterfront lot/tract for non-commercial recreational use <br />of the property owners and guests within the proposed subdivision. <br /> <br />12. Public access shall be located and designed to be compatible with the natural <br />shoreline character, to avoid adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions and <br />processes, and to ensure public safety. <br /> <br />13. Public shoreline access provided by public road ends, public road rights-of-way, <br />public utilities and rights-of-way shall not be diminished by the County, neighboring <br />property owners, or other citizens, unless the property is zoned for industrial uses in <br />accordance with RCW Chapter 36.87.130. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.