Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 71 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 71 of 339 <br />except through a shoreline variance. Buffers that have been averaged or reduced by <br />any prior actions administered by Kittitas County shall not be further reduced. <br />Proposals for buffer reduction on such sites shall not require a shoreline variance if <br />the following conditions are met: <br />a. The existing buffer is predominantly unvegetated, composed of nuisance species <br />or in an otherwise highly disturbed condition; <br />b. The minimum width of the reduced buffer is at least seventy-five percent (75%) of <br />the standard width per Table 5.2-3; <br />c. The reduced portion of the buffer cannot exceed forty percent (40%) of the buffer <br />length on the development property; <br />d. A critical area report demonstrates that the reduction will not result in a net loss <br />of shoreline and aquatic habitat functions and values; <br />e. The reduced buffer area is planted and enhanced with species native to central <br />Washington; and <br />f. A mitigation plan is development and implemented, per the requirements of <br />Section 5.2. <br /> <br />9. Prior to approving a request for buffer averaging or reduction, the Administrator shall <br />ensure the development is designed to separate and screen the stream from <br />impacts such as noise, glare, and vegetation trampling. The site design shall <br />consider the varying degrees of impacts of different land uses. For example, parking <br />lots, store entrances, and roads generally have higher noise and glare impacts than <br />the rear of the store. Site screening should take advantage of natural topography or <br />existing vegetation, wherever possible. Where natural screening is not available, <br />berms, landscaping, and structural screens should be implemented (e.g., orient <br />buildings to screen parking lots and store entrances from critical areas). <br /> <br />L. Regulations—aquatic habitat conservation area reporting <br />1. Except for single-family residences located outside of shoreline buffers, if a <br />proposed use or development is located within two hundred (200) feet of a <br />designated aquatic habitat conservation area, a critical areas report is required, and <br />shall include the following: <br />a. The aquatic habitat conservation area habitat type and location of the OHWM; <br />b. All aquatic habitat conservation areas and required buffers within two hundred <br />(200) feet of the project area shall be depicted on the site plan; <br />c. The vegetative, faunal, topographic, and hydrologic characteristics of the aquatic <br />habitat conservation area; and <br />d. A detailed discussion of the direct and indirect potential impacts on aquatic <br />habitat conservation area by the project. Such discussion shall include a <br />discussion of the ongoing management practices that will protect habitat after the <br />project site has been developed. <br />