My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 69 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 69 of 339 <br />buffers shall be measured in all directions from the OHWM as identified in the field. <br />The buffer widths for Type S Waters are shown in Table 5.5-1 in Section 5.5 <br />Shoreline buffers and vegetation conservation. Buffers shall not be altered except as <br />authorized by this Program. These standard buffer widths are presumed to be <br />adequate to protect aquatic habitat conservation area functions and values provided <br />that the buffer contains relatively intact native vegetation at the time of the proposed <br />use or development. Where the use is being intensified adjacent to a degraded <br />buffer area that is not well vegetated, the Administrator may require the degraded <br />area to be revegetated to maintain aquatic habitat conservation area functions and <br />values. <br />Table 5.2-3. Aquatic Habitat Conservation Area Buffers <br />for Type F, Np, and Ns Waters <br />Aquatic Habitat <br />Conservation Area Standard Buffer Width <br />Type F Waters 100 feet <br />Type Np Waters 50 feet <br />Type Ns Waters 30 feet <br /> <br />2. Buffer condition: Aquatic habitat conservation area buffers shall be maintained in a <br />predominantly well-vegetated and undisturbed condition. Alterations that are not <br />associated with an allowed use or development shall be prohibited. <br /> <br />3. Multiple buffers: In the event that buffers for any aquatic habitat conservation areas <br />or other critical areas are contiguous or overlapping, the landward-most edge of all <br />such buffers shall apply. <br /> <br />4. Interrupted buffers: When an aquatic habitat conservation area buffer contains an <br />existing legally established public or private road the Administrator may allow a use <br />and/or development on the landward side of the road provided that the use and/or <br />development will not have a detrimental impact to the habitat area. The applicant <br />may be required to provide a critical areas report to describe the impacts. In <br />determining whether a critical areas report is necessary, the County shall consider <br />the hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection potential and the extent <br />and permanence of the buffer interruption. <br /> <br />5. Increased buffers: The Administrator shall increase the aquatic habitat conservation <br />area buffer shown in Table 5.2-3 width up to a maximum of two times the standard <br />width where the standard buffer is inadequate to prevent significant adverse <br />environmental impacts or address hazards associated with the site or the proposed <br />development activity. To assess whether a buffer increase is needed to project
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.