My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 65 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 65 of 339 <br />1. Reporting requirement: If a proposed use or development is located within three <br />hundred (300) feet of a known or suspected wetland, a wetland critical areas report <br />is required, and shall include the following: <br />a. The category and precise location of the boundary of the wetland(s); and <br />b. All wetlands and required buffers within three hundred (300) feet of the project <br />area shall be depicted on the site plan. Best available information should <br />include, but not be limited to, aerial photos, soils maps, and/or topographic maps; <br />and <br />c. An analysis of the onsite wetland(s) including the following site- and proposal- <br />related information: <br />i. Documentation of any fieldwork performed on the site, including, but not <br />limited to, field delineation data sheets for delineations, the wetland rating <br />forms, and baseline hydrologic data; <br />ii. A description of the methodologies used to conduct the wetland <br />delineations; and <br />iii. The vegetative, faunal, and hydrologic characteristics of the wetland. <br /> <br />I. Regulations—wetland compensatory mitigation <br /> <br />1. Wetland Mitigation Sequencing: Proposed activities or uses that would impact <br />wetlands must follow the mitigation sequencing requirement of 5.2.B.2. Wetland <br />impacts may be allowed when there is no reasonable alternative site design that <br />would result in less adverse impact to a wetland or its buffer. Activities and uses <br />within Category I wetlands shall be limited to the following: <br />a. An existing public facility that must be expanded or extended into the wetland; <br />b. Utility construction or maintenance, where there is no other site that can serve <br />the utility’s function; or <br />c. Development associated with an approved variance that allows the impact. <br />2. Compensatory mitigation requirement: Compensatory mitigation is required for all <br />alterations to wetlands or their buffers, except for buffer averaging when done in <br />accordance with this Section. <br /> <br />3. Preference of mitigation actions: Mitigation actions that require compensation by <br />replacing, enhancing, or substitution shall occur in the following order of preference: <br />a. Restoring and/or rehabilitating filled or altered wetlands to their original or near- <br />original condition. <br />b. Creating wetlands on disturbed upland sites such as those with vegetative cover <br />consisting primarily of non-native introduced species. This should only be <br />attempted when there is a consistent source of hydrology and it can be shown <br />that the surface and subsurface hydrologic regime is conducive to the wetland <br />community that is being designed. <br />c. Enhancing significantly degraded wetlands in combination with restoration or <br />creation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.