My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 4 42 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 42 of 339 <br />and developed settings, while allowing a variety of compatible uses. <br />B. Management policies <br />Shoreline use and development within this designation must be consistent with the <br />following policies: <br />1. Allow primarily uses that preserve the natural character of the area or promote <br />preservation of open space, floodplain or sensitive lands either directly or over the <br />long-term. Allow uses that result in restoration of ecological functions if the use is <br />otherwise compatible with the purpose of the environment and the setting. <br />2. Establish standards for shoreline stabilization measures, vegetation conservation, <br />water quality, and shoreline modifications to ensure that new uses and/or <br />development does not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or further <br />degrade other shoreline values. <br />3. Public access and public recreation objectives should be preferred uses and <br />implemented whenever feasible if significant ecological impacts can be mitigated. <br />4. Encourage uses to include restoration of ecological functions in the design of project <br />components. <br />5. Prioritize water-oriented uses over non-water-oriented uses. For shoreline areas <br />adjacent to commercially navigable waters, water-dependent uses should be given <br />highest priority. <br />6. Recognize mining is a unique use that may be an appropriate use within the urban <br />conservancy environment when conducted in a manner consistent with the <br />environment policies and the provisions of WAC 173-26-241(3)(h) and located <br />consistent with mineral resource lands designation criteria. <br />C. Designation criteria <br />1. Assign an urban conservancy environment designation to shoreline areas appropriate <br />and planned for development that is compatible with maintaining or restoring the <br />ecological functions of the area, that are not generally suitable for water-dependent <br />uses and that lie in incorporated municipalities, urban growth areas, or commercial <br />or industrial "limited areas of more intense development" if any of the following <br />characteristics apply: <br />a. They are suitable for water-related or water-enjoyment uses; <br />b. They are open space, floodplain or other sensitive areas that should not be more <br />intensively developed; <br />c. They have potential for ecological restoration; <br />d. They retain important ecological functions, even though partially developed; or <br />e. They have the potential for development that is compatible with ecological
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.