My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 301 of 339 <br /> <br />immediate as the three (3) years, the report may still be used to justify more immediate <br />authorization to protect against erosion using soft measures. <br />16. When structural shoreline stabilization measures are demonstrated to be necessary, the <br />following provisions shall apply: <br />a. The size of stabilization measures shall be limited to the minimum necessary. Use <br />measures designed to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions; <br />b. Soft approaches shall be used unless demonstrated not to be sufficient to protect <br />primary structures, dwellings, and businesses; and <br />c. Publicly financed or subsidized shoreline erosion control measures should not restrict <br />appropriate public access to the shoreline except where such access is not feasible <br />because of incompatible uses, safety, security, or harm to ecological functions. See KCC <br />17B.05.040 Public access. Where feasible, incorporate ecological restoration and public <br />access improvements into the project. <br />17. Breakwaters, jetties, groins, and weirs shall: <br />a. Be located waterward of the OHWM and shall be allowed only where necessary to <br />support water-dependent uses, public access, shoreline stabilization, or other specific <br />public purposes; and <br />b. Require a conditional use permit; except for those structures installed to protect or <br />restore ecological functions. <br />18. Shoreline stabilization projects shall be designed to protect critical areas and shall avoid and <br />reduce significant ecological impacts by providing for mitigation according to the sequence <br />in KCC 17B.05.020(B)(2). <br />19. Public access shall be required as part of publically-financed shoreline erosion control <br />measures. <br />20. Shoreline stabilization projects shall be designed and constructed to avoid or minimize <br />impacts to sediment transport. <br /> <br />17B.06.160 Shoreline restoration and habitat enhancement. <br />A. Policies. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.480, the shoreline restoration and habitat enhancement <br />policies of the 2016 Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program shall be considered as policies of <br />the Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan. <br />B. Regulations. <br />In addition to the regulations below, shoreline restoration and habitat enhancement is regulated <br />though KCC 17B.05.020 Environmental protection and critical areas, KCC 17B.05.050 <br />Shoreline buffers and vegetation conservation, and KCC 17B.05.060 Water quality, stormwater, <br />and nonpoint pollution. <br />1. Restoration shall be carried out in accordance with a County or resource agency-approved <br />restoration plan and in accordance with the policies and regulations of this Program. <br />2. All shoreline restoration and enhancement projects shall protect the integrity of adjacent <br />natural resources, including aquatic habitats and water quality, and shall not result in <br />significant adverse changes to ecological functions, processes or properties. <br />3. Restoration projects shall be monitored and maintained to ensure they achieve their <br />intended restoration goals. The project proponent shall assess and document each <br />restoration project according to the requirements prescribed by the applicable authorizing or <br />funding agency. The project proponent shall be responsible for implementing corrective <br />actions as needed to ensure the project’s ecological benefits are sustainable over time. <br />4. The Administrator shall track and document shoreline restoration efforts and their expected <br />and actual contribution to shoreline ecological functions on a regular and ongoing basis as <br />part of demonstrating whether no net loss is being achieved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.