My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 276 of 339 <br /> <br />7. Hazard present (channel migration zone): If County maps indicate that a potential channel <br />migration zone hazard exists on or adjacent to a proposed use or development site, the <br />applicant shall either: <br />a. Locate the proposal landward of the channel migration hazard area as indicated on the <br />map; or <br />b. Submit a channel migration zone study, prepared by a geologist, engineering geologist, <br />or professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington with at least five (5) years of <br />experience in analyzing channel response in the fluvial systems of the Pacific Northwest, <br />that demonstrates the following: <br />i. The parcel on which the development or use is proposed is effectively protected <br />(disconnected) from channel movement due to the existence of permanent levees <br />maintained by public agencies or infrastructure such as roads and bridges <br />constructed and maintained by public agencies (not all roads and levees will be <br />considered disconnection points); or <br />ii. The proposed use or development site has minimal risk of channel migration <br />during the next one hundred (100) years as indicated by the existing channel type, <br />land cover (and low likelihood of future alterations in land cover); surficial geology, <br />low soil erosion potential; lack of evidence of likely avulsion pathways (including <br />areas upstream of, but proximate to, the site); low inundation frequency(ies). The <br />assessment shall include a review of available data regarding historical channel <br />locations at the site; identification of the site within a broader geomorphic reach of <br />the river system, and the general characteristics of that reach; description of <br />existing channel type, existing channel alterations and likelihood of future <br />alterations with changes in land cover; surficial geology, soils and erosion potential; <br />and geotechnical setbacks relating to erosion at the toe of adjacent slope(s). The <br />approach to assessing local migration shall be generally equivalent to the methods <br />detailed in “A Framework for Delineating Channel Migration Zones” (Ecology <br />Publication # 03-06-027), or similar method approved or sanctioned by Ecology. <br />8. Based upon the results of the channel migration zone assessment, the Administrator may <br />prohibit or limit use or development within a channel migration zone and/or require a buffer <br />of undisturbed natural vegetation from the edge of the channel migration zone. <br />9. The Administrator may impose conditions on any new shoreline use and developments in a <br />geologically hazardous area as needed to: <br />a. Protect slope stability and minimize erosion, seismic, and/or landslide hazard risks; <br />b. Maintain natural sediment and erosion processes that are integral to the health and <br />sustainability of freshwater ecosystems; <br />c. Minimize the potential for property damage related to seismic events, erosion and/or <br />landslides; <br />d. Minimize the need for structural shoreline stabilization in the future; <br />e. Protect human health and safety; and <br />f. Reduce public liabilities for damages associated with seismic events, erosion and/or <br />landslides. <br /> <br />17B.05.020Q Frequently flooded areas – designation and mapping. <br />1. Designation and mapping: All lands classified as floodway or special flood hazard areas in <br />the Federal Emergency Management Agency report titled “Flood Insurance Rate Maps and <br />Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps” dated November 5, 1980, as now or hereafter <br />amended are designated as frequently flooded areas. The report and maps are on file at <br />Kittitas County. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in the report, the <br />Administrator shall obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and <br />floodway data available from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.