My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 261 of 339 <br /> <br />of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Management Recommendations, dated <br />May 1991, or as thereafter amended, or equivalent federal recommendations, shall <br />serve as guidance for preparing mitigation plans to protect wildlife habitat conservation <br />areas. <br />c. Mitigation plans for geologically hazardous areas shall be prepared by a qualified <br />professional who is either a geologist or a geotechnical engineer, or a civil engineer <br />licensed in the state of Washington, who is knowledgeable of regional geologic <br />conditions and who has professional experience in landslide and erosion hazard <br />evaluation, mitigation plan design, implementation, and monitoring. <br />d. Mitigation plans for development within frequently flooded areas shall be prepared by a <br />civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington and familiar with hydrology, hydraulics, <br />and fluvial geomorphology. <br />4. Mitigation banking and in-lieu fee (ILF) mitigation: The County may approve mitigation <br />banking and/or in-lieu fee mitigation as a form of compensatory mitigation for wetland and <br />habitat conservation area impacts when the provisions of this Program require mitigation <br />and when the use of a bank/ILF Program will provide equivalent or greater replacement of <br />critical area functions and values when compared to conventional permittee responsible <br />mitigation. Banks and ILF programs shall only be used when it can be demonstrated that <br />they provide significant ecological benefits including long-term conservation of critical areas, <br />important species, habitats and/or habitat linkages, and when they are documented to <br />provide a viable alternative to the piecemeal mitigation for individual project impacts to <br />achieve ecosystem-based conservation goals. Banks and ILF programs shall not be used <br />unless they are certified in accordance with applicable federal and state mitigation rules and <br />expressly authorized through County legislative action. <br /> <br />17B.05.020E Mitigation – mitigation plan contents for all critical areas. <br />1. Baseline Information: Compensatory mitigation plans for all critical area types shall include a <br />written assessment and accompanying maps, and include the following information: <br />a. Impacted critical areas and/or their required buffers, including, at a minimum, existing <br />wetland/stream acreage; vegetative, fauna and hydrologic characteristics; soil and <br />substrate conditions; and topographic elevations. <br />b. Mitigation site, if different from the impacted site, including at a minimum: existing <br />acreage; vegetative, faunal and hydrologic conditions; relationship within watershed and <br />to existing water bodies; soil and substrate conditions topographic elevations; existing <br />and proposed adjacent site conditions; buffers; and ownership. <br />2. Environmental goals and objectives: The mitigation plan shall identify goals and objectives <br />and include: <br />a. The purposes of the compensation measures including a description of site selection <br />criteria, identification of compensation goals, identification of target evaluation species <br />and resource functions, dates for beginning and completion, and a complete description <br />of the structure and functional relationships sought. The goals and objectives shall be <br />related to the functions and values of the original critical area or, if out-of-kind, the type <br />of critical area to be emulated. <br />b. A review of the available literature and/or experience to date in restoring or creating the <br />type of critical area proposed. An analysis of the likelihood of success of the <br />compensation project at duplicating the original resource shall be provided based on the <br />experiences of comparable projects, if any. An analysis of the likelihood of persistence of <br />the created or restored resources shall be provided based on such factors as surface <br />and groundwater supply and flow patterns, dynamics of the ecosystem, sediment or <br />pollutant influx and/or erosion, periodic flooding and drought, presence of invasive flora
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.