Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 261 of 339 <br /> <br />of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Management Recommendations, dated <br />May 1991, or as thereafter amended, or equivalent federal recommendations, shall <br />serve as guidance for preparing mitigation plans to protect wildlife habitat conservation <br />areas. <br />c. Mitigation plans for geologically hazardous areas shall be prepared by a qualified <br />professional who is either a geologist or a geotechnical engineer, or a civil engineer <br />licensed in the state of Washington, who is knowledgeable of regional geologic <br />conditions and who has professional experience in landslide and erosion hazard <br />evaluation, mitigation plan design, implementation, and monitoring. <br />d. Mitigation plans for development within frequently flooded areas shall be prepared by a <br />civil engineer licensed in the state of Washington and familiar with hydrology, hydraulics, <br />and fluvial geomorphology. <br />4. Mitigation banking and in-lieu fee (ILF) mitigation: The County may approve mitigation <br />banking and/or in-lieu fee mitigation as a form of compensatory mitigation for wetland and <br />habitat conservation area impacts when the provisions of this Program require mitigation <br />and when the use of a bank/ILF Program will provide equivalent or greater replacement of <br />critical area functions and values when compared to conventional permittee responsible <br />mitigation. Banks and ILF programs shall only be used when it can be demonstrated that <br />they provide significant ecological benefits including long-term conservation of critical areas, <br />important species, habitats and/or habitat linkages, and when they are documented to <br />provide a viable alternative to the piecemeal mitigation for individual project impacts to <br />achieve ecosystem-based conservation goals. Banks and ILF programs shall not be used <br />unless they are certified in accordance with applicable federal and state mitigation rules and <br />expressly authorized through County legislative action. <br /> <br />17B.05.020E Mitigation – mitigation plan contents for all critical areas. <br />1. Baseline Information: Compensatory mitigation plans for all critical area types shall include a <br />written assessment and accompanying maps, and include the following information: <br />a. Impacted critical areas and/or their required buffers, including, at a minimum, existing <br />wetland/stream acreage; vegetative, fauna and hydrologic characteristics; soil and <br />substrate conditions; and topographic elevations. <br />b. Mitigation site, if different from the impacted site, including at a minimum: existing <br />acreage; vegetative, faunal and hydrologic conditions; relationship within watershed and <br />to existing water bodies; soil and substrate conditions topographic elevations; existing <br />and proposed adjacent site conditions; buffers; and ownership. <br />2. Environmental goals and objectives: The mitigation plan shall identify goals and objectives <br />and include: <br />a. The purposes of the compensation measures including a description of site selection <br />criteria, identification of compensation goals, identification of target evaluation species <br />and resource functions, dates for beginning and completion, and a complete description <br />of the structure and functional relationships sought. The goals and objectives shall be <br />related to the functions and values of the original critical area or, if out-of-kind, the type <br />of critical area to be emulated. <br />b. A review of the available literature and/or experience to date in restoring or creating the <br />type of critical area proposed. An analysis of the likelihood of success of the <br />compensation project at duplicating the original resource shall be provided based on the <br />experiences of comparable projects, if any. An analysis of the likelihood of persistence of <br />the created or restored resources shall be provided based on such factors as surface <br />and groundwater supply and flow patterns, dynamics of the ecosystem, sediment or <br />pollutant influx and/or erosion, periodic flooding and drought, presence of invasive flora