My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit D | March 2016 | Page 259 of 339 <br /> <br />location of known critical areas; there may be other critical areas that are not shown on the <br />maps and the critical areas that are shown may or may not fully meet the designation criteria <br />contained in the Program. The maps are intended to alert the development community, <br />county residents, as well as current and prospective landowners of the possibility of site <br />development constraints which may limit or alter development plans. Any presumption <br />created by the maps may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence. <br />3. Proponents of any new shoreline use or development shall provide information concerning <br />the presence, condition, and location of all critical areas and buffers potentially affected by <br />their proposal. The Administrator shall rely on information provided by the proponent as well <br />as other information including, but not limited to, aerial photographs, published reports or <br />studies, visual observations made by qualified professionals, and information provided by <br />resource agencies, tribes, academic institutions and other reliable sources to determine the <br />presence of critical areas and/or required buffers on or adjacent to the subject property. <br />4. Building setback: Except as provided in KCC 17B.06.200(B)(12), and where otherwise <br />provided, buildings and other structures shall be set back a distance of fifteen (15) feet from <br />the edges of all critical area buffers or from the edges of all critical areas, if no buffers are <br />required. The following are allowed in the building setback area: <br />a. Landscaping; <br />b. Uncovered decks; <br />c. Building overhangs, if such overhangs do not extend more than eighteen (18) inches <br />into the setback area; and <br />d. Impervious ground surfaces, such as driveways and patios. <br />5. Temporary or permanent field identification: Prior to use and/or development within or <br />adjacent to a critical area, the County should require temporary or permanent field markers <br />delineating the critical area boundary and associated buffer. The type of field markers to be <br />used will be agreed to by the project proponent and the Administrator depending on site <br />conditions and inspection requirements. Field markers shall be spaced at a minimum of <br />every fifty (50) feet, unless alternative placement or spacing is authorized by the <br />Administrator. The location of field stakes must be shown on all site plans and final plats <br />associated with the development proposal. Field markers shall remain in place until any <br />required final inspections are completed and approved. Field markers may be waived by the <br />Administrator if an alternative to field staking achieves the same objective, or if the <br />development and construction activity(ies) is located at a sufficient distance so that impacts <br />to the critical area are unlikely to occur. The Administrator may require permanent fencing <br />and/or signage if necessary to protect a critical area and its buffer from adjacent land uses. <br />6. Notice on title: Any property on which a development proposal is submitted shall have filed <br />with the Kittitas County Auditor: <br />a. A notice on title of the presence and location of the critical area and/or buffer; <br />b. A statement as to the applicability of this Program to the property; and <br />c. A statement describing possible limitations on action in or affecting critical areas or <br />buffer as approved by the Administrator. The County shall record such documents and <br />will provide a copy of the recorded notice to the property owner of record. Development <br />proposals which are defined as normal repair and maintenance of existing structures or <br />development, including, but not limited to, roof repair, interior remodeling, wood stove <br />permits, and on-site sewage disposal systems repairs, are exempt from this <br />requirement. <br />7. Request for technical assistance: The Administrator may engage technical consultants to <br />review and interpret critical areas data and findings submitted by or on behalf of the <br />proponent, in instances where County staff lack the resources or expertise to review these <br />materials. A project proponent may be required to pay for or reimburse the County for the <br />review costs incurred.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.