My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit C | March 2016 | Page 218 of 339 <br /> <br />3. The specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. <br />The appellant shall bear the burden of proving the decision was wrong; <br />4. The desired outcome or changes to the decision; <br />5. The appeals fee. <br />4. Notice of Hearing. <br />a. Not later than the 15 calendar days after the receipt of one or more timely Notices of <br />Appeal, the authorized official shall issue and serve a Notice of Hearing to the <br />appellants. Requests from multiple parties concerning the same nuisance may be <br />consolidated. <br />b. The Notice of Hearing shall be served by the same means as the Notice of Violation <br />and Abatement. <br />c. The Notice of Hearing shall contain the date, time, and location of the hearing. <br />5. Hearing. <br />a. The appeal of a Notice of Violation and Abatement shall be heard by the Hearing <br />Examiner. <br />b. Unless otherwise provided herein, the provisions of Chapter 2.11 KCC shall govern <br />the hearing process. <br />c. The burden of proof is on the county to establish the violation by a preponderance of <br />the evidence. The observation of a violation on different dates shall be prima facia <br />evidence that the violation continued to exist on intervening dates. <br />d. The Hearing Examiner shall determine if the property at issue constitutes a public <br />nuisance as defined in this Chapter. The Hearing Examiner shall also determine if <br />the appellant is the property owner and is therefore personally liable for the costs of <br />abating the nuisance. <br />6. Order of the Hearing Examiner. <br />a. Unless mutually agreed to by the appellant and the Hearing Examiner, the order of <br />the Hearing Examiner shall be served upon the person to whom it is directed, either <br />personally or by mailing a copy of the order to such person at his/her last known <br />address as determined by the designated authorized official. <br />b. The Hearing Examiner, in affirming the authorized official's Notice of Violation and <br />Abatement, shall impose the fine consistent with the penalty provision of this title and <br />may assess administrative costs and/or costs related to the abatement of the <br />nuisance. <br />c. The Hearing Examiner may order the County to pay the appellant the appeals fee, <br />costs, and/or attorney fees only upon a finding that both the violation did not occur <br />and intentional misconduct on the part of the authorized official. <br />d. The appellant may file a request for reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's <br />decision within seven working days of the date of the Hearing Examiner's written <br />decision, file with the Hearing Examiner a written request for reconsideration based <br />on any one of the following grounds materially affecting the substantial rights of said <br />party or person: <br />1. Errors of procedure or misinterpretation of fact, material to the party seeking <br />the request for reconsideration. <br />2. Irregularity in the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner by which such <br />party was prevented from having a fair hearing. <br />3. Clerical mistakes in the official file or record transmitted to the Examiner, <br />including errors arising from inadvertence, oversight, or omission, which may <br />have materially affected the Board's decision on the matter. <br />Upon receipt of a request for reconsideration, the Hearing Examiner shall <br />review said request in light of the record and take such further action as is <br />deemed proper; including, but not limited to, denying the request, granting <br />the request, with or without oral argument, and may render a revised
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.