My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 7 149 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 149 of 339 <br />7.6 Review criteria <br />1. All development permits. As provided in Section 6.20, no permit shall be issued for <br />any new or expanded building or structure of more than thirty-five (35) feet above <br />average grade level on shorelines of the state that will obstruct the view of a <br />substantial number of residences on areas adjoining such shorelines unless <br />overriding considerations of the public interest will be served. <br /> <br />2. Substantial development permits. A substantial development permit shall be granted <br />only when the applicant demonstrates all of the following: <br />a. That the proposal is consistent with the policies and procedures in RCW Chapter <br />90.58 and WAC Chapter 173-27; <br />b. That the proposal is consistent with the policies and procedures of the Master <br />Program; and <br />c. That the proposal has been appropriately conditioned where necessary to assure <br />consistency of the project with the Act and the local Master Program. <br /> <br />3. Conditional use permits. Uses which are classified are set forth in Table 4.9-1 as <br />conditional uses, or unclassified uses not specifically prohibited, may be authorized <br />as a conditional use provided that the applicant demonstrates all of the following: <br />a. That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and the <br />Master Program; <br />b. That the proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public <br />shorelines; <br />c. That the proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with <br />other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under <br />the comprehensive plan and SMP; <br />d. That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline <br />environment in which it is to be located; <br />e. That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect; <br />f. That if conditional use permits were granted for other developments in the area <br />where similar circumstances exist, the cumulative impact of such uses would <br />remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and not produce <br />substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment. <br />g. That the proposed use has been appropriately conditioned to prevent <br />undesirable effects of the proposed use and to assure consistency of the project <br />with the Act and the local Master Program. <br />h. When converting from one nonconforming use to a different nonconforming use, <br />the applicant must demonstrate that no reasonable alternative conforming use is <br />practical and that the proposed use will be at least as consistent with the policies <br />and provisions of the Act and the Master Program and as compatible with the <br />uses in the area as the pre-existing use. <br /> <br />4. Variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.