My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 6 123 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 123 of 339 <br />structure, as demonstrated by a geotechnical analysis. <br /> <br />4. New uses and developments that would require shoreline stabilization which causes <br />significant impacts to adjacent or down-current properties and shoreline areas shall <br />not be allowed. <br /> <br />5. New structural stabilization measures shall only be allowed for the following instances, <br />and then only when necessity is demonstrated based on criteria included in this <br />Section: <br />a. When necessary to protect an existing primary structure; <br />b. In support of new non-water-dependent development, including single-family <br />residence; <br />c. In support of new water-dependent development; and <br />d. To protect projects for the restoration of ecological functions or hazardous <br />substance remediation projects. <br />6. New or enlarged structural shoreline stabilization measures for an existing primary <br />structure, including residences, are permitted only if there is conclusive evidence, <br />documented by a geotechnical analysis, that the structure is in danger from shoreline <br />erosion caused by stream processes or waves. Normal sloughing, erosion of steep <br />bluffs, or shoreline erosion itself, without a scientific or geotechnical analysis, is not <br />demonstration of need. The geotechnical analysis shall evaluate on-site drainage <br />issues and address drainage problems away from the shoreline edge before <br />considering structural shoreline stabilization. <br />7. New structural stabilization for new non-water-dependent development, including <br />single-family residences, is permitted only if it can be demonstrated that: <br />a. The erosion is not being caused by upland conditions, such as the loss of <br />vegetation and drainage; <br />b. Nonstructural measures, such as placing the proposed use or development <br />further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage <br />improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient; and <br />c. The need to protect primary structures from damage due to erosion is <br />demonstrated through a geotechnical report that states damage was caused <br />by natural processes, such as stream processes or waves. <br />8. New structural stabilization for water-dependent development is permitted only if it can <br />be demonstrated that: <br />a. The erosion is not being caused by upland conditions, such as the loss of <br />vegetation and drainage; <br />b. Nonstructural measures, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage <br />improvements, are not feasible or not sufficient; and <br />c. The need to protect primary structures from damage due to erosion is <br />demonstrated through a geotechnical report.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.