My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 6 115 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 115 of 339 <br />5. Mining should be located and operated so as to provide long-term protection of <br />water quality, and fish and wildlife habitats. <br />6. Mining, particularly surface or strip mining, should provide for timely restoration of <br />disturbed areas to a biologically productive, attractive semi-natural, or other useful <br />condition through a reclamation process consistent with regulations administered by <br />the Washington State Department of Natural Resources and other applicable local <br />standards. <br />7. Mining of shorelines having high value for recreation, or as fish or wildlife habitat, <br />should generally not be permitted. <br />8. Mining should only be permitted where appropriate studies and detailed operation <br />plans demonstrate that: <br />a. Fish habitat, upland habitat and water quality will not be significantly harmed; <br />and <br />b. The operation will not adversely affect geologic or hydrologic processes, <br />channel alignment, nor increase bank erosion or flood damage. <br /> <br />9. Mining operations should be located, designed, and managed so that other <br />appropriate uses are not subjected to substantial or unnecessary adverse impacts <br />from noise, vibration, odor, dust or other effects of the operation. The operator may be <br />required to implement measures such as buffers, limited hours, or other mitigating <br />measures to minimize adverse impacts. <br />B. Regulations <br />1. Mining below the OHWM of a river shall be permitted only when: <br />a. Removal of specified quantities of sand and gravel or other materials at specific <br />locations will not adversely affect the natural processes of gravel transportation <br />for the river system as a whole; and <br />b. The mining and any associated permitted activities will not have significant <br />adverse impacts to habitat for priority species nor cause a net loss of ecological <br />functions of the shoreline. <br />c. Determination of whether the two provisions above have been met shall be made <br />consistent with RCW 90.58.100(1) and WAC 173-26-201(2)(a). Such evaluation <br />of impacts should be appropriately integrated with relevant environmental review <br />requirements of SEPA (RCW Chapter 43.21C) and the SEPA rules (WAC <br />Chapter 197-11). <br />d. In considering renewal, extensions or reauthorization of gravel bar and other in- <br />channel mining operations in locations where they have previously been <br />conducted, local government shall require compliance with this subsection (1) to <br />the extent that no such review has previously been conducted. Where there has <br />been prior review, local government shall review previous determinations
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.