My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 6 111 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 111 of 339 <br />2. Non-federal forest practices not meeting criteria (a), (b), or (c) above shall require a <br />conditional use permit. <br /> <br />3. Non-federal forest practices not meeting criteria (d) above (Class 1 forest practices <br />activities not requiring DNR approval) shall be reviewed as separate uses or <br />activities. <br /> <br />4. Non-federal forest practices not meeting criteria (e) above shall be reviewed as a <br />new proposed use. <br /> <br />5. Within the shoreline jurisdiction, development activities associated with timber <br />harvest (such as road construction), land conversion of forest land to non-forest <br />uses, and forest practices not meeting any of the exemptions listed above must <br />conform to all applicable provisions of this Program. <br /> <br />6.10 Industrial and port development <br />A. Policies <br />1. Allocate sufficient quantities of suitable land for water-related industry. Give <br />preference to water-dependent industrial uses over non-water-dependent industrial <br />uses; and give preference to water-related industrial uses over non-water-oriented <br />industrial uses. Allow non-water-oriented industrial development in limited situations. <br /> <br />2. Industrial development shall be located, designed, or constructed in a manner that <br />assures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions such that it does not have <br />significant adverse impacts to other shoreline resources and values. <br /> <br />3. Discourage industries which have proven to be environmentally hazardous from <br />locating along the shorelines. <br /> <br />4. Industrial development should consider incorporating public access as mitigation for <br />impacts to shoreline resources and values unless public access cannot be provided <br />in a manner that does not result in significant interference with operations or hazards <br />to life or property. <br /> <br />5. Where industrial use is proposed for location on land in public ownership, public <br />access should be required. <br /> <br />6. Industrial development and redevelopment should be encouraged to locate where <br />environmental cleanup and restoration of the shoreline area can be incorporated.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.