My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Conduct Closed Record Meeting for the Windbent Ranch Prellliminary Plat LP-08-00016
>
Meetings
>
2009
>
10. October
>
2009-10-20 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda Session
>
Conduct Closed Record Meeting for the Windbent Ranch Prellliminary Plat LP-08-00016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2018 1:34:06 PM
Creation date
4/6/2018 1:25:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/20/2009
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda Session
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
b
Item
Closed Record Meeting to Consider the Windbent Ranch Preliminary Plat LP-08-00016
Order
2
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
9208
Type
Conduct closed record meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Print Name: <br />THE REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR REZONE APPLICANTS AND FOR AMENDMENTS TO COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND <br />CODE. UNLESS THESE APPLY TO YOU THIS IS THE END OF THE SE1PA CHECKLIST. <br />SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS ONLY. WHEN ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS, BE AWARE THE <br />EXTENT OF THE PROPOSAL, OR THE TYPE OF ACTIVITIES LIKELY TO RESULT FROM THE PROPOSAL, WOULD AFFECT AN ITEM AT A GREATER <br />INTENSITY OR AT A FASTER RATE THAN IF THE PROPOSAL. WERE NOT IMPLEMENTED. RESPOND BRIEFLY AND IN GENERAL TERMS (ATTACH <br />ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY) <br />FOR STAFF USE <br />1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions <br />to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production <br />of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases. <br />How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine <br />life; Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish or marine life. <br />3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? <br />Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources. <br />How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive <br />areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; <br />such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species <br />habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplain, or prime farmlands? <br />Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts. <br />5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including <br />whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses? Proposed measures <br />to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impact. <br />How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or <br />public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such <br />demand(s). <br />10of11 <br />(D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.