My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSHP Covered Arena & Associated Build-Out-Cle Elum
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
06. June
>
2017-06-20 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
WSHP Covered Arena & Associated Build-Out-Cle Elum
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2018 3:26:32 PM
Creation date
1/16/2018 12:02:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
6/20/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Lodging Tax Large Scale Projects Presentations and Request to Consider the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's Recommendation on the Tourism-Related, Large-Scale Municipality-Owned Capital Projects and Operations Grant Applications
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
37453
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
profitability of these facilities is inversely proportional to size.In our conversations with <br />public sector horse facility managers,the generally agreed upon estimate of profitability <br />is that costs exceed revenues in all but 8-10%of facilities.This is despite the fact that <br />many of these facilities are not required to make capital payments,as the capital is held <br />by the public entity.How are these losses justified?The construction of multi-million <br />dollar horse parks and their continued operation is commonlyjustified on grounds of <br />their generating economic impacts and unquantifiable benefits which extend beyond the <br />accounting balances between revenuesand costs.These total impacts are of two <br />types:direct impacts that reflect expenditures generated by horse park activities;and <br />indirect impacts,which reflect the regenerative impacts of the initial spending.For this <br />reason this feasibility study will be coupled with an impact analysis that will factor in the <br />total effect of direct plus indirect impacts. <br />This repod is an evaluationof feasibility and potential impact of a proposed state horse <br />park that was authorized by the Washington State Legislature in 1997.The horse park <br />is intended to be a first-class equestrianfacility serving a broad range of the <br />recreational,competitiveand educationalneeds of Washington State horse owners.It <br />will support community,youth and disabled riding programs and will foster physical <br />fitness,responsibility,and achievement.Although the general concept for the <br />proposed horse park is for a facility that is custom designed for equine events,it will <br />also be attractive for some secondary types of uses such as company picnics,dog <br />shows,motor vehicle shows,and trail bicycle events.To modify the design to <br />accommodateother non-equestrianevents will require additional capital. <br />This report is comprised of six sections.The remainder of this first section details the <br />purpose of the study,states study parameters,summarizesthe history of the <br />Washington State Horse Park,and provides a summary of the master plan.Section Il <br />reviews previousstudies of horse park feasibility and impact.Section III examines <br />existing facilities that were surveyed in the study.Section IV presents the methodology, <br />10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.