My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Kittitas Valley Event Center Barns & Bloom Pavilion Project-Kitt Co
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
06. June
>
2017-06-20 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Kittitas Valley Event Center Barns & Bloom Pavilion Project-Kitt Co
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2018 2:58:27 PM
Creation date
1/16/2018 12:01:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
6/20/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Lodging Tax Large Scale Projects Presentations and Request to Consider the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's Recommendation on the Tourism-Related, Large-Scale Municipality-Owned Capital Projects and Operations Grant Applications
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
37453
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
e =likely applicable for at least some portion of Event Center that could be spun-off if shown to reduce operating deficits, <br />expense especially for facilities suitable for steady year-round use. <br />O =not as likely to be applicable for Event Center use though not <br />out of the question Donations -could play a potentially significant role if an aggressive <br />+=not likely applicable either for legal or financial reasons capital campaign could be organized around major donors as <br />champions of a state-of-the-art Event Center facility.Considerable <br />Funding sources are not necessarily mutually exclusive.For lead-time is typically required to assess feasibility and mount a <br />example,lodging (hotel/motel)tax revenues may be used to pay for successful campaign. <br />capital improvements either on a cash pay-as-you-go basis or with <br />annual payments pledged to debt financing.The following Federal and state grants -can also be expected to play a role in the <br />comments are for consideration of potential funding suitability of overall funding program,especially for smaller,stand-alone <br />each funding source:components of the overall improvement program as in the <br />$250,000 -$2,000,000 range.A pivotal question is whether to make <br />Lodging tax revenues -likely play a potentially pivotal role grants a major part of the overall funding program or whether to <br />because of their current use in supporting Event Center operations take a more opportunistic approach for initial grants to prime the <br />plus alternative uses for other tourism promotion activities region-pump for more significant later phase funding. <br />wide.However,lodging tax will represent,at best,just one part of <br />the total funding equation.For example,even if 100%of all existing Public Facilities Districts (PFDs)-are proving to be the most <br />city and county lodging tax were dedicated to debt repayment,less versatile tool for funding and management of major event centers <br />than $24,000,000 in debt financing would be supported -assuming in Washington state.Most PFDs to date have taken advantage of a <br />a 30 year repayment period and 3.50%annual interest rate.now-expired sales tax credit,with little track record to date of <br />seeking or obtaining voter approval for property and/or sales tax <br />General fund revenues -are not expected to contribute mechanisms potentially available by state statute. <br />substantially to capital improvements,except perhaps for smaller <br />improvements -especially as long as continuing general fund Revitalization financing -tools of a wide variety have been tried in <br />subsidy support in the range of $200,000 is required to offset the Washington state,though with limited success to date.Applicability <br />annual event center /fairgrounds operating deficit.to a fairground is questionable as most of the funding mechanisms <br />rely on some form of increased tax revenue (a factor of obvious <br />User fees -typically are viewed as a source to first defray operating limited applicability to publicly owned and/or operated facilities). <br />expenses.New facilities may actually increase the operating deficit <br />(at least temporarily)until added revenues capability is proven with Voted general obligation bonding -represents a source that <br />increased marketability,attendance,and or rates with new and conceivably could play a major role -with capacity conceivably to <br />improved facilities.Achieving operating self-sufficiency should not underwrite up to 100%of project costs.Recommended is that a <br />be expected given the experience of most other comparable preliminary survey be conducted to assess voter interest in this <br />facilities.option -and at what level of potential funding support. <br />Private funding -as a for-profit venture does not appear to be a Non-voted GO or revenue bonding -is also possible but cannot be <br />feasible option for full Event Center operations,based on the expected to carry the full cost of redevelopment -unless <br />experience of existing fairgrounds and related event venues in the improvements are phased over a substantial time period (likely <br />Pacific Northwest.There may be portions of fairground operations beyond 15 years).Revenue bonding is possible with pledging of <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.