My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ResolutiontoapproveContractforCivilStructuralConstEngServices
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
02. February
>
2017-02-07 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
ResolutiontoapproveContractforCivilStructuralConstEngServices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2018 3:11:54 PM
Creation date
1/16/2018 11:19:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/7/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
z
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Director's Signature on the Consultant Agreements for Professional Civil, Structural and Construction Engineering Services Contracts
Order
26
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
34676
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Attachment A- FYI NA1 ON Audit Report <br />North American Infrastructure <br />A liasiness tlnil of.lacabs Engineering Croup Lu. <br />Notes to Statements of Fringe Benefit ENpeuse <br />and General & Administrative Expense <br />for the FismiI Year Ended October 2, 2015 <br />BEIM.-; Ul'Accounting and Deser'lption of Accounting Systems (continued) <br />Effective Scptember 28. 2013, the beginning of V 201-1. Jacobs exceeded the Cost Accnunlim Standard <br />ICASi 403 threslTold for requiring the use of the three -factor formula for allocating its Corporate Residual <br />Expense Pool (reference CAS 9904.103-40(c)(2)). As a result. alae accompanying Slatemenl ol'General IL <br />Administrative Expenses includes Jacobs Residual Pool allocated using the three -factor lbrnnlla (i.e.. <br />average of IrMILICS, payroll S's and net fixed assets.) <br />3. Allocation Methods <br />The Company has established two indirect rates: (l ) an At -Office Rale that is applied to work performed hi, <br />Jncobs-provided facilities, and (2) an At -Site Rale 11tnt is applied to work- performed at non -Jacobs (i.e.. <br />customer) provided ['acilides. The allocation base for the At -Site GSA rate includes all Prol'essional <br />Services and all Field Staff Direct Labor including prelniums. The allacalion base for the At -Office G. -A <br />rate includes At -Office Professional Services and At -Office Field Slaft Direcl Labor including premiums. <br />Coniracl labor is not included In the direct labor base, and it is char -ed direct to projects as an ODC. <br />The Company uses Ilse same fringe benefit rate for both its At -Office and AI-Sllc direct labor and allocates <br />fringe benefit expenses bused upon total payroll dollars (including premiums aril excluding incentive <br />compensntion.) <br />The Company receives an allocation of costs from the Parent Company chat includes salaries. related frilT_"c <br />benefits and general and administrative expenses. The GSA expenses include the costs of certain executive <br />nTI11r1gelTTent, accounlin��. treasury. infarrnslion technology. humin resources, health and safety. and <br />other corpornle functions. Time costs are allnemcd to the Company based opals a three-tier method, Mlieh <br />allocates costs that are: (1) directly attributable to the Company: (2) separately associated with the Company <br />Ihat arc allocated based upon appropriate bases titan use direct labor dollars. total payroll dollars, revenues. or <br />a combination thereof: und. (3) amounts remaining after the first Iwo tiers. allocated based upon a two -factor <br />formula that is compuled using Professional Service and Field StalTpayroll dollars and revenues. <br />The allocanions of f is Parent Company's Corporate Home Office casts have been properly adjusted to relied <br />FAR Part 31 disallowances. These amounts werc determined by Elie same multi -step process as described <br />above in Note'_. 77Te net allowable costs for each of ase Corporate Home Office Cos[ pools are Ellen allocated <br />using file melhudulugics described above. <br />Excess Cumpensalion <br />The unallmrable indirect labor adjustment ol'S416.585 includes a disallowance pl'S402.170 based till <br />application ofthe $447,000 benchnim-h- and an additional 311.355 was disallowed based on the contpenshtion <br />analysis tial Jacobs perlorms annually. As part of this analysis. senior executives were benchmarked to <br />surreys in which Jacobs participated. The overall Iesulls of the compensation analysis showed that the <br />THIS DOCUMENT -CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL ANI) PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THAT HAS COMMERCIAL ANWOR FINANCIAL VALUE <br />SUCH INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PUBLICLY DISCLOSED AND I5 EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER THE FREEDOM Or <br />iNFOR1MATION ACT AND ALL OTHER SIMILAR LEGISLATION. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. REQUESTS WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE <br />ANY PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IS IAADE. <br />9of15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.