HomeMy WebLinkAboutJohn Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection RouteParks & Recreation Plan Project Narrative
1. Project Description: Please describe the project in detail. Indicate the major work to be
completed, any milestones that need to be overcome in order for the project to move forward,
and include a comparison of existing and proposed conditions. Included the anticipated
completion date.
The name of this project is the John Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Route. As the name indicates,
this is 4.6 mile trail that connects the John Wayne Pioneer Trail (JWPT) around the northern part of
Ellensburg. The JWPT currently ends on the west and east edges of Ellensburg. This section of trail has
been missing since the trail was created in the 1980's. The trail features will include a trailhead north of
the Kittitas County Event Center, a pedestrian and bike linkage to Central Washington University (CWU),
a linkage north through private to the Kittitas County owned Bowers Airport, Kiwanis Park, North Alder
Street Park and McElroy Park, new residential development in northwest Ellensburg, Ellensburg School
District facilities, and the historic downtown district. Surfacing will include paved and unpaved surfaces
to accommodate the diversity of users. Landscaping and lighting will be used to enhance the experience
of the trail user and neighbors and to buffer them from the surrounding land uses.
To date the City, in partnership with CWU and private property owners, have constructed .21 miles of
trail with another .48 miles of trail scheduled to be completed by the end of 2016.
As with many large scale projects the biggest hurdle to completing the project is funding. There is no
dedicated revenue source for this project. Completed, or soon to be completed, sections of trail have
been funded through a variety of grants and partnerships with private citizens. As a result there is no
anticipated completion date for the project.
2. Kittitas County Parks and Recreation Plan: Please explain how the project meets the goals and
priorities in the Kittitas County Parks and Recreation Plan as adopted. Also, describe the specific
parks and/or recreation needs the project addresses and how the project directly increases,
enhances, and/or maintains parks and/or recreation opportunities in the County.
PROS Goal 1 Strategic Role -The County Parks & Recreation Plan, calls for a strategic approach in the
development and operation of developing open space and trails. This project is a partnership project
between CWU, the City, State Parks, private citizens and Kittitas County.
PROS Goal 2 Recreation Program - The County Parks & Recreation Plan calls for the promotion of
healthy eating habits and active lifestyle programs and outreach activities of special interest and lifestyle
benefits for county residents. The development of the JWPT provides a resource for county residents to
enjoy a healthier lifestyle.
PROS Goal 6 Trail Trail Systems — Facilitate the planning, development, and operation of a variety of
countywide trails. Work with public and private agencies to develop and maintain an integrated system
of trails.
3. Real Property: If real property acquisition is a component of the project, please explain.
The trail alignment is located on both private and public property. In terms of percentages, 56% of the
trail alignment is on publically owned property and 44% is on private property. Private property owners
have provided letters of support for the trail and are willing to work with the public agencies on the
development of the trail.
4. Coordination: Please explain how this project is being coordinated with other entities as well as
affected stakeholders. Please include letters of support from stakeholders and partner
agencies.
Representatives from the public agencies meet on a semi -regular basis to talk about trail development.
The trail plan is identified on the public agencies master plans, non -motorized transportation plans, park
plans, and capital improvement plans. In 2003 a Charter Agreement was signed by each of the four
public agencies (CWU, City, County, State Parks) which states that each agency agrees to do what they
can to get the trail built.
5. Studies: Please attach feasibility or other studies that demonstrate linkages between the
proposed project and the anticipated outcomes.
The John Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study was completed 2001. This is a 73 page document
that explains project need, trail location, trail cross-sections, letters of support and cost estimates.
6. Applicant Certification: Please sign below in agreement with the statement of certification.
Certification is hereby given that the information provided is accurate and the applicable attachments
are c plete and included as a part of the application package.
Signature of Representative Titles i�Date
b 1tiL
City of
Jolu z a ne RTra-H
-1W HE ELS NSBU IG GRIEF NWAY
Preparedfor
ScottArcber, Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Ellensburg Wasbington
September zoor
B A R K E R
LANDSCAPE
ARCIIITEM, ES.
1514 NW 52nd Sheet
Seattle, WA 98107
tel 206:783.2870
fax 206.783.3212
B4.28
johi-OMayne Pioneer Trail
THE ELLENsBuRG GREE AY
Reconnection Study
FINAL REPORT
Prepared far
ScottArcher, Director of Parks and Recreation
City ofE`llensburg, Washington
c
INTRODUCTION ......................................... z
-Executive Summary..................................3
Trail Reconnection Plan ........................4
PROJECT BACKGROUND .....................5
-list of Stakeholders.....................................7
-Steering Committee's Visions..................8
-History of Project ................................
....io
-Citizen Involvement................................ii
-Summary of First Public Meeting ...........
iz
-Routes Considered. ................................ 16
PREFERRED ROUTE ..........................zo
The Preferred Plan ................................2I
-North Bypass Trail Description.............22
-Segment A, B, C Enlargement...............23
Winegar Triangle Site..................24
-SepnentA Description & Photos ..... .z5
-Segment A Enlargement/Sections ........ 26
- Segment B Description & Photo ...... 28
-Segment B Enlargement/Sections........z9
-Segment C Description & Photos .... 31
-Segment C Enlargement/Sections ........ 32
- Segment D Description & Photos .... 34
-Airport Road Crossing ...................... 35
-Segment D Enlargement/Sections ........ 36
-Segment E Description & Photos ..... 38
-Segment E Enlargement/Sections ....... 39
-Segment F Description & Photos .... 41
-Segment F Enlargement/Sections ....... 42
-Segment G Description & Photos .... 45
-Alder & ioth Plan......................46
-Segment F Enlargement/Sections ....... 47
- Segment H Description & Photos ... 49
-Reconnection at Fairgrounds.............5o
-Segment H Sections.....................5z
-Segment I Description & Photos ... 52
-Segment I Enlargement/Sections ....... 53
- SegxnentJ Description & Photos ... 54
-Segment J Enlargement .....................55
IMPLEMENTATION ..........................56
Trail Corridor Aquisition ......................56
Acquistion Map..............................................57
Table of priority private land acquisition ......
58
-Operation and Maintenance ................... 59
-Costs.........................................................
61
Spreadsheets....... ..............................
62
-Action Plan ...............................................64
-Conclusion & Recommendations.............65
APPENfDIX....................................66
-Draft Interagency Agreement .....................66
-Letters & Notes.............................................68
-References & Sources ............................72
-Personal Contacts....................................73
-Fairgrounds with new trailhead............ 74
31obn Wiayue Fiuneer T1nil Reconnection Study Final Reparx September 2001
1
City of Ellensburg
�o�m Wayne Pioneer Trao
RECONNECTION STUDY
ISSUES FOR ELLENSBURG & KTITITAS COUNTY RESIDENTS IN RECONNECTING
THE JOHN WAYNE TRAIL
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study is to determine the best and most feasible reconnection of the John
Wayne trail through Ellensburg, Washington. The goal is to create the highest quality trail
experience serving the needs of Ellensburg residents and visitors, who will be the primary
beneficiaries of the trail system. Trails are the the most popular recreational facilities in the
nation. The Ellensburg Greenbelt trail is envisioned as a safe walking, cross-country skiing,
jagging, bicycling and horseback riding path that will link Ellensburg residents to some of the
best features of the the City and Kittitas Valley. This urban trail will make great rural connec-
tions.
The trail will also "reconnect" the Cross -State John Wayne Pioneer Trail which currently ends
on the east and west edges of the City of Ellensburg. This has been a missing link for trail
users since the trail was created in .the i98o's. The trail features will include a trailhead north of
the fairgrounds, a pedestrian & bike linkage to Central Washington University (CWUJ), a
linkage north through private lands to Bowers Field County airport, Kiwanis Park, northern
neighborhoods and the historic downtown. Surfacing will include paved and unpaved surfaces
to accommodate the diversity of users. Landscaping and lighting will be used to enhance the
experience of the trail user and neighbors and to buffer them from the surrounding land uses.
Rodeo -goers on the Trail near the Kittitds County Fairgrounds
John Wjy r+e Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
Executive Summary
Washington State's Cross State trail is passable now from near North Bend to the west side of
Ellensburg, providing 76 miles of non -motorized corridor. From the east side of Ellensburg, the
trail extends another 32 miles to the Columbia River, and and will eventually connect to the
Idaho border. Ellensburg's urban trail system will link these trails together. This report pre-
sents a plan to create an exceptional urban greenway for the City. The resulting connected trail
ties over iio miles of continuous recreational trail together.
Central Washington University is supportive of a direct link for bicycles and pedestrians
through campus, but horses and wagons would go north from the existing trail to loop around
the campus and urban area and reconnect on both sides of the City. The project's goal is to
develop a realistic route around the campus to bypass primarily for horses and wagons, but also
to develop plans for an urban greenbelt for Ellensburg.
In the past year, the Ellensburg Parks and Recreation Department has held 16 meetings to
develop a feasible route and strategy to get it approved and funded. These meetings have
included a diverse Stakeholder's Steering Committee, several Public Agencies, the Citizens, the
City Council, and private landowners along the potential routes. In this process a plan that
could create an Ellensburg Greenbelt has emerged.
Various jurisdictions are involved, with the City of Ellensburg Parks and Recreation Depart-
ment as the lead agency. Kittitas County is a major player with the Fairgrounds, Airport
property and County ROW's potentially involved for the corridor. Washington State Parks
and Recreation Commission is a significant landowner and manager for the rural route, and
Central Washington University is critical to the success of the project since they are di-
rectly between the two ends of the trail. Several private landowners are involved with whom we
have had discussions. The plan that is presented in this report could create an Ellensburg
Greenbelt (some have suggested the"Blue Agate Greenbelt") looping around the City.
The result is a plan which creates a six- mile loop around northern Ellensburg. The trail
would create an urban greenway that would be linked to the farmlands, canyons, mountains and
forests of Kittitas County, and to the Columbia Basin and Puget Sound urban areas. The long
term benefits of this trail include higher property values, better recreation and transportation
systems, enhanced fitness opportunities close to residents, as well as an excellent feature to
improve the quality of fife in the Ellensburg community. This study recommends adoption of
this plan by the City Council this year to allow for several grant applications beginning in zoo2.
The preferred route is consistent with plans that were concieved years ago; many of the issues
have been worked out in greater detail, and we recommend the fotlowi ng steps be taken:
i. adoption of the concept
2. acquistion of the corridor and
3. opertional discussions and agreements to be made with agencies and landowners
4. apply for grants for construction
John WL(syne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
3
d ,�— "' 12 a U,2 q _ p6u p�� L� s fi � '� -• °a�1s� 3 _ "
IV
It
_
"� �•�.7�4L-.-��a �-.e� —� �i�y-. �-- � e " ,..� `,,,,.,`ate
n;
n _
0..,�'
Li
s nib Sia p 1uF;vu
4r -
Fj
Win
U � �� � ., � i ' _ mac°°•� �' f a c ff I
v�TIE
i. .n.. F#.deo ,S "E t. a.f
a
11. Project Background
The purpose of this study is to determine the best and most feasible reconnection of the John
Wayne trail. The John Wayne Pioneer Trail is part of Washington State's Cross -state Iron
Horse State Park trail system, which follows the route of the former "Milwaukee Road" Rail-
road. Linking the trail directly through the CWU campus has been considered, as well as a
northern and southern bypass route. There is support for the central "direct -link" concept,
however use by horses and wagons through a dense urban campus creates many potential con-
flicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, vehicles and horses.
Over the past 6 years, a northern John Wayne Trail QW f) bypass route around CWU has been
studied by the City of Ellensburg, Kittitas County, and the State Parks & Recreation Commis-
sion. This bypass is intended for horses and wagons that will be using the cross state regional
trail. A campus and southern route option were also explored (CWU, `98) but are not as fea-
sible as the northern route due to dense urban development and several road and highway
crossings. The southern route that has been considered would connect the John Wayne Pioneer
Trail to Irene Rhienhart park which extends along the Yakima River. However this route is a
long way out of the way with many obstacles (including 1 -go), many road crossings and devel-
oped areas. The Central route through the campus is a direct link, but it is problematic to mix
horses and wagon with bikes and pedestrians.
The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission encouraged and assisted in obtaining
funds for a new and more thorough study to look at various options to reconnect the route for
the variety of users including equestrians. The best route is clearly the northern bypass route.
In designing the trail system several issues need to be considered. Foremost among these are
the concerns of landowners, managers and citizens along the trail corridor. Without their
support the reconnection of the trail would not be feasible. Some of the issues of greateast
concern are privacy, safety and crime, trespassing, and property values. These issues are dis-
cussed and recommendations have been presented for each issue.
,john Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
5
TRESPASSING: Good fences and signage usually prevent or discourage trespassing. Neighbors
of other portions of the John Wayne Trail have not experienced problems with trespassing
(State Parks, zooi). In most trail segments, new fences are proposed along with signage.
PROPERTY VALUES Lifestyle features like recreational trails usually increase property values,
because homeowners value the recreational opportunities that come with having close access to
the walking, cross-country skiing, jrggng, bicycling and horseback riding pathways. Near
Reecer Creek Road west of Ellensburg a new street has been named `Trail View Lane' indicating
potent
Richland' Shelterbelt Trail is over So years old
PRIVACY: Many concepts discussed involve an urban trail corridor which includes landscaping
similar to the image shown above. In this picture of Richland's Shelterbelt Trail„ fencing, and
several rows of trees and shrubs protect the privacy of neighbors. All Ellensburg trail segments
proposed in this plan include extensive tree planting.
SAFETY & CiRME: Studies of existing trails generally have found that trails and greenways do
not make neighborhoods unsafe. No incidents are reported by Washington State Parks along
the John Wayne Trail in it's io years of existence. The Burke Gilman trail in Seattle has been
studied extensively and proves to be no less safe than other Seattle neighborhoods, and safer
than many. (Seattle Engineering Department, 1988). Typically the greater the presence of
people along a trail or in a park increases the perception and reality of visitor safety. Connect-
ing residential areas and the schools (especially CW J) with these trails can increase users along
the trails.
John Wayne Pioneer Frail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
6
Stere Holders
philL Wayne Flio eer Tri
RECONNECTION STUDY
Staali,eholder's Advisory Cottee
CONTACT NIST
Scott 7771er, 017ectorJohn
Ellensburg Parks & Recreation Dept.
Barker "ndscapc Arctutects
"'q NW 5z°" Street, Seattle, WA 98107
420 North Pearl Street
206-783--2870 • 206-783-3zr2 Fax
Ellensburg, WA 98926
zz2 Fast Fourth Street, Ellensburg, WA
509-.975-8638 962-7227 fax
98926 • 509'933-2872
email archers@c1.ellensbur&wa.us
Email barkerlag.aal..com
John Akers, Ph
Director
Gnan arter, Park manager
Gingko-Wanapum State Park
Ellensbu Public Forks
P.O. Box 1203
41st, lw{orth Main Street.
Vantage, WA 9895o
Ellensburg, WA 9.891-6
5oq-856-2700
Ellensburg Parks & Recreation
ChuckMichael ruse
Cruse and Nelson Surveyors
Commissioner
PO Box 959
1004 E.4th Ellensburg 98926
Ellensburg, WA 98926
925-7638
509-925-4747
Bill V rxtrees, Facilities Manager
Central Washington University
Steve Willard
Blazing Thee Ranches
400 E. S,h Avenue
2000 U4t Avenue N.E. Suite B-ioo
Ellensburg, WA 98926
Bellevue, WA 98005
5og-963- 01'1 509-963"1015 fax
509-96x.-2220 tellfax 425-883-7800
4x5-453`1709 fax cell 2o6 -66o -z73&
email swtmc.aol.com
Sean Maupin,
Ellensburg Parks & Recreation
_75-3E fInce
Happy Trails Horse Ranch
Commissioner
P.D. I3vx 3x
PO Box 401
Easton, WA
Ellensbur&, WA 98926 962-5784
5o9-656-2634
seanmau m0hotmail.com
MeL hheyner, President
Kittitas County Fair Board
Vaul lk'nnetr'PE
Public Works Director
1331 Cascade 'Way
Kitticas County Public. Works Department
Room
Ellensburg, WA. 98926
z0 West 5`h, 108
800-552-0766
El ensburg, WA 98926
962-2005
5w)-962-7523 96.2-7663 fiat
Tian Hovis, Park Planner
Washington State Parks & Recreation
Commission
71SO Clearwater Lane P.O. Box 42650
Olympia, WA 985o4: -265o
1-800 z-0 66 62-2oo
_7ohn Wiyne Pioneer 71nil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
THE JOHN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION ADvISORY COMMITTEES VISION
STATEMENTS:
Steve Willard, Blazing Tree Ranches: Steve envisions a separated non -motorized trail that
would include both urban and rural segments, which would connect the regional trail, the
fairgrounds, downtown, CWU and other schools, residential areas, and the airport properties,
including the wetland area at the county property. The trail should include landscaping, light-
ing, appropriate surfacing and City maintenance.
Paul Bennett, Kittitas County Public Works: Paul feels the County Airport property is a
huge public asset (goo acres in size) which should be connected to the city via a trail. A loop
path, flood control, and passive recreation features could enhance the value of these public
lands.
Chuck Cruse, Cruse & Nelson, Lard Surveyors: Chuck recommends finding the most
direct route to connect the two trail ends, preferably on existing public Rights -of -Way. 14th
Avenue has an 8o foot wide ROW and should be considered.
Sean .Mar:p in, Parks & Recreation Commissioner: Sean feels there should be a down-
town route which offers interpretive viewing opportunities, city camping near Craig's Hill,
public art, stables at both trailheads, and a broad coordinated effort to enhance urban tourism
in the historical center of the city.
Scott Archer, Parks & Recreation Director: Scott's vision is for a cooperatively developed
regional and local urban non -motorized system which connects to the existing rural trails. This
interagency effort should connect the park system, via the Campus to Canyon trail, the airport,
schools, fairgrounds, the residential areas and downtown.
a young bicyclist along the Trail in upper Kittitas County
_7obn Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
8
Brian Carter, Gingko-Wanapunxi State Park: Though the current Ellensburg "gap" is
okay for pedestrians and bicycles, the horses and wagons need a better route, and the best one
is north through CWU to the airport. CWU has a great opportunity to connect a horse and
wagon bypass route as well as a bike and pedestrian more direct route.
Brian Hovis, Washington State Parks Planner: The Ellensburg urban bypass segment of
the JWT is definitely more of a paved multipurpose urban trail, and the CWU campus route is
okay for bicycles and pedestrans, but not for horses and wagons. Much of the northern eques-
trian route is public land, and it could be a City -maintained multi-purpose trail. There is a need
for a separate agreement between the city and private landowners if there is an easement
granted. Lastly, Brian wanted to emphasize that the Iron Horse State Park Master Plan calls for
trailheads at either end of town.
Bill Vertrees, CWU IF, liLixtagement Director: There are some exciting changes
planned at the CWU campus that are quality of life facilities, many of which are consistent with
the objectives of the John Wayne Trail. Mixing equestrians and pedestrians on campus is diffi-
cult and clear separation is needed. Some relevant goals at CWU is to find ways to make the
core of campus non -motorized (between iP and 8th , Alder and D Streets); and to reroute the
power lines outside of the campus.
Mel Sheyner, Kittitas County Fair ]Board President: The Fairgrounds is the center of the
equestrian activity area, and are close to CWU, downtown, farms and residences, and this will
be improved with the trail connected on both ends of the City. The Fairground master plan
includes improved camping, stables, an equestrian pavillion, as well as a trail head facility.
Jack Price, JohnWayne Pioneer Horses and W:asons: This is a unique coincidence of
geography and a great opportunity for recreation, transportation and education. This is also an
opportunity to celebrate our equestrian heritage. Build the trail and they will come.
s;'..c f ■= yyh '
The John Wayne Pioneer Wagons and Riders on their Annual Cross State Ride
John Wayne Pioneer rail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
9
History of Project
The Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad (commonly called the Milwaukee Road) ran
through Ellensburg from igog until ig80. The depot in Ellensburg was completed in igio and
served as a division headquarters and a point for the crew to change. In addition, the depot
helped the City of Ellensburg grow. The Milwaukee Railroad ran through Central Washington
University's campus, bringing many students who lived out of town to campus.
In ig8o, the Milwaukee Railroad abandoned the Pacific Extension. The 213 mile section of
the railroad bed, through a number of acquisitions and negotiations, was acquired in 1981 by
the Department of Natural Resources. This section was then turned over to the Washington
State Parks Department and named the Iron Horse State Park, with the eastern segment from
Snoqualmie to the Columbia River named the John Wayne Pioneer Trail. The State Park Trail
is designated for non motorized recreation with an emphasis on horsback riding. The trail
runs from Rattlesnake Lake (near North Bend) to the Columbia River (south of Vantage) with
the only missing segment of the trail being through Central Washington University's campus in
Ellensburg.
The former Ellensburg Depot, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad, located near the CWU campus
(courtesy Kittitas County Historical Society)
,%bn Wayne Pioneer ?hail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
10
m a
l�'i_.
2000-20011 Process
for the
John Wayne Pioneer Trail Project
Beginning in August of 2000, Scott Archer and John Barker began working to assemble a Stake-
holder Steering Committee (see page 7), and upon agreement by the initial 114 members, sched-
uled the first kickoff meeting in September 2000. Below is a summary of the meetings that
were held to develop the plans and routes.
September 22, 2000 First Steering Committee Meeting
January 10, 20011
Draft reports to all Steering Committee members
January ig- Feb. 1
Door to door discussions with Willow Street/Pioneer Rd. residents
February 8, 20011
Second Steering Committee Meeting 9 am
City Council Chambers
February 115, 20011
Public Meeting #i to present best trail route 7 pm
City Council Chambers
March 29, 2001
Third Steering Committee Meeting Meeting 9 am
City Council Chambers
February -May
Landowner meetings, coordinate with Public Works, Fairgrounds,
State Parks, Linders, Wmegars, Carmody, Peterson, Woods.
April 8, 20011
Public Meeting #2 to present refinements, costs, phasing
May June, 20011
Draft Report; Funding strategies, Action Plan, Recommendations
June July 2001
Final Steering Committee and Public Meeting
July 2001
Report refinements, Funding strategies, Action Plan
August 2001
Site/Corridor measurements, Preliminary Construction Docu-
ments, Cost refinements
September, 2001
Final Public Meeting at Park Commissioner's Meeting
October, 20011
Council Adoption
,7ohn Wayne Pioneer 71 -ail Reconnection Study Fiscal Report September 2001
11
Summary of the First Public Meeting for
The Jori Wayne Pioneer Mrd Reconnection Project
The first public meeting to present preliminary concepts for the Reconnection of the John
Wayn Trail was held at the City Council Chambers at 7 pm Thursday, February 15, 20oi. Ap-
proximately 35 citizens and officials attended the meeting. Included were several Steering
Committee members, including Scott Archer, Bill Vertrees, Paul Bennett( Kittitas County
Public Works Director), Brian Carter, Gingko-Wanapum State Park, Sean Maupin (Parks &
Recreation Commissioner), Jack Price, John Wayne Pioneer Horses and NVagons, Ellensburg
Mayor John Perrie, City Councilmembers Ed Barry, Howard Collins and Dick Brown. A partial
list of attendees (those who signed in) is available from the Parks & Recreation Department.
Introahie ion
Scott Archer, Ellensburg Parks & Recreation Director, introduced the meeting, and described
how the City received a grant from the State of Washington to study options for the
reconnection of the Cross State John Wayne Pioneer Trail through the City of Ellensburg. The
State and the City are interested in reconnecting the trail through the City to complete the
unprecedented 290 mile cross state trail. John Barker, the City's consulting landscape architect,
presented the project and findings to date. He described the formation of a Steering Commit-
tee, it's members, their vision for the trail, and some of the study conclusions.
As a result of working with the committee and exploring many options, it was concluded that
the northern John Wayne Trail UWT) bypass route for horses and wagons was still a logical and
feasible option to pursue. A southern route (to Irene Rheinhart Park, the Yakima River and the
Campus to Canyon Trail) was explored and was considered a valuable plan for the City's non -
motorized system but not for the JWT bypass. In addition, a central pedestrian and bicycle
route through the CWU campus was explored providing a direct and well -used connection, but
possibly difficult for horses and wagons to fit into the campus circulation. A brief description
of the routes that had been studied were presented, along with these conclusions with illustra-
tions of the different segments and options, such as Richland's Shelterbelt Trail.
John 917ceyne Pioneer David Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
12
Other ejects
Paul Bennett, Kittitas County Public Works Director has three major projects that could affect
the trail, including i) Reecer Creek Roadway Improvements, 2) Bowers Road Roadway Im-
provements, and 3) the County Airport Master Plan. Reecer Creek Road is the project that
maybe constructed earliest, probably in 2ooi or 2oo2. Bowers Road is expected to be under-
way in 2002 or 2003.
Mr. Bennett suggested that another route for the trail be identified along Bender and Sanders
Road, though this route would have serious impacts to the existing resident and farms along
these existing. developed areas. The Airport Master Plan is being done this year also, and the
trail and a landscape buffer is likely to be part of the southern edge of the airport property
(Kittitas County Public Works, 2oo2). The status as of this writing is that the earliest Bowers
could be permitted and built would be late zoo2 or 2003, but would likely include a 30-6o foot
buffer along the south side alowing for a utility and recreation corridor
2.ec, Fu.Feeq �r /�-�- C.� /cd. -.. /�7l i s�.r•f�.
r
Bill Vertrees, Facilities Director at CWU, pointed out sevei possible campus projects that are
in the planning and design stages, including a new Music Building, a new Campus Recreation
Center, and a new Student Union. All of these projects could benefit from a non -motorized
connection to other parts of the campus and community. Major utility upgrades along the 14th
Street and/or Ganges Canal may provide opportunities for a through -campus non -motorized
route.
Private projects that may affect the trail include Steve Willar&s Blazing Tree Ranches plans for
his fields north of the campus, including multi -family and single family neighborhoods. Though
not able to attend, Steve Willard has long supported a non -motorized linear park connection
through his property to the north and south.
goon Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
13
Horse & Faders
Jack Price, equestrian advocate, spoke about the horseback and wagon users of the trail and the
long experience they have with the history of getting the trail corridor acquired, developed and
working with the neighboring land owners to build support for the multi-purpose recreational
trail. Jack's stories about the State analyzing the multi -billion dollar value of this remarkable
cross -state right of way back in the ig8o's (purchased for a mere $i.i million) is testament to the
great vision of all of the stakeholders. This link through Ellensburg, perhaps the "horse capital"
of Washington State, is a very important segment of the trail system.
Citizen Comments
Several citizens attending the meeting pointed out that the land available for the trail connec-
tion is being developed for new housing and we shouldn't wait any longer to establish the trail
corridor as public policy. One citizen voiced concern about the unsafe intersection at Brick
Road/Willow/Vantage Highway, and how unsafe this is as a pedestrian crossing now with high-
way traffic coming into the city, and did not feel the safety flag crossing system would work at
this location. Some citizens felt that the trail should avoid existing residential areas where
possible and particularly avoid Willow and nearby established neighborhoods. One route that
was suggested is to head east from Sanders to Pfennig Road, crossing the highway at an existing
safer interesection at Knudsen's Lumber.
Willow Street was an option that was considered in earlier trail routes, but not generally a
popular route for the residents along the street. Some of the citizens attending the meeting felt
that a trail along Willow Street would be too noisy for their neighborhood. They said it is
currently too noisy now from college students using the street. An option to the Willow Street
corridor is Alder Street, one block to the west, which is also a potentially better crossing of the
Vantage Highway. According to the City of Ellensburg, there will be a signalized intersection at
Alder and Euclid at some point in the near future, which increases the safety of the highway
crossing for the trail.
_?;ohn'Wayne Pioneer Frail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
14
State Park hunger Lance Elliot, who is responsible for maintaining the existing State Park
trail from Thorp to the Columbia River, pointed out that his observations from working with
neighbors along the trail outside the City is that the trail has been a good neighbor, and he has
not heard complaints about noise or litter. In fact, trail users have, been observed to pick up
litter along the trail.
Implen-tentation
How will the trail get built? Many steps will be necessary, but the most critical one is to get the
corridor defined and established in public policy documents and to get options and agreements
on the critical pieces of property for Community leaders to pursue. The City Council will
consider plans soon, and we are now preparing cost estimates for various options. The total
cost to acquire ROW and build the trail may approach $1.5 to 3.5 million depending on many
variables, such as exact routes, widths, and how many features are included. The City's portion
of this cost could be as little as ao% or as much as 75%, depending on many variables, such as
availability of State, Federal matching grants and City project funds. Implementation can occur
as part of the other projects that are mentioned above, and as part of the City's parks, recre-
ation and public works projects over the next2o-3o years. It is obviously critical to have a
corridor and vision in hand first, to avoid being faced with new developments blocking the path
of the trail corridor.
Email from Kittitas County Public Works Department
z/o1
John,
Just wanted to compliment you on the public meering for the John Wayne
Trail Connection. I think you were able to bring out a lot ofgreatpoints
andgotpeople thinking. Itgot me thinking. Ifthe college is willin& I
think the best route for the John Wayne Trail connection is upAlder and
down Dean Nicholson Ave. Its the shortest, most direct route. The crossing
of Vanatagd&b street is a better location. Apply the concept that you
have for Willow street, trail down the middle, street on either side. But
what I really thought was that the designs and concept should not be
mutually exclusive. Although the JWT mightgo through CPU, I think we
should still proceed ahead and establish a trail/buffer along the airport,
bowers road and reecer creek. The idea ofa buffer and trailsystem along
the northern part of the city that also connects to a trail around the
airport may seem foolish now, but in 2o-3 o, years it maybe a highlight of the
city. "Its a fine line that separates a visionary from a fool."I'd like to
have the firm working our airport masterplan include this in ourplanning.
Thanx again far a great meeting
Paul Bennett
John Wayne Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
15
Routes Considered
This project was initiated in the 199os. A Task Force and CWU studies were mobilized in the
mid 19go's to address the reconnection. A Northern Route, a Campus Route and a Southern
Route have been proposed, with various pros and cons for each. Some of the adapted work
done by CWU is summarized and follows.
Trails along each route could increase the non -motorized options in Ellensburg, and make the
whole City and Campus more livable. The focus however, is on finding a viable link for the
cross state trail that will be a tremendous asset to the citizens of Kittitas County and the City
of Ellensburg.
North
""ypaa Bowers Road
•,, — ®®.route
ter"'•,, � 1
1''i, r'r_ � Bender
T.'. n''•,1r d CWU
�.� err
•r y:
e fpr Enka A m
Downtown
Ellensburg
Southern
River Route
%; .
N 1A
A._"- k
Fairgrounds .`•-,,,,,
John Wayne Pioneer Trail Recoruiecdon Routes
Considered through Ellensburg
Jobn Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
16
A Central Washington University class in the Geography and Land Studies Department in 11998
developed three possible routes to reconnect the Iron Horse State Park through or around
Ellensburg. The students attended public meetings and forums, and developed and presented a
proposed project. The student group constructed an informational website and made a pro-
posal to the city planners. The report was good background, but needed the focus and details
of a workable realistic plan to prepare for funding and operational agencies.
THE SOUTHERNROUTE would help connect and create a great Ellensburg Park System,
including a greenway along Umptanum Road, connecting the WDFW site, (with passage under
Interstate go), the redeveloping Schaake Property, Irene Rinehart Riverfront Park, the golf
course and the meandering forested ripirian corridor along the dynamic Yakima River, which is
one of the best recreational and natural features of Kittitas County. The Campus to Canyon Trail is
part of the new Central Washington Sports Park project, which could connect to the John Wayne
Trail near the Fairgrounds.
The proposed southern route begins where The Iron Horse State Park meets Reecer Creek road. It heads south
through pastureland and under the Cascade Way overpass. From there the route heads further south through more
pasture and along the side of Pott road. The trail then crosses Dolarway and cuts across the side of Anderson Hay
and Grain property. At the south end of the Anderson Hay and Grain property the trail follows a creek/riparian
area and travels underneath I -go into the middle of the Irene Rinehart Riverfront Park. Here people can stop, use
the restrooms and BBQ facilities, take a swim, or fish. The proposed trail then travels east, through the park and
out to Umptanum road. Here it runs parallel to Umptanum and along side pasture into the commercial area. At
the commercial area, people can stop, get something to eat, use restrooms, or even make hotel reservations. The
trail travels through the commercial area across Canyon road and along side a bird sanctuary. The trail goes east
through the sanctuary and across Bull road. It then travels through an agricultural area to No. 6 road. The trail
travels north up No. 6 until it meets the Iron Horse State Park Trail once again.
Comments: This route is a long way to reconnect the trail and there would be numerous difficult acquisitions or
easements to obtain.
3;obn Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
17
THE CAMPUS ROUTE
The campus offers several wide streets and an irrigation canal that re -connect the multipurpose trail in the
most direct manner. CWU participants will clearly need to be a major part of the discussion, but it would
be great to connect the rural areas on both sides of town to the campus and some of the most interesting
neighborhoods in the City. Similar to the CWU Campus, the Burke Gilman trail through Seattle and the
University of Washington is an excellent example of a multi -use urban trail.
The benefits to the reconnection of the John Wayne Trail through Central Washington University are
numerous. The trail would act as a non motorized link between scholastic institutions of the Ellensburg area
including the university, high school, middle schools and elementary schools. The trail would provide the
possibility for design and development by students in many disciplines of study as a hands on learning
experience both in the plan and use of the trail. For instance, botany classes could develop natural vegeta-
tion communities along the trail, while business students might handle financing the up keep of the trail,
even art could be integrated along the corridor. (CWU, 1998)
,7obn Mayne Pioneer Anil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
18
The trail would present an established route for not only students but recreational community users and tourists.
Besides providing a safe, connective route between campus and other schools, the trail would be a community
connection to many key locations such as Craig's Hill, the Kittitas County Fairgrounds, Reed Park, Kiwanis Park,
and Historical Downtown Ellensburg. This would result in improved relationships and awareness between campus
and community.
The Campus route makes sense except for horses and wagons, which present many liabilities
and conflicts with pedestrians and parking lots.
THE N®WFH ROUTE
The CWU study identified the northern route turning from the established Iron Horse Trail east of Dry Creek
Road. There is a small creek that heads northeast, and stays west of the subdivision off of Sanders Road, which
the route continues along until it intercepts Cascade Irrigation Canal. At this point the route turns southeast and
follows the canal. The proposed north route veers off the canal and turns south to pass through Central Wash-
ington University property, until it reaches Alder Street. The route follows Alder Street to the Kittitas County
Fairgrounds where it meets the already established portion of the Iron Horse Trail.
The proposed north route would require cooperation from the City of Ellensburg, Central Washington University,
and private landowners. This route links the city to the campus and the campus to an area of low population
density.
The north route connects the currently discontinuous trail, making it available to multiple users, including the
equestrian users. In the past, the equestrian users have been crucial to establishing the Iron Horse Trail and
helping to maintain it. In addition, bicyclists, walkers, runners and other users would have a trail that lead away
from the city, but is still easily accessible from town or from the college campus.
The obstacles to the proposed north route are that it would cross several parcels of private property. In addition,
it crosses through Central Washington University and the policy concerning horses on campus must be changed to
allow this route to be created. The north route maybe too long for walkers or joggers to enjoy the full length of
the trail.
,7obn Mayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
19
Preferred Route
In the past year, The Ellensburg Parks and Recreation Department has held 16 meetings and
assessed several optional methods to develop a reconnection of the Cross State Trail through.
Ellensburg. These meeting have included the John Wayne Trail Reconnection Steering Com-
mittee, Public Agencies, the Citizens, the Parks & Recreation Commission, the City Council,
and private landowners along the potential routes. In this process a plan that could create an
Ellensburg Greenbelt has emerged.
The preferred route is consistent with plans that were concieved years ago; many of the issues
have been worked out in greater detail, and we recommend the following steps be taken:
i. adoption of the concept
z. acquistion of the corridor and
3. opertional discussions and agreements to be made with agencies and landowners
4. apply for grants for construction
The Northern Bypass route is much more than a route for horses and wagons a few times a
year. It could be a wonderful separated greenway system (like the Yakima Greenway, Spokane's
Centennial Trail, or the Wenatchee River Trail System) that are both recreational and trans-
portation systems, and land use buffers that increase property values and enhance quality of life
for families and businesses in Ellensburg.
_Tohn Wayne Pioneer frail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
20
Fill
R- 441F
�r f x' Re erk h'oaci �ej]�j �yV
1 s a 4 �• �•� , f — +ems+
P -ra17.00, 1i
RAE,=.-L.. � � $ ,Ca �'' • 3,Il111. G:sd l'i'd33gitt -r� ty
Eff
yam. rte . C 3
EEEZ
E
or
In 11
""'" • "ti, \ ``� - Via` A ' -a , r � E
�'�� :� � �-.�.+.r- i sti. 1 - ._ csrra.,r.rrry�_-.-. .�+RC••t�arj � B u
Lr -_=Ll- - s
FIE
_�
1d'
NO:tTij BYR4ss TRAIL DESCRIPTION:
Beginning from the existing trail west of the city of Ellensburg, the route that is described here
begins east of Reecer Creek Road approximately 3/4 mile, near the north -south Cora Street/
Rasmussen Road Right of Way. The new trail would turn north here if a public easement could
be acquired from private landowners.
view from Reecer Creep Road to east towards Ellensburg
(The existing trail now ends at Water Street 3/4 mile further east of the bypass, where a
tradhead may be developed on State Land near the Mt. Stuart Elementary School site. Accord-
ing to the .iron Horse State park A'Vlaster Plan (NVSPRC,1999) the trailhead would be developed
in conjuction with. the City ofEUensburg. This trailhead could include parking, equestrian
loading facilities, and restrooms.
View west along the trail near where the north bypass would begin (on the right side ofthephoto)
John L gyne Pioneer TSrail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
22
FI-XUP ON'SED WAYNE
' see section drazoings & ph
segment C
3000 Ft'
Bowers Rd. potential ROVs
tiVhiskey Cr. Crossin Cascad
•, ?
ouch edge of Various Bowers routes) CZ
owner: private
Additional ROW required -Cx ' ,�
C3 --
land use: pasture/ hayfield
rr Bated Land
AL
B7
V- Whiskey Cr, Crossing B Z T
segment & CU—
v-
2595 Ft.
along Rasmussen Road
Bender Rd. to Bowers route -I
owner: Private/Kittitas County \ 1�4
qV
f Possible additional ROW required
and use: pasture/ hayfield � O
future residential (U '
Bender Road Crossin A521
segment A.*
2900 Ft
Existing trail to Bender Rd. p
along Rasmussen Road alignment
1 owner private adjacent to Co. ROW
Additional 8011 required ,--................
...
land use: pasture/ hayfield
E. Water o. an ossmeAl
\x,
Winegar Park
Proposed John Wayne Trail
Northern Bypass Route
r 1; Proposed John Wayne trail y
Bicycle/Pedestrain Route
Linear Park/ Urban Growth
Boundary �
Major Trail
Head/ Reconnection Point
-Ji-
Parkin
g Facilities
The Winegar Triangle Site is a corner of the Winegar Family property which is one of the highest priority acquisi-
tions to establish the trail corridor. This location would be the point along the existing trail where the northern
bypass should turn off of the former railway corridor. The route here would follow a City Comprehensive Plan
designated street extension (Cora Street) which is on the western edge of the established Hannah Street residential
area. Property owners along this route include the NVine} ars, Linders and Woods. The trail has been discussed
with these families and they are generally favorable towards the trail if fencing, acquisition, and appropriate
operation and security issues can be worked out to their satisfaction.
A
Ellensburg
john Wayne Pioneer mil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
24
segment A:
New trail following alignment of Cora Street/Rasmussen Road
Owners: Private Landowners (Wmegars, Linders, Woods)
land use: pasture/hayfield/future residential
dimensions: 25' wide x approx. 274.5 feet
Bender load Crossing
dimensions: 12'painted crosswalk x 30' long, signage, possible overhead warning sign
{�'r.� GCS �ry•. �r
Woodsproperty looking south from Bender Road. The trail would
follow the existing f nce line, with new fences along both sides of the trail.
john Mayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
25
rT
5
63
��
�.
o
cot °off
U7.3
G •6- 0 ci
c�]
w
cq .
P r,�
o�
a
5
63
ier3 ru;t�ru), 'f -'i
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
Section Al, Winegar Earls, l ookimg West
1 Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
A2 Section A2, Looking North
Section A3, Ellensburg Water Co. Canal Crossing, Looking West
1 Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
A4 Section A4, Looking North
1 Scalel/4"=1'-0" Affift
p
Segment B:
Bender to Bowers Road Route along Rasmussen Road ROW, or west of ROW
Owner: Kittitas County/ Woods family
land use: dirt road/pasture/hayfield
dimensions: 25' wide x approx. 2590' long
gobn 'P,i ; ne Pioneer nail Reconnection Steady Final Re, ort September 2001
78
C9� �
CD
r c
�r ® CilCA
" C
ro � 0
(� �• fl, S.L `� � �. IT,
• i
M
® Re reek oa
rO�/�
VJ L
• O
r•+ �
11 1 I`�
1
r
Cay
C�]
CM
CD
"Pd O
Q
C3
CD
�L Q.+ �
0
�- r` .rte*
• •
1
r
W-
4y. i Y 5 t gl 5.1 �Fl � '4
'!1� f r +y`' F -`. • 1 = ` ' •�"• r ✓_+ -> ti'`e{"'`W4
w. f w 3�
r h� I' I ti�
,.,c��y'`n� ��� � �� �.� ��y��F�''r.`.3'` � I a� [� +•r��4.. tike `I
kt t
"r. ..F� �4 t ky7 i,�. va ! ,•� Sf i'r`N +.4i � A [i 1 1
7�
m
_fid
1
'.
,
- .tea...
G
I
Cf�i i4
t;Z
r*G .
kr -
��k.
; :
'
ti:,•I Yf - s l
i', L •I jf w11✓T_7111I +fie `.-K1J4��Ci:�
V5N`
s
,
W-
4y. i Y 5 t gl 5.1 �Fl � '4
'!1� f r +y`' F -`. • 1 = ` ' •�"• r ✓_+ -> ti'`e{"'`W4
w. f w 3�
r h� I' I ti�
,.,c��y'`n� ��� � �� �.� ��y��F�''r.`.3'` � I a� [� +•r��4.. tike `I
kt t
"r. ..F� �4 t ky7 i,�. va ! ,•� Sf i'r`N +.4i � A [i 1 1
7�
m
PROPOSED JOI-gel WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
Bl Section B1, liasmu m Road, Looking North
Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
Section B2, Whisk" Creek Crossing Looking West
Scale 1/4'=1'-0"
Cl Section Cl, Bowers Road R.®.W., Looking West
1 ScAle X /4"= r-0"
V(
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
&t'.i.
n Cl, Whiskey Creek Crossing, Looking North
11 4"=1'-0"
6)—o Secfz9nl3 I&o! z , Northwest
Scalel/4"=T-0"
segment D:
Follows south edge of County property along north side of Cascade Canal Bowers to Blazing
Tree
owner: Kittitas County
land use: pasture/hayfield/feedlot/shooting range/light industry/future industrial to north
dimensions: z5 - 50' wide x 565o'
cGw
John Ma,,ne Pioneer mil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
Airport Road Crossing
(see non -motorized plan for safe crossing of a paved county road)
dimensions: i2'painted crosswalk 50' long, signage, overhead warning sign
John Mayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
35
.��'� ��
'”+.a , � .
_ s
.'l.
x
a
-14.)
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
:Z) Section D7, LookIng West Airport Road
D3) Section D3, Airport Road Crossing, Looking North
'-� Scale 1I4'= 1'-0"
(Mi Secfion D4, Lookhig West
\- �1 Scale l/4"=1'-0"
:Z)
/4'=V-0-
DS) Sed tines D.5, Look
Scale 1/4"=1'-0" IM
mm
segment E:
Turns south onto Blazing Tree Ranches property
owner: Steve Willard a
land use: pasture/hayfield
55dimensions: 25-30'x approx. 4000'
n t x
X --
r
i•
a l' +ark 1
L
.... .... � 4. � ,.. ,• xiaC` �'.•;1. Wf. _ f . ?iL1,�T f il�'h'""i'."
V-
}
Sanders Road Cmssing
dimensions: i2'painted crosswalk 50' long, signage, overhead warning; sign
,7ohn i7rtyne Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Steady Final Report
38
Seer 2001
T t +rT •.
�T'�"�,rX�GII.S1�jhyyf 4[A�y�y�,.i
'A`
ritV
+,.
r
Sanders Road Cmssing
dimensions: i2'painted crosswalk 50' long, signage, overhead warning; sign
,7ohn i7rtyne Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Steady Final Report
38
Seer 2001
PROPOSED JOIN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
Section F5, Cascade Canal Crossing, Looking West
1 Scale l/4"=1-0"
Pl Section F3, Frooklane Village, Looking North
1 Scale 1 / C=1'-0" 16'-5
(17') Section F2, 18th Avenue GrassinZ, Looking West
1 Scale 1 /4"=1'- r --
E3
IM
:: =... ercer Creek Crossing
E 71rrigatio4 DW— Crossing
{ y I 'NQS ' �i J ROAD
E4 Sanders Road. Crossing
I �I
F —Cascade, Canal Crossin
VrI
segment 0
3800 ft. Blazing Tree Ranches
owner: Steve Willard
325 ft owner: Jim. Carmody
IaY1d.. use: pasture/ hayfield
Neighborhood
Connection
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE TRAIIJ PLAN
pq Section Fd, Ditch Crossing. Looping West
3 Scale 1 /4"=1'-0"
Gl Section Cl,La*lcrng.North
Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
G2 Section G2, Looking North
1 Scale 1 /8"- l T
r_ r
PROPOSED JOHN WA'YNE TIAL RECONNECTION PLAID
b C—"
Z , Section F.7, Imeadon Ditch Crossinr, Looking West
a1-1/ Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
Section M. i oaic n North
E4 r Section E4, Sanders Road CrassirtZ Looking West
1 Scale 1/4"=1'-0"
segment F:
NE CWU campus
owner: OW - State of Washington
land use: undeveloped fie]
dimensions: 25' x 3500'
'Yobn Wzi vnr Pioneer Anil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
41
segment G:
Alder Street
owner: City of Ellensburg, CWl
land use: paved residential stree
dimensions: 10-16'x 1450'
10th Street/Vantage Highway Crossing at Alden Street
new user activated signal for safe crossing of a busy roadway
dimensions: 12'painted crosswalk x 70' long, signage, user activated crosswalk/ signal
John Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
45
11TH STREET
JOHN Tr►V'AYNE TRAIL
....... E.ECUNN TI0' N PLAN
AT ALDER & 10TH SIGNAL
approx. locati.oz
Linder Chiropractic Offic(
Proposed Undergroun
1'owe�ie .. _ ......
alley CM
edge of City Right of Way -
approx. location 76 Uni
Peterson Convenience st[
flush pavers &z bollards ''
as W
waox
RIGHT -0F -WAY
------- -- ---" " '--------------
new
- new signal poles ramp down
-a-
new crosses
10TH STREET
� MUD -101-
mn-��
wsdotst..................___,_..__ __-
removab eard `
bol]
V
W
12' wide concrete
paver trail
widen 5' walls to 12'
(4' to East -3' to Nest
relocate ADA
parking space close
to front door of
Linder Office
retain all street trees
approx. location
I® I Dalry QL1ee11
rip -
nnn or.,irjitis� rcarr. x
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE 'TRAIL, RECONNECTION PLAN
G3 Section G3, Wilson Creek Crossing, Looking North
1 Scale 1 4.7 —F -w
C4 Section G4, IE SlensbuEZ Water Co. Canal Crossing, Looking West
7 Scale 1/4"= V -0-
GS Section G5, Looking North
1 Scale 1 /4"=1'-0"
G6 Section GG 10th Avenue (Vanta a Hi way) Cmsrin& Looking West
1 Scale I/ 4*= V-0,
E:. ra`vi
segment H:
Old RR Grade west of existing undeveloped trailhead - from Alder Street to existing trail
owner: State of Washington Parks and Kittitas County Fairgrounds
land use: existing parking/ camping area for Fair & Rodeo
dimensions: 25'x 750'
involves new traffic circle, pedestrian zone, spokes to connect to fairgrounds/ rodeo
access to parking, trail, sidewalks, roadways and restrooms.
i!
,%bn Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report
49
September 2001
new signal poles ramp down
new Crosswalk l
1
10TH ST ET
------------ wsdatstd.... -
removable �o. -
bollard
New sidewalk & street trees
Fairgrounds Parking
Traffic Circled' sign/ fl
le
16
E-----------
----- -------- .............................
r
ting Trail
oll -ds & s age
ns t N ,
DOup—w
JOHN WAYNE TRAIL Fairgrounds ,I odco Entrance xisting
oun
:RECON EC�'I N PT, N R irgstroo
AT ITT' TAS�OUN Y
FAI . R UND
PROPOSED JOHN WAYNE TRAIL RECONNECTION PLAN
Section Gl Lookimm Nodh
1 Sc9e1/4"=l'-0"
Hl Section F4 Looking West
1 Scalel/4"=1'-0"
Il Section I1, CWU Campus Pedestrian/Bicycle Link, Looldng West
1 . /
U Section i2, CWU Campus Pedestrian / Iii de Link, I:22Km. West
1 Scale 1 / 4"=1'-0
r
^ I� '• �.- •'�h�" � .. .la°1 to
Pr- F j @ °i a Ain tGR`-[ igrntt .,'j�", "•t
i PLTEU009L >' r17
I ml
A'SWA
r: � �/,,-,}S�Yr I'i ..rte' ,r.�} t�'" ,.��•.
' .•M1: �Y' .!- .1�i 1.
4�
r [ a >w:: `• � As r' 1+t �:6 S. .3�P•d_ � r`�Fj.,ii'ti..� .'[t - ..�
ry yc Jt.}i � ," ^ I ! i L!rl+r� i yr[r; -�,• �J 1 'Yr i i L '-
tit
y ;
lTt;'. ,Yp
�f-
oil
r��7'1r rJ _.. I t �-I f Rel ;4 „l �+{r�: t� T _{��� `'1i+y1 � �II f'-'.Fr•7�4r; :.
k
rrl rEe l} h -,., rY '�a•V ,L}4,7� M ''� �,yp • �'
r
r
"te ;xf
.
��'#���. E"�s. � �.. �� 1. _ .��.,S�v'.yY�i s+%5 y fk "$I:!f ,t �rbS 4lk?i •�I..Ir�f'�72� 3vy":.s- i..�.
Segment J
Fix Existing Trail: Reconnection from Water Street to Winegar Triangle
Water Street to Cora extension
owner: State of Washington, City of Ellensburg
land use: existing trail
dimensions: 16 x 4050' long
r� ,r
I r
i e
! � i
Se cutin 11, Exisf rI&J-, fl.!) rt ,Trail Up�•rade, Looking Ncvthwmt
- sale 1I4-- r -a° —
_`obn Wryne Pioneer 7b -aid Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
54
Mlr-ail Corridor Acquisition,
PUBLIC LAND
As shown on the attached map and table, most of the Reconnection route is public land or
potentially new public ROW. 6M of the trail is presently in public ownership. 32% of the trail
is currently in private ownership, but over half of that is potentially new ROWwhich could be
added to public ownership as the community grows with guidance from the adopted and future
Comprehensive Plans (including Bowers Road, the Cora Street Extension, and other potential
future public R/W where development is expected over the next io-2o, years.
summaq of
total length in LF
(length in miles
''lo of total
current corridor
ownership
Suu m wry of current corridor ownership
_Nor_tWBypass_1_raiJ
stem
22931
4.34 miles
f
72 /0
ulrli wu 21526 If 4.07 miles 68% of total
- CWU
M�
s UW ki 7 _Urjc
4100
0.72 e
1310
link
City property
(4o� canal ore 0 -0
-State property
-County property
$ is exts"M
4050
0.77 e
130/0
existing JW trail
wmern link Water
Vrivatr Own_e hin 10305 If 1.96 miles 32% of total
St/Cora Street/ &
-Winegar
east C fairgrounds
750
-Linder
-Woods
-Willard
total
31531
6.03 miles
100%'
-Carmody
Bowers Rd. extension
Bowers Road Extension: Depending on the outcome of the Kittitas County Public Works
Bowers Road project, a portion of the Right of Way for the trail could be provided by Board of
County Commissioners (BOCC), who has been studying several optional routes, and a decision
is expected in the summer of 2oo1. If the BOCC chooses the Bowers route, the trail corridor
would be in place for the trail from Rasmussen Road to Airport Road. If other routes are
chosen, the trail corridor would have to be acquired separately.
Rasmussen Road could accomodate the trail as proposed as well as an improved roadway sub-
ject to approval by Kittitas County. However the R.1W is only 6o' wide, and if in the future a
road was also built in the alignment, an additional 20-30' may have to be acquired. The County
feels they can justify additional right of way outside the normal 6o' when they are pursuing a
major utility corridor or have to handle irrigation water. The option for a trail could be sup-
ported along with those other issues. Additional right of way solely for a trail is not a direction
the County feels they can support. Approximately $5o,000 - $iloo,000 would be needed to
acquire the additional R/W along Rasmussen Road.
Rasmussen Road could be traded to the City for the trail if there are any opportunities that
exist to benefit both parties. The state has agreed to resolve some of the issues the BOCC had
raised. The state is moving forward towards formalizing the agreement at the Fairgrounds and
the Tradhead. It now appears that Kittitas County BOCC's decision is to niove ahead with
Bowers Road preliminary design. The preliminary design will be done late in 2ooi, with the
earliest construction possible in 2002. Lands that will be needed for the trail corridor regard-
less of the Bowers Road segment are identified on the following page.
These should be a first priority for acquisition.
,7obn Wayne Pioneer 71rael Reconnection St'-M:y Final Report Sepre,-nbber 2001
56
IT
i6'7
CD
}Iia
i
�r t i i #rJ t
41
r AN
, � Y •
. •' I , 3 � .,.....a � , G ; a_=S " ..-� � •� } 1 _ y .fib'--
Of
i e I �—• _ -�• r �{,'_ � � 1. {,„� � ��"'�' G�' � .�..
t ,meq YN r99 192 —tag
^
MIN
1 �..} �� � �. • ? i E� 1-..,�r_I"'r'"';,{� � � ,� 'fir
c. .'"�.� � PO, s _ l] I {�„ i i'tIlSp, ,�• �•..�y •. 'a• • _ '�"` _ :�• Y `��
s
. ,,.. . ........
. , .._ .,, -—�-�-._sr1, Rv•.h'xva�!:Se � i"�'�'�,- `f. � .r'' r � ,�F^
ui
................ :.... t
v.^c: r t f, } f e ! •� te t-gam.-:-� r .
Y I :........... .^^r• aT
,
Fi
ZZ
PRIVATE LAND
Several private landowners that own portions of the route under consideration have been
contacted. The preliminary estimate for acquiring these important corridors is apprommat+ely
$i26,35o, based on a 5o foot wide corridor. Acquistion fonds may be available from the State of
Washington's Interagency Conunittee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) if the proper procedures
and finding requirements are followed. Other funding sources have been pursued (to date an
unsuccessful application through a County Sales Tax Grant). One important strategy for
applying for these funds is to target IAC applications for acquisition and development in the
spring of 2002, for potential funding in .2003.
IAC Manual #3 describes the process for acquiring land, doing appraisals, and related policies
relevant to the trail corridor.
Private Land alo Preferred Route
Trail Corridor ROW Needed (5o ft. wide)
tt umy Woods
f mlily
63215
Under
family
67900
5
fatWinegar
Y
17900
5
family
1513
164153
azs,000iacre
3.77 ages
i"OT'T
94,211
kJossible triangle Winegarjunction" atj "
West Side of town near Mt. Stuart d nwatarv'
5 000
25,000 acre
1.29 acres
32,140
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED TOTAL
PRIVATE CORRIDOR ACQUISTION
COST
$126,35®
John Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
58
Once the John Wayne/ Ellensburg Greenway Trail is built, the operation and maintenance of
the trail could be shared amongst the City, theUniversiv, and the State Parks Department.
'Me City of Ellensburg would be the primary beneficiary of the trail system, and the trail
would be an urban linear park much like the Centennial trail in Spokane, theYakima River
Greenway; and the Burke Gilman Trail in Seattle. The local Parks, Police and Public 'Mocks
Departments have operations and maintenance crews that could be funded to handle trail
cle•ir, r g, snow removal, security and enformcement. Presently these resources are overcommit-
ted so additional fiends and personnel would be required to sufficiently handle increased
workloads of taking care of a new 6 mile Luban greenway.
Kitdtas County is supportive of the John Wayne Trail Connection, but they do not want to
have to spend scarce resources on any development, construction or maintenance costs. The
County's share would be in acquiring the Bowers Road land and preserving the right -of way and
then seeing bow best to use that land part for road, part for utilities and a trail as an easement
on top of the uLdity corridor. Rasmussen Road is also an essential part of the trail which could
be provided by the County with sufficient RfW acquisition.
Washington State Parks now maintains the JWT from Thorp through Ellensburg and east
to the Columbia River, but only is staffed with one maintenance person. While their continued
stewardship of the rural trail is critical, the local agencies would need to take on increased
urban recreational trail maintenance.
Central Washington University's grounds crews may be able to allocate time for trail
maintenance, noxious weed control, litter pickup, mowiR , and landscape maintenance if suffi-
cient funds are made available.
j"ohn Wcgne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
59
A Draft Ellensburg Trail Inerag+ency Agreement has been distributed to the City of Ellensburg,
Washington State Parks and Recreation, Kittitas County, and Central Washington University.
The format and conceptual approach has been based on the Spokane Centennial.. Trail and the
Palouse Trail Cooperative Interagency Agreements, which involve two States, two Counties,
two Universities and several Cities.
The Draft Agreement has been reviewed briefly by some of these agencies, with only a few
comments recieved to date. This is due to the preliminary nature of any committments that
can. Presently be made by the City and State agencies. A considerable amount of discussion
must take place internally at these critical stakeholder agencies prior to any interagency agree-
ment to be signed by all parties.
One of the principle elements of making this (or any trail) a success is to ensure that the re-
sources to build, operate and maintain a high quality trail and linear park system are in place
before proceeding with construction. Sufficient funding to tame care of newly constructed
facilties is critical to work out with the Resource Management Agencies prior to begffining
construction, and setting up plans and personnel to be the stewards of the trail so construction
funds are not wasted by later neglect. The public does not usually support public agencies
building new facilities unless they have demonstrated their ability to take care of existing
facilities.
Some basic assumptions included in this report are that the trail would be maintained primarily
in the spring, summer and fall and that snow would not be plowed. It is estimated that at a
minimum) the new completed Ellensburg Greenway trail would cost approximately $40,000-
5o,000 per year to maintain adequately. This would include x Seasonal Trail Manager from
April -October @SY51hr, plus equipment rental (sweeper, pickup, blower, dump fees, repair and
signage budget). See appendix for further information.
jobn ftyne Pioneer Trail Reconnection Study Final Report
60
September 2001
Cost
Costs for complete design, permits, and construction for the trail system would be(in Zoog-3
dollars) approximately $3.3 million. This includes costs for grading, paving, fencing, landscap-
ing, lighting, benches, signage, design, overhead and proflt,contingency, project managment,
and sales tax. Details are shown below.
Right of Way costs would depend upon decisions made by Kittitas County and the City regard-
ing additional R/W that may be required depending on the route selected for Bowers Road and
Rasmussen Road, and on actual costs for acquiring easments or fee simple ownership of the
trail corridors proposed on private lands. Preliminary estimates are that acquistion would cost
approximately $125,000 for private lands, and approximately $50,o0o-$ioo,o0o for public land
acquisition along the Rasmussen Road alignment. Options to trade lands or acquire easements
at lower costs than purchasing exist in all corridors.
Jahn V;kVne Pioneer Buil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
61
Joan Wayne Pioneer Trail Reconnection through Ellensburg, WashiiWon
Preluninary Estinmted Cost of Design/Pe aitti ng/ Cowstnaction
R/W Costs not included (see acquisiciou Page ;4
7 ira l xa mmt_ Igor
110
11,
Wid tb
^25
41
•# ag"oe" Post
Segment A Es trail M
Bender Road
2745
68625
$222,825
{,OTL& STREET E= NSION at Wlm%c r Junction
including Wmegar, Linder, Woods
developed
and BPA substation
Woods acquisition
portion
Al- Winegar Triangle Park
wet arm
150
25
3750
$11,250
A2- 1Leaadner Pasture
765
25
19125
$57375
A3-E.'Wa+ter Co. Cwml Crossing
new bridge30
16
480
$19,200
A4- I'Voods Pasture
1800
25
45000
$135,000
A5 - Bevdcr IIoad Crosshag s. side Bender
N. side Bender
50
15
750
$2,250
overhead mast arm
X'rng painrlsi8ns
Segment Rasmussen Road
near Bowersaliyamrr
2590
25
64750
$208,375
RASMUSSEN RD. at Bender Rd.
B1- Woods Pasture
2140
25
53500
$160,500
B2-WJtiskeyCreek Crossing
newbridge
25
16
400
$16,000
B1- Pasture
425
25
Io625
$3rr875
plus new R/W costs for 30' corridor
2590
30
77700
1.78
acres' $250oo/acre
$50,000
C
C
Segment Bowers aligRmrnt
KC Airport Prop.
3000
25
75000
$225,00
BoUrER.S RD. at Reecer Cr. Rd
Cl -Bowers Buffer
430
25
10750
$32,250
C2 - Whiskey Creek Crossing
newbridge
15
16
240
$9,600
C3-''Vethaixds/Pas¢um area
2355
25
58875
$176,625
C4 -Cascade Camel Crossi7ng
newbridge
30
16
480
$19,200
Seg7saent 13 W.side KC Airport
E. Airport Prop.
5650
25
141250
5'412,725
AD p ® I' Property at Water Street
at Sanders Bend
DI -North side canx3
2260
20
45200
$135, 600
D2 - North side. residerAiA-
485
25
12125
$36375
I03- Aixport Road Cross'rrfg W. side Airport
E. side Airport
5o
15
750
$2,250
D4 - South side 1Aigiort Prop, south of Pallette Co.
1100
30
33000
$99,000
D5 -North side Mercer Creek south side Airport Prop.
1550
30
46500
$139,500
Segment S.side KC Airport
at Blazing Tree Rancl
3996
30
11988o
$343,190
WILLARD Prop--rty at Blazing Tree Ranch
near Alder
El - Mercer Cred3- Crossing
newbridge
25
16
400
$16,000
E2 -Ditch Crossing
newbridge
16
16
256
$10,240
E3 - I side future residential
1345
25
33625
$100,875
E4 - Sanders Road CrosSing N. side Sanders
S. side Sanders
50
15
750
$2,250
Ce'ARMOYDYProperty
325
30
9750
$29,250
E5-Cascade Caml Crossing
newbridge 30
16
480
$19,zoo
E3 - Inside f ature residential
2205
z5
55125
$165,375
Segment F NCWUcampus
CWU Property 3500
z5
87500
$267,240
CW IU (NE CAMPUS) at Blazing Tree Ranch
near Alder
Fl -Near B>i aokl2ne Vifte
1255
16
20080
$60,240
F2 -18th Ave. Crossing N. side r8th
S. side 18th 60
15
900
$3,000
F3-At edge of campus fields
630
z5
15750
$47250
F4 - Inside futuire residencW
2050
25
51250
$153750
include small new bridge
$3,000
Segment G SECWUcampus
Toth 1450
18
261oo
$327,850
ALDER STR EET at Alder Street (w.side) at Alder Street (w.side)
GI - Alder Street patl'way
485
Io
485o
$33950
G2 - Alder pathway - W of Wilson► Creels
2I0
15
3150
$22,050
G3 - Watson Creek Crossing
new bridge 25
I2
300
$I2,00o
G4-Ellensburg Water Co.Canal Crossing
newbridge 40
16
64o
$25,600
G5-Newpaverwaelkway
425
I2
5100
$102,000
G6 -10th Street Road Crossh N. side Alder
S. side Alder 70
15
85
$4,250
paver/bollard upgrades at(Alder future light)
G7 - Newpaverwallrway
400
16
6400
$I28,000
Segnient-H Fairgrounds/State Park EidstingTrail 750
25
18750
$56,250
Parking lot
near Fairgrounds
Segment Alder Street
Water Street 4100
IO
41000
$246,000
CWU Ped/Bike Connection expands sidewalk to r6 feet, adds street furniture, crosses several campus/city streets, campus signage
Segrraenti
Fix: ExistingjAV Pioncer traiWater Street
Winegar Triangle 4050
16
64800
$113,400
connecting Water to Cora paves 6 ft., adds fine crushed to remainder
estinmated consm;ction cost
$2,422,855
assumed minimum development costs
7.7% sales tax
$186,56o
$3.00/sf r1,ggcgnte construction cost for entire width'
15% Contractor Overhead & Profit
$363,428
includes grading, paving, trees and hydroseed,
Io% design/construction contingency
$260,941
limited lighting, benches, sigji-4ge, and fencing
5% Final designlpermit/pro) mgmt/admin
$I2I,143
no restrooms or shelters included
Estill[ meed TOTAL
$3,354,927
Action Plan
1. Establish. _ng a Citizen's Support Group is essential to the success of the trail.
2. Acquire Corridor on Private Lands. Negotiations and appraisals will need to move
forward on private land corridors for the trail in preparation for the next few years of budget
and grant cycles. After meetings with the Winegars, Woods, Carmodys and Linders, possible
Acquistions or Easements could be the highest priority for setting aside the trail corridor
before these lands are committed to other uses. (See Trail Corridor Acquisition, P. 56)
3. Stay involved wAh improvements at Alder & 10th Signalizationand Crossing:
The City is preparing to construct the new signalization and pedestrian crosswalk at this criti-
cal intersection for the trail. It is expected to be complete in 2oo2. There will still be many of
the details to be worked out with Linders and Petersons (business and landowners) along Alder
Street. This is a critical crossing to create a safe and visible connection.
4. Work with CWU : The University is interested in Quality of Life projects and is pursuing
several major new buildings that will help CWU keep pace with other state university's recre-
ation and student union facilities. Coupled with these builidings is the pedestrian and bicycle
trail system that will connect the campus with the local and regional trail system.
Bill Vertrees, Facilities Director and Advisor to our trail committee, has stated that a Site
Committee at CWU will be established to review and approve the trail concepts. Several
alumni have sent letters to the University to encourage the Board of Regents to consider com-
pleting the bike and pedestrian route through the campus, and according to Vice President
Abdul Nasser, the University is discussing how to make the trail a reality through the campus.
It is not clear how long it will take to recieve approval from the University, but it is important
to keep open lines of communication with them throughout the project. We encourage a liason
between CWU and the City that would help in this regard.
5. Work with fUttitas County Fairgrounds (trail, trailhead, signage): In principal, the
State and the County have worked towards trading some of the Fairgrounds area property to
better serve both interests and accomodate the trail extending west and north to the crossing at
loth and Alder. There should be design development and details done here very soon to make
sure the trail happens in the right place before parking lots, new entrances, get built. This
study will pursue this design prior to completion.
6. beep in the loop with Kittitas Couiaty The Kittitas County Board of Commissioners
have approved preliminary design to get underway later in zoos for the Bowers Road corridor.
Actions with regard to Bowers and Rasmussen Road, as well as the Airport Master Plan will
need to be followed closely to ensure the continued good working relationship with Kittitas
County.
7. The Iffateragancy Agreement involving all parties for acquistion, development, grant
writing, operation, maintenance and security issues need considerable attention to make the
trail a success. It is important for the lead agency to pursue this interagency agreement and
work out all the details and to get it signed. (See appendix for draft agreement)
-7obn Wayne Pioneer 77 -ail P. econnection Study Final Report September 2001
64
This study finds that a trail and greenbelt surrounding the growing urban area north of the City
of Ellensburg should be adopted as Public Policy to create a community asset that will increase
land value and the quality of life in Kittitas County.
The most important steps that should be taken are to adopt the plan and acquire rights to the
corridor. Development can come later as resources are available.
The trail project will require lobbying, grant -writing, persistence, committment, volunteer work
parties, in-kind donations from local businesses, travel to present Grant applications, in short:
ALot of Hard Work.
It is very important that supporters of the trail organize a supportgroup composed of Citizens and Business
representatives that can steward this project through its many stages from this point on. This takes more
than City staff (who are already very busy) ... it really takes some very committed volunteers to
augment the public agency's support of the project. Many successful grant applications involve
partnerships with strong volunteer citizen groups.
In the past year, The Ellensburg Parks and Recreation Department has held 16 meetings and
assessed several optional methods to develop a reconnection of the Cross State Trail through
Ellensburg. These meetings have included the John Wayne Trail Reconnection Steering Com-
mittee, Public Agencies, the Citizens, the Parks & Recreation Commission, the City Council,
and private landowners along the potential routes. In this process a plan that could create an
Ellensburg Greenbelt has emerged.
The preferred route is consistent with plans that were concieved years ago; many of the issues
have been worked out in greater detail, and we recommend the following steps be taken:
i. adoption of the concept
2. acquistion of the corridor and
3. opertional discussions and agreements to be made with agencies and landowners
4. apply for grants for construction
The Northern Bypass route is much more than a route for horses and wagons a few times a
year. It could be a wonderful separated greenway system (like the Yakima Greenway, Spokane's
Centennial Trail, or the Wenatchee River Trail System) that are both recreational and trans-
portation systems, and land use buffers that increase property values and enhance quality of life
for families and businesses in Ellensburg.
.3'obn IW2 yvne Pioneer Bail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
65
Appendix
DRAFT
CITY OF ELLENSBURG
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
KITTITAS COUNTY
INTERAGENCY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
JOHN WAYNE RECONNECTION ROUTE THROUGH ELLENSBURG, WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the City of Ellensburg, hereinafter referred to as the City, is owner of certain land within the John Wayne Trail corridor;
WHEREAS, the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, is owner of certain
lands within the John Wayne Trail corridor; and,
WHEREAS, Central Washington University, hereinafter referred to as the University, is owner of certain land within the John Wayne
Trail corridor;
WHEREAS, Kittitas County, hereinafter referred to as the County, is owner of certain land within the John Wayne Trail corridor; and,
WHEREAS, the trail offers recreation, transportation, cultural and natural system interpretation, land use buffering, wildlife and
water quality benefits to the Citizens of Ellensburg, Kittitas County, CWU staff and students, and the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, the City, the Commission, CWU, and the County desire to provide for the development and operation of a multi-purpose
trail system within the intent and authority of RCW 43.51.040(8) and RCW 39.34.030(2); and,
WHEREAS, all parties agree that the primary development objective should be to enhance the Milwaukee Railroad Corridor consis-
tent with the 1999 Iron Horse State Park Master Plan and provide facilities for public access, recreation, education and ecological
and historic interpretation; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission is authorized under RCW 43.51.040(8) and RCW 39.34.030(2) to cooperate with the County, University
and the City in accomplishing the program herein referred to and to enter into this agreement to that end; and,
WHEREAS, the Commission at its (date) ???? meeting authorized the Director or designee to enter into a long-term cooperative
agreement with die County and Cityfor the development and operation of the John Wayne Trail corridor; and,
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the trail corridor can most advantageously be managed by the CITY with shared operation,
maintenance and law enforcement responsibilities,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the parties hereby enter into an agreement for a manage-
ment program as described herein for the John Wayne Trail corridor.
1. The term of the agreement shall be for 40 years commencing on the date last below written. This agreement may
be renewed for any period not in excess of 40 years upon expiration of the original 40 -year term by mutual
agreement of the parties. Vie Commission will be given the first right to renew the agreement before any other
party is given the opportunity to manage the trail under agreement with the County, CWU and the City.
2. All development and management of the trail shall be the responsibility of the City and the City shall be the lead
agency do preparing future development plans. Operation, including maintenance and law enforcement, shall be
as set forth in the Management Plan labeled Exhibit "1 " attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof in
cooperation with a coordinating council comprised of one member each from State Parks, the City of Ellensburg,
Kittitas County, Central Washington University, and ( other groups? ) or assigns. Each jurisdiction shall be
responsible for all costs related to its trail operation, maintenance and law enforcement activities.
3. Management of the trail over its entire (??? ) mile length will be the responsibility of the CITY in cooperation
with the Commission, City, University and County as agreed to in the Management Plan. Management of the
lands outside the trail corridor shall be the same as set forth in Article 4 herein for maintenance of the designated
segments, except detailed in Article 8 herein.
4. Maintenance of the trail and adjacent City, CWU, County or Commission owned buffer land as agreed to in the
maintenance section of the Management Plan will be the responsibility of the Cityfrom to from ( )
5. Law enforcement of the trail as agreed to in the law enforcement section of the Management Plan will be shared
responsibility between the Commission, the City and the County. The Commission will patrol the entire trail
responding to trail user types of enforcement activities as part of their overall management responsibilities
John Tv' yne Pioneer ?rail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
66
activities. They will inform the City and/or County of urban and suburban type law enforcement situation beyond
park rule violations requiring city andlor county action. The City and County will be responsible for responding
to these enforcement activities.
6. The site is to be managed consistent with the provisions of Chapter 43.51 RCW and the rules and regulations
adapted thereunder, unless otherwise exempted by the Director of Commission.
7. Development and maintenance along the trail corridor shall be done in fullpossession of all necessary permits
and licenses and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations including SERA compliance and
consistent with the overall development plans prepared by the Coimnission. Obtaining permits will be responsi-
bility of the initiating party.
8. This agreement allows management by the County of Commission owned lands, as shown on (Exhibit "2"),
outside the trail corridor from the ( ). Any nwdifacations or uses of this propertyfor other that buffer shall be
consistent with trail development and preservation of the river corridor and approved by Commission staff prior
to use, modification or construction. Use of these lands for County recreation purposes may be granted by
amendment to this agreement upon approval of County plans for said property by Commission staff and approval
of use by the Commission. The County shall be possession of all necessary permits and licenses and shall carry
out all development, maintenance and operation according to all applicable codes and regulations, including
SERA and archaeological clearance.
9. This Agreement allows the use of County owned lands, as shown on Exhibit "2 ", by the Coirunission at ( ) for the
placement of ( ). All new facilities and improvements other than those specified above made by the Commis-
sion shall be consistent with trail development and preservation of the river corridor and approved by County staff
prior to construction. The Commission shall be in possession of all necessary permits and licenses and shall
carry out all development, maintenance and operation according to all applicable codes and regulations,
including those of SERA and archaeological clearance.
12. This agreement is only permission to allow the Commission to use County and City owned property and the
County to use the Commission owned property for the purposes and on the terns and conditions herein states. No
legal or equitable title is conveyed hereby. Title to the subject property shall remain with the landowner through-
out the terms of this agreement or any renewal therof.
13. The City and/or County shall defend and hold /aimless the Commission and the state of Washington, its officers,
agents, employees, successors or assigns against any and all claims suffered or alleged to be suffered on the
property, except such claims which arise out of the activities of the Commission, its officers, agents or employees,
for which claims the Commission, its officers, agents or employees, for which claims the Commission will defend
and hold the County and/or City harmless.
14. The City shall erect and maintain a sign(s) identifying the Commission, CWU and County as cooperating
agencies. Any development authorized in accordance with Article 8 herein shall be signed by the City, CWU and
County identifying the Commission as a cooperating agency. 77w Commission will be the primaryfocal point and
contact for signing.
15. This agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written consent of all parties hereto.
16. The provisions of this agreement may be modified at any time by the mutual consent of all parties hereto.
17. No rights under this agreement maybe assigned without the prior written consent of the other parties. This does
not preclude third parry agreements for concession or agricultural purposes in compliance with the Management
Plan.
18. Any tree removal shall be in accordance with landowner rules and regulations.
19. Vie site is to be used by the City, County, CWU and Commission for public trail corridor purposes. Except as
otherwise provided for Herein, this agreement may be terminated by any party in the event of non-compliance by
any party with the terms and conditions hereof, providing that the terminating party allow the non -complying
party 90 days written notice of violation in which to correct any situation which is not in compliance with the
terms and conditions of this agreement. If correction is not made to the satisfaction of the terminating party
within the 90 days, this agreement will automatically terminate without further notice.
20. Upon termination or expiration of this agreement all improvements placed on property under this agreement shall
be disposed of in compliance with applicable RCWs.
John Wayne Pioneer 7l -ail Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
67
Letters
May r7, 2001
Jim & Dorothy Carmody
1312 Sanders Road
Ellensburg, WA 98926
R.E.• _7ohn Wayne Trail Route
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Carmody,
To follow up our phone conversation this morning, I wanted to send you a letter about
the Trail Study we are working on. My company has been retained by the City of Ellensburg in
a collaborative effort with Kittitas County and thu State Parks Department to define a route
for the John Wayne trail reconnection. Several years ago both Kittitas County and the City, of
Ellensburg adopted a general route east of Alder and its proposed extension north to the airport
then west and south reconnecting with the trail west of the city. We have had several public
meetings and I believe you haven't attended. I've enclosed some materials for your review. I
look forward to showing you the trail project at our meeting Monday May 21, 2001.
The right of way would be purchased and there will be money for acquisition, the trail
will be quite attractive and an amenity for the community. There is every intention of address-
ing private property concerns in the design. (It would be similar to the Yakima Greenway as we
discussed). We believe there is funding for the improvements and that some construction could
start next year. The trail would go through CWU, Blazing The Ranch north of Sanders and
south of Cascade Canal. I would suggest that you contact Steve Willard who has had a long list
of property issues which I believe have been addressed in his siLUation.
I am enclosing a handout on the trail and a sketch of where the trail might cross your
property. The width of the trail corridor would be approximately 50 feet across the east portion
of Lot E on the O'Hare Survey in order to match the trail route north of Sanders and south of
Cascade Canal. A new bridge would be constructed in the approximate location of the old
existing bridge. Please call with any questions and to confirm your attendance at the meeting
on the 25th.
Sincerely,
John Barker
insert letters to Wmegar/Linder
6/6/01
John.
There is nothing that you can do to further seek our consideration. We are following our own
(CWU) internal processes to make John Wayne Trail Reconnection a reality. We will keep you
_7obn W ytre Pioneer : ?-,,.dl Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
68
apprised of the progress.
For your information, we have discussed this topic at cabinet, board of trustees resource devel-
opment committee, and I also see a letter from a CWU Alum to the Board of Trustees in
support of The John Wayne Trail Reconnection Plan.
Regards,
Ai3DuL NAsSER
jobn Werr_yne Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Study Final Report September 2001
69
Costs of operating and maintaining trails in other similar Cities:
16 mile Spokane Centennial Trail/ Yakima Greenway/ io miles on Richland's Columbia River
trail io miles on Richland's Columbia River trail
Wyn Birkenthal, Director of Parks & Recreation, Richland, WA suggests that an Ambassador/
Trail Maintenance Person/Contact person could runthe trail system, including maitenance,
events, Pace Car bollard removal for the system 6-8 months per year. This is based on his
experience with the Centennial trail and the Columbia River Trail in Richland.
Wyn's rescription for maintains a Centennial Trail in Spokane.
(16 miles of trail, 5 trailheads, 5 Restrooms, April -Oct = i FT person)
Sealcoat every 5 years
touch up and recompact gravel shoulders annually
weed control, sight distance maintenance qx year along natural border or. landscaping with trees
and grass would require some regular pruning and mowing.
If rollerblading there would be cleaning -sweeping every a weeks
trailheads/restroom maintenance
litter pick along trail minimal
litter pick up at trailheads definitely required weekly
Revenue sources (fiber optics?) AT&T did grading in exchange for fiber optics
but no ongoing revenue from AT&T
Other resources include:
Friends of Centennial Trail
Yakima Greenway
Tapteal Greenway from Richland -Benton City
What about restrooms along the JWPT?
gobn Wkf 'ne Pioneer Mud Reconnection Study pial Report September 2001
70
ittitas County Fairgrrounds
O
lm�M7
OEM
4FJJJ%%
,{ Reed Park -Ilk
J�t[rra,f: 1`
er-�T-5
4 AVENUE
k
tu—
!b?
rU ti.. .'!il...-
Partial List References & Sources
City of Ellensburg Non Motorized Plan, City of Ellensburg, Parametrix, Nov. 1997
Iron horse State Park MasterPlan, Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, MacLeod
Reckord, Landscape Architects, June 1999
Central Washington University Master Plan, CWU, NBBJ, June, 1999
Central Washington University Environmental Studies 444 Reconnecting the J hn Wa ne Pioneer
'frail, Dr. AnnRoot, Spring, 1999
Ellensburg Tourism Study, City of Ellensburg, Chandler and Brooks, 1999
Ellensburg's Commnithy of Choice, Compreshensive Parks and Recreation Plan, City of Ellensburg,
1995
Evaluation of the Burke -Gilman Trail's Effects on Property Values and Crime, Seattle Engineering
epartment and Office for Planning, Seattle, Washington, May 1987
K>ittitas County Public Works Department, Draft Airport Master Plan
Kittitas County Fairgrounds Master Plan
Kittitas County Bowers Road Extension Preliminary Design Reports, 2000-1
Rail Trails and Safe Communities: The Experience of 372 Trails, by Tammy Tracy and Hugh Mor-
ris, Rail to Trails Conservancy, Jan. 1998
The Mohawk -Hudson Bike Hike Trail: Its Impact on Adjoining Residential Properties, Schenectady,
new York, 1997
Transportation Enhancement Application and Grant for Reconnection Study, 1998, City of
Ellensburg
,7obn 11:;-.Y;, a Pioneer Dwil Reconnection Study Final Riport September 2001
72
Personal Contacts
We would like to express our sincere appreciation for all of the assistance that has been provided for
this project to the following people:
Scott Archer, Ellensburg Parks and Recreation Director
Steve Willard, Advisory Committee member and Landowner
John Akers, Ellensburg Public Works Director
Ryan Lyskii, Ellensburg Public Works Engineer
Paul Bennett, Kittitas County Public Works Director and Advisory Committee member
Bill Vertrees, Facilities Director, Central Washington University
Mel Sheyner, Advisory Committee member and Fair Board President
Brian Hovis, Washington State Parks Commission Planner and Advisory Committee member
Brian Carter, Washington State Parks Manager, Gingko Wanapum State Park
Lance Elliot, Washington State Parks Ramger, Gingko Wanapum State Park
Mark Johnson,General Manager of Kittitas County Fairground
Truman & GaryWinegar, Landowners
The Linder family
Jim Armstrong, Chamber of Commerce
Jack Price, Advisory Committee member and Equestrian
Walt Farrar, John Wayne Pioneer Wagons and Riders
John Woods, Jr., Landowner
Jim Carmody, Landowner
Abdul Nassar, Vice President, Central Washington University
Wyn Birkenthal, Richland Parks & Recreation Director
Chuck Cruse, Advisory Committee member and Professional Land Surveyor
Marla Parsel, former County Project Manager and City Councilperson
Sean Maupin, Former Parks Commissioner and Advisory Committee member
Ken Lloyd, Resident and Mountain to Sounds Board Member
Don Cummings, resident
Jim Cook, BPA foreman
Gordon Crane, cycler
Fred Johnston, Recycle Bicycle Shop
Roger Hoesterey, Trust for Public Lands
Mike Smith, City of Ellensburg Planning Department
Libby Street, CWU President's Office
Dr. Phil Backlund, CWU Professor
Backcountry Horsemen of WA Jim Murphy, Exec Director
Washington State Horse Council Ed Armstrong, Chair
Washington State Horseman Virginia Prigge, Exec.
-7obn Vii.yrne Pioneer 7Fai1 Reconnection Sturdy Final Report September 2001
73